Martin Henze

Dr. Martin Henze

Fraunhofer FKIE
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
APAndriy Panchenko
Andriy Panchenko
FLFabian Lanze
Fabian Lanze
AZAndreas Zinnen
Andreas Zinnen
Martin HenzeMartin Henze
Martin Henze
JPJan Pennekamp
Jan Pennekamp
TEThomas Engel
Thomas Engel

11 September 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMartin Serror
Martin Serror
SHSacha Hack
Sacha Hack
Martin HenzeMartin Henze
Martin Henze
MSMarko Schuba
Marko Schuba
KWKlaus Wehrle
Klaus Wehrle
Given the tremendous success of the Internet of Things in interconnecting consumer devices, we observe a natural trend to likewise interconnect devices in industrial settings, referred to as Industrial Internet of Things or Industry 4.0. While this coupling of industrial components provides many benefits, it also introduces serious security challenges. Although sharing many similarities with the consumer Internet of Things, securing the Industrial Internet of Things introduces its own challenges but also opportunities, mainly resulting from a longer lifetime of components and a larger scale of networks. In this paper, we identify the unique security goals and challenges of the Industrial Internet of Things, which, unlike consumer deployments, mainly follow from safety and productivity requirements. To address these security goals and challenges, we provide a comprehensive survey of research efforts to secure the Industrial Internet of Things, discuss their applicability, and analyze their security benefits.

16 September 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKTim Krause
Tim Krause
RERaphael Ernst
Raphael Ernst
BKBenedikt Klaer
Benedikt Klaer
IHImmanuel Hacker
Immanuel Hacker
Martin HenzeMartin Henze
Martin Henze
Increasing volatilities within power transmission and distribution force power grid operators to amplify their use of communication infrastructure to monitor and control their grid. The resulting increase in communication creates a larger attack surface for malicious actors. Indeed, cyber attacks on power grids have already succeeded in causing temporary, large-scale blackouts in the recent past. In this paper, we analyze the communication infrastructure of power grids to derive resulting fundamental challenges of power grids with respect to cybersecurity. Based on these challenges, we identify a broad set of resulting attack vectors and attack scenarios that threaten the security of power grids. To address these challenges, we propose to rely on a defense-in-depth strategy, which encompasses measures for (i) device and application security, (ii) network security, and (iii) physical security, as well as (iv) policies, procedures, and awareness. For each of these categories, we distill and discuss a comprehensive set of state-of-the art approaches, as well as identify further opportunities to strengthen cybersecurity in interconnected power grids.

1 March 2016 in Future Generation Computer Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Martin HenzeMartin Henze
Martin Henze
LHLars Hermerschmidt
Lars Hermerschmidt
DKDaniel Kerpen
Daniel Kerpen
RHRoger Häußling
Roger Häußling
BRBernhard Rumpe
Bernhard Rumpe
KWKlaus Wehrle
Klaus Wehrle
In the near future, the Internet of Things is expected to penetrate all aspects of the physical world, including homes and urban spaces. In order to handle the massive amount of data that becomes collectible and to offer services on top of this data, the most convincing solution is the federation of the Internet of Things and cloud computing. Yet, the wide adoption of this promising vision, especially for application areas such as pervasive health care, assisted living, and smart cities, is hindered by severe privacy concerns of the individual users. Hence, user acceptance is a critical factor to turn this vision into reality.To address this critical factor and thus realize the cloud-based Internet of Things for a variety of different application areas, we present our comprehensive approach to privacy in this envisioned setting. We allow an individual user to enforce all her privacy requirements before any sensitive data is uploaded to the cloud, enable developers of cloud services to integrate privacy functionality already into the development process of cloud services, and offer users a transparent and adaptable interface for configuring their privacy requirements. Observation: Adoption of cloud-based IoT is hindered by severe privacy concerns.We protect potentially sensitive data before it is uploaded to the cloud.We support service developers in developing privacy functionality for a service.We shift decisions about privacy from developers and providers to users.We provide users with a transparent and adaptable interface for configuring privacy.

7 December 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Roman MatzuttRoman Matzutt
Roman Matzutt
JHJens Hiller
Jens Hiller
Martin HenzeMartin Henze
Martin Henze
JZJan Henrik Ziegeldorf
Jan Henrik Ziegeldorf
DMDirk Müllmann
Dirk Müllmann
KWKlaus Wehrle
Klaus Wehrle

1 May 2019
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
JPJan Pennekamp
Jan Pennekamp
RGRene Glebke
Rene Glebke
Martin HenzeMartin Henze
Martin Henze
Tobias MeisenTobias Meisen
Tobias Meisen
Christoph QuixChristoph Quix
Christoph Quix
KWKlaus Wehrle
Klaus Wehrle
New levels of cross-domain collaboration between manufacturing companies throughout the supply chain are anticipated to bring benefits to both suppliers and consumers of products. Enabling a fine-grained sharing and analysis of data among different stakeholders in an automated manner, such a vision of an Internet of Production (IoP) introduces demanding challenges to the communication, storage, and computation infrastructure in production environments. In this work, we present three example cases that would benefit from an IoP (a fine blanking line, a high pressure die casting process, and a connected job shop) and derive requirements that cannot be met by today's infrastructure. In particular, we identify three orthogonal research objectives: (i) real-time control of tightly integrated production processes to offer seamless low-latency analysis and execution, (ii) storing and processing heterogeneous production data to support scalable data stream processing and storage, and (iii) secure privacy-aware collaboration in production to provide a basis for secure industrial collaboration. Based on a discussion of state-of-the-art approaches for these three objectives, we create a blueprint for an infrastructure acting as an enabler for an IoP.