Gary R Kirk

Dr. Gary R Kirk

Center for Educational Networks & Impacts (CENI), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Thinking Skills and Creativity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJacob Grohs
Jacob Grohs
GKGary R Kirk
Gary R Kirk
MSMichelle M. Soledad
Michelle M. Soledad
David B. KnightDavid B. Knight
David B. Knight

3 June 2010 in Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GKGary R Kirk
Gary R Kirk
SNShabnam Beth Nolan
Shabnam Beth Nolan

23 June 2021 in Journal of Engineering Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAndrew L. Gillen
Andrew L. Gillen
JGJacob Grohs
Jacob Grohs
HMHolly M. Matusovich
Holly M. Matusovich
GKGary R Kirk
Gary R Kirk
Background: Calls to improve learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and particularly engineering, present significant challenges for school systems. Partnerships among engineering industry, universities, and school systems to support learning appear promising, but current work is limited in its conclusions because it lacks a strong connection to theoretical work in interorganizational collaboration.Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aims to reflect more critically on the process of how organizations build relationships to address the following research question: In a public–private partnership to integrate engineering into middle school science curriculum, how do stakeholder characterizations of the collaborative process align with existing frameworks of interorganizational collaboration?Design/Method: This qualitative, embedded multiple case study considered in‐depth pre‐ and post‐year interviews with teachers, administrators, industry, and university personnel during the first year of the Partnering with Educators and Engineers in Rural Schools (PEERS) program. Transcripts were analyzed using a framework of interorganizational collaboration operationalized for our context.Results: Results provide insights into stakeholder perceptions of collaborative processes in the first year of the PEERS program across dimensions of collaboration. These dimensions mapped to three central discussion points with relevance for school–university–industry partnerships: school collaboration as an emergent and negotiated process, tension in collaborating across organizations, and fair share in collaborating toward a social goal.Conclusions: Taking a macro‐level look at the collaborative processes involved enabled us to develop implications for collaborative stakeholders to be intentional about designing for future success. By systematically applying a framework of collaboration and capitalizing on the rich situational findings possible through a qualitative approach, we shift our understanding of collaborative processes in school–university–industry partnerships for engineering education and contribute to the development of collaboration theory.

1 January 2020 in The Journal of STEM Outreach
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJacob Grohs
Jacob Grohs
AGAndrew L. Gillen
Andrew L. Gillen
HMHolly M. Matusovich
Holly M. Matusovich
GKGary R Kirk
Gary R Kirk
HLHolly L. Lesko
Holly L. Lesko
CCCheryl Carrico
Cheryl Carrico
Broadening participation in engineering is an important national priority and has led to increasing demands for engineering content to be integrated into traditional K-12 curriculum. However, expecting teachers to incorporate engineering into their classrooms without additional training or resources is unreasonable. Partnering teachers with industry partners is one promising way to prioritize integrated science and engineering content while also introducing youth to possible career paths. In this programmatic article, we introduce the Partnering with Educators and Engineers in Rural Schools (PEERS) project that focuses on the collaborative design, implementation, and study of recurrent hands-on engineering activities with middle school youth in three rural communities in or near Appalachia. We discuss the curricular priorities of the program as well as preliminary findings on both student-focused and capacity-building metrics across the partnerships. Key discussion points include (1) a need to distill goals for engineering outreach by wrestling with what success might really look like for middle-school youth engagement with engineering and (2) cultivating community capacity to better support education systems and the simultaneous potential for and challenges of collaborating to build such infrastructure.

13 August 2014 in Journal of College and Character
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAnalise N. Adams
Analise N. Adams
RBRyan J. Brock
Ryan J. Brock
KGKatie A. Gordon
Katie A. Gordon
JGJacob Grohs
Jacob Grohs
GKGary R Kirk
Gary R Kirk

10 September 2020
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PDF file
HLHolly Larson Lesko
Holly Larson Lesko
JGJacob R. Grohs
Jacob R. Grohs
HMHolly M. Matusovich
Holly M. Matusovich
GKGary R Kirk
Gary R Kirk
CCCheryl Carrico
Cheryl Carrico
LBLiesl M Baum
Liesl M Baum