Michael L. Hecht

Dr. Michael L. Hecht

Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2003 in Prevention Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Michael L. HechtMichael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht
FMFlavio Francisco Marsiglia
Flavio Francisco Marsiglia
EEElvira Elek
Elvira Elek
DWDavid A. Wagstaff
David A. Wagstaff
SKStephen Kulis
Stephen Kulis
MMMichelle Miller-Day
Michelle Miller-Day

8 September 2012 in American Journal of Community Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMargaret Colby
Margaret Colby
Michael L. HechtMichael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht
MMMichelle Miller-Day
Michelle Miller-Day
JKJanice Krieger
Janice Krieger
ASAmy K. Syvertsen
Amy K. Syvertsen
JPJonathan Pettigrew
Jonathan Pettigrew

1 September 2006 in Health Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael L. HechtMichael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht
JGJohn W. Graham
John W. Graham
EEElvira Elek
Elvira Elek
This study evaluates the Drug Resistance Strategies (DRS) project, a culturally grounded, communication-based substance use prevention program implemented in 35 middle schools in Phoenix, Arizona. The intervention consisted of 10 lessons taught by the classroom teacher that imparted the knowledge, motivation, and skills needed to resist drug offers. The evaluation used growth modeling to analyze significant differences in average postintervention substance use (alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana) and growth of use over the course of the study. The study involved 6,298 seventh graders (65% Mexican/Mexican American) who responded to at least 1 of 4 questionnaires (1 pretest and 3 follow-up measures). When compared to a control group, the DRS intervention appeared to significantly limit the increase in the number of students reporting recent substance use, especially alcohol and marijuana use. The multicultural version of the curriculum proved most broadly effective, followed by the version targeting Mexican...

1 November 2017 in Addictive Behaviors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LDL. Edward Day
L. Edward Day
MMMichelle Miller-Day
Michelle Miller-Day
Michael L. HechtMichael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht
DFDesiree Fehmie
Desiree Fehmie
The present study reports a preliminary evaluation of D.A.R.E.'s new elementary school keepin' it REAL substance abuse prevention program. Given the widespread dissemination of D.A.R.E., this evaluation, even though of short term effects, has important implications for national prevention efforts. The new prevention curriculum teaches social and emotional competencies such as decision making and resistance skills. Social and emotional competencies and other risk factors were examined among students (N=943) in 26 classrooms, 13 classrooms in the treatment condition (n=359) and 13 classrooms in the control condition (n=584) using a quasi-experimental matched group design. Pretest comparisons of treatment and control groups were completed, along with attrition analyses, and hierarchical logistic and linear regressions were computed to assess the intervention. The results revealed that the intervention produced significant effects on preventative factors such as the likelihood of resisting peer pressure, increased responsible decision making knowledge and decision-making skills, and confidence in being able to explain why they would refuse offers of cigarettes. The results of this study suggest that D.A.R.E.'s elementary keepin' it REAL program has promise as a social and emotional learning (SEL) based prevention program.

1 December 2000 in Communication Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael L. HechtMichael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht
SFSandra L. Faulkner
Sandra L. Faulkner
We explored the negotiation of Jewish American identity from a Communication Theory of Identity perspective. Interviews with 26 Jewish Americans revealed that participants contend with their group‐based identity on personal and relational levels when faced with decisions about whether to reveal or conceal their Jewish identity. Participants discussed Jewish identity management in their own lives and in the lives of other people they know. Analyses resulting in the themes of closeting, centrality of identity, and potential consequences reflect participants’ personal and relational levels of identity. These themes are played out in the how, when, why, and if of participants’ identity management. Rules were derived to explain these processes and the implications of the themes are discussed in light of the Communication Theory of Identity and Communication Boundary Management.