Glen Randall

Dr. Glen Randall

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 February 2015 in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MEMark Embrett
Mark Embrett
GRGlen Randall
Glen Randall
Christopher J. LongoChristopher J. Longo
Christopher J. Longo
TNTram Nguyen
Tram Nguyen
GMGillian Mulvale
Gillian Mulvale

1 October 2010 in Community Mental Health Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GRGlen Randall
Glen Randall
PWPatricia A. Wakefield
Patricia A. Wakefield
DRDavid A. Richards
David A. Richards

20 February 2017 in Community Mental Health Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TNTram Nguyen
Tram Nguyen
MEMark Embrett
Mark Embrett
NBNeil Barr
Neil Barr
GMGillian M. Mulvale
Gillian M. Mulvale
DVDiana K. Vania
Diana K. Vania
BDBriano DiRezze
Briano DiRezze

22 October 2008 in Social Work in Health Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GRGlen Randall
Glen Randall
DKDarlene H. Kindiak
Darlene H. Kindiak
Recent literature considering the state of the social work profession has primarily focused on concerns about deprofessionalization. This article provides an overview of the literature on professionalization and professional decline in order to situate the social work profession within a broader context. The article then describes the emergence of a new role for social workers in Canada that crosses the boundaries between clinical, managerial, and legal aspects of client care in the area of mental health forensics. It is argued that the future of social work's professionalization project around the world may not be as bleak as has been portrayed in the literature.


26 September 2018 in Health Research Policy and Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MEMark Embrett
Mark Embrett
GRGlen Randall
Glen Randall
Reducing monies spent on unnecessary medical care is one possible target to improve value in healthcare systems. Regional variation in the provision of medical care suggests physician behaviour and patient demands influence the provision of unnecessary medical care. Recently, Choosing Wisely campaigns began using ‘top 5 do-not-do’ lists to target unnecessary medical care by encouraging greater physician and patient dialogue at the point of care. The present study aims to examine the rationale for Choosing Wisely Canada’s (CWC) design and to analyse physician perceptions regarding the features of CWC aimed to reduce unnecessary medical care. The study involved semi-structured interviews with 19 key informant physicians with CWC experience and the application of procedures of grounded theory to analyse interview transcripts and develop explanations addressing the objectives. Participants reported that the CWC was the medical community’s response to three pressures, namely (1) demand for unnecessary medical care from patients during the clinical encounter; (2) public perception that physicians do not always prioritise patients’ needs; and (3) ‘blunt’ government tools aimed to reduce costs rather than improving patient care. Respondents stated that involving the patient in decision-making would help alleviate these pressures by promoting the clinical encounter as the paramount decision-point in achieving necessary care. However, CWC does not address several of the key reasons, from a physician perspective, for providing unnecessary medical care, including time pressures in the clinical encounter, uncertainty about the optimal care pathway and fear of litigation. This study contributes to our understanding of the perceptions of physicians regarding the CWC campaign. Specifically, physicians believe that CWC does little to address the clinical reasons for unnecessary medical care. Ultimately, because CWC has limited impact on physician behaviour or patient expectations, it is unlikely to have a major influence on unnecessary medical care.