Hanze Yu

Mr. Hanze Yu

Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 February 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LQLi Qiyuan
Li Qiyuan
WYWei Yang
Wei Yang
NKNiklaus Kohler
Niklaus Kohler
LYLu Yang
Lu Yang
JLJie Li
Jie Li
JRJun Ren
Jun Ren
The integrated description of the building geometry and the element attributes of the building information model (BIM) can reduce the effort needed to acquire data for life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) at each design stage while supporting their potential for analyzing life cycle performances and feeding back to the design process. To support this, several methods and tools have been proposed that aim to obtain the life cycle performances of buildings following the level of model fidelity with the life cycle inventory (LCI) database at different scales. However, inconsistencies in decision-making caused by regional differences in LCA/LCC data sources, benchmarks, and building standards cannot be ignored. In this study, a scalable LCA/LCC method integrated with the BIM platform is proposed for the whole green building design process in the Chinese context, and it is implemented with a developed tool based on Revit. A national-/regional-specified database of building elements and materials is established. Referring to China’s carbon-neutral target and relevant standards for green buildings, the baseline values are deduced, and a reference building is defined accordingly to facilitate the evaluation and improvement of the design scheme. According to the Assessment Standard for Green Building (GB50378-2019) and the survey of architectural design practices in China, the key parameters at different design stages are defined. The method and tool are demonstrated using the case study of a school building, analyzing its life cycle carbon emissions and life cycle costs throughout the design process. The results show that the proposed method can facilitate the improvement of the scheme at different design stages and that it can cope with different data accuracies and different LODs in the building information model in the Chinese green building design process. Lastly, the uncertainties raised by the data quality and time-associated factors are discussed.

7 July 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HYHanze Yu
Hanze Yu
WYWei Yang
Wei Yang
LQLi Qiyuan
Li Qiyuan
JLJie Li
Jie Li
The main considerations in the early stage of architectural design are usually related to form and function. At the same time, with the growing concern regarding energy saving and carbon emission reduction, the parameters for the construction and physical quality of buildings are receiving more attention at the conceptual and schematic design stages. Diverse design options can emerge with the large number of variables to be considered in these stages. Moreover, the combined efforts to reduce buildings’ life cycle environmental impacts and cost, as well as the non-linear and often tradeoff relationship between the two objectives, make finding optimal design solutions for buildings’ life cycle performance complicated. Previous studies have established workflows to optimize buildings’ life cycle energy consumption, GWP, and/or cost; however, architectural design diversity has not been sufficiently discussed at the same time. In this study, a parametric optimization design process is established, aiming at minimizing the building’s operational energy consumption, life cycle environmental impacts, and life cycle cost. The setting of variables, as well as the workflows of the optimization process, is discussed from the perspective of both life cycle performance and architectural design diversity. A small-scale exhibition hall in China’s cold climate zone is selected as a case study. To approach the best design process applicable to this case, the optimal solution sets from different workflows under different variable settings are compared. The results show that by setting geometric and material variables in different steps in the entire optimization process, the resulting solutions can be a balance of architectural design and performance. In this case study, optimizing all of the design variables in one-step turned out to provide the best balance between design diversity and life cycle performance in the early design stage.

22 November 2002
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
HYHanze Yu
Hanze Yu
WWW. Wolf
W. Wolf
A new methodology of image and keyframe retrieval for image and video databases is presented. In contrast to previous approaches, which only support similarity retrieval and direct image manipulation on-line, our system performs tagging off-line using neural network algorithm and answers query on-line using only the tags. This new method is more appealing in meeting user's needs than only emphasizing what current technology can offer. Experiments on our CAETI (Computer Assisted Education & Training Initiative) IML (Internet Multimedia Library) show that this model gives high quality query results with fast on-line performance. This visual search system is available at http:/www.videolib.princeton.edu/test/retrieve.

1 August 2019 in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
HYHanze Yu
Hanze Yu
WYW Yang
W Yang
QLQ Li
Q Li
The early design stages of buildings have the highest potential for optimizing energy efficiency. From the aspect of architectural design, the architects can hardly make the best decisions of the complexed variables of geometries and materials. The choice and weighting of different optimization objectives also have no reference while considering the impacts from the whole view of the life cycle. In this paper, a simulation-based parametric approach through the use of multi-objective optimization method is framed. The extraction of geometry variables from the original design and the principles of explaining optimization results obtained from different objective combinations are discussed. This process is carried out in Rhino and Grasshopper. To fully consider the aesthetic and building performance step by step in early design stages, the geometry and material parameters are tested simultaneously. The life cycle inventory data of materials and energy resources are imported by programming, and local data is partly used. Life cycle environmental impacts (PED and GWP), life cycle cost, and operating energy consumption are used as optimization objectives. A case study is verified on a project of a small campus museum building in northern China. The results indicate that the combination of geometry and material values in the optimal solution set is various and needs to be artificially selected according to actual needs. The optimization objectives should be considered comprehensively; an incomplete set may result in poorly behavior of the unselected objectives.