Marian Drusa

Prof. Dr. Marian Drusa

University of Žilina, Žilina, Žilinský, Slovakia
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Procedia Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMartin Decký
Martin Decký
Marian DrusaMarian Drusa
Marian Drusa
KZKatarína Zgútová
Katarína Zgútová
MBMatej Blaško
Matej Blaško
MHMatej Hájek
Matej Hájek
WSWalter Scherfel
Walter Scherfel
The article presents the possibilities of using lightweight concrete - foam concrete in road construction. Principles of sustainable development create the need to develop new building materials. Foam concrete is a type of lightweight concrete that has many advantages compared to conventional building materials, for example low density and thermal insulation characteristics. With current development level, any negatively influencing material features are constantly eliminated as well. This paper deals with the substitution of hydraulically bound mixtures by cement foam concrete Poroflow 17-5. The executed assessment is according to the methodology of assessing the existing asphalt pavements in Slovak Republic. The special calculation was used to estimate the modulus of foamed concrete Poroflow 17-5 based on the results of static load tests conducted using the experimental in-situ stand

15 November 2013 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarian Marschalko
Marian Marschalko
IYISIK YILMAZ
ISIK YILMAZ
DLDavid Lamich
David Lamich
Marian DrusaMarian Drusa
Marian Drusa
Darja KubečkováDarja Kubečková
Darja Kubečková
ASAlena Sochorková
Alena Sochorková

29 December 2013 in Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarian Marschalko
Marian Marschalko
IYISIK YILMAZ
ISIK YILMAZ
KKKarel Kubečka
Karel Kubečka
TBTomaš Bouchal
Tomaš Bouchal
MBMartin Bednárik
Martin Bednárik
MBMiroslava Bendová
Miroslava Bendová

1 February 2013 in Engineering Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTomáš Kempa
Tomáš Kempa
MMMarian Marschalko
Marian Marschalko
IYIşık Yilmaz
Işık Yilmaz
ELEva Lacková
Eva Lacková
KKKarel Kubečka
Karel Kubečka
MBMiroslava Bendová
Miroslava Bendová

22 November 2014 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PJPeter Jelínek
Peter Jelínek
MMMarian Marschalko
Marian Marschalko
DLDavid Lamich
David Lamich
IYISIK YILMAZ
ISIK YILMAZ
PZPetra Zastěrová
Petra Zastěrová
HRHana Růčková
Hana Růčková

16 April 2022 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Martin DeckýMartin Decký
Martin Decký
Marian DrusaMarian Drusa
Marian Drusa
Daniel PapánDaniel Papán
Daniel Papán
JSJuraj Sramek
Juraj Sramek
In the present study, credible analytical and numerical models are developed in order to explain the apparent discrepancies in the ratios of static and dynamic deformation models for assessing the quality of mechanical efficiency of transport structures in Central Europe. Through of experience, authors specifically deal with the comparison of two commonly used methods: the dynamic load plate test, known as the lightweight dynamic test and the static plate load test. This paper presents the relevant correlation dependency of the most commonly used quantification characteristics in earthworks quality control. Their correlation was obtained by applying the static theory of impact to earthworks quality control, which allows for the application of several quality control methods, in line with other member states of the European Union, specifically with regard to constructions under various boundary conditions (climate, soil moisture of the specified layer). According to an analysis of the results of comparisons of static and dynamic load tests, analytical and numerical models of the subsoil formed by soils and uncemented structural materials, respectively, the linear calculation usually used in the conditions of Central Europe does not have universal validity. Rather than relying on the analytical and FEM models for the soil, the authors have determined that the above dependence is a power dependence.