Arun Prasanth Nagalingam

Dr. Arun Prasanth Nagalingam

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGuo Dong Goh
Guo Dong Goh
Vishwesh DikshitVishwesh Dikshit
Vishwesh Dikshit
ANArun Prasanth Nagalingam
Arun Prasanth Nagalingam
GGGuo Liang Goh
Guo Liang Goh
Shweta AgarwalaShweta Agarwala
Shweta Agarwala
WYW.Y. Yeong
W.Y. Yeong


11 January 2025 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANArun Prasanth Nagalingam
Arun Prasanth Nagalingam
MSMuhammad Shamir
Muhammad Shamir
ETErkan Bugra Tureyen
Erkan Bugra Tureyen
ASAdrian Richard Charles Sharman
Adrian Richard Charles Sharman
Ozgur PoyrazOzgur Poyraz
Ozgur Poyraz
JHJames Hughes
James Hughes


14 March 2017 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vishwesh DikshitVishwesh Dikshit
Vishwesh Dikshit
ANArun Prasanth Nagalingam
Arun Prasanth Nagalingam
YYYee Ling Yap
Yee Ling Yap
Swee Leong SingSwee Leong Sing
Swee Leong Sing
Wai Yee  Yeong Wai Yee Yeong
Wai Yee Yeong
WJWei Jun
Wei Jun
The objective of this investigation was to determine the quasi-static indentation response and failure mode in three-dimensional (3D) printed trapezoidal core structures, and to characterize the energy absorbed by the structures. In this work, the trapezoidal sandwich structure was designed in the following two ways. Firstly, the trapezoidal core along with its facesheet was 3D printed as a single element comprising a single material for both core and facesheet (type A); Secondly, the trapezoidal core along with facesheet was 3D printed, but with variation in facesheet materials (type B). Quasi-static indentation was carried out using three different indenters, namely standard hemispherical, conical, and flat indenters. Acoustic emission (AE) technique was used to capture brittle cracking in the specimens during indentation. The major failure modes were found to be brittle failure and quasi-brittle fractures. The measured indentation energy was at a maximum when using a conical indenter at 9.40 J and 9.66 J and was at a minimum when using a hemispherical indenter at 6.87 J and 8.82 J for type A and type B series specimens respectively. The observed maximum indenter displacements at failure were the effect of material variations and composite configurations in the facesheet.

1 January 2018 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vishwesh DikshitVishwesh Dikshit
Vishwesh Dikshit
ANArun Prasanth Nagalingam
Arun Prasanth Nagalingam
YYYee Ling Yap
Yee Ling Yap
Swee Leong SingSwee Leong Sing
Swee Leong Sing
WYWai Yee Yeong
Wai Yee Yeong
JWJun Wei
Jun Wei