Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities among women worldwide. Conventional screening and risk prediction models primarily rely on demographic and patient clinical history to devise policies and estimate likelihood. However, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in the development of personalized risk models. These models leverage individual patient information obtained from medical imaging and associated reports. In this systematic review, we thoroughly investigated the existing literature on the application of DL to digital mammography, radiomics, genomics, and clinical information for breast cancer risk assessment. We critically analyzed these studies and discussed their findings, highlighting the promising prospects of DL techniques for breast cancer risk prediction. Additionally, we explored ongoing research initiatives and potential future applications of AI-driven approaches to further improve breast cancer risk prediction, thereby facilitating more effective screening and personalized risk management strategies.Objective and methods: This study presents a comprehensive overview of imaging and non-imaging features used in breast cancer risk prediction using traditional and AI models. The features reviewed in this study included imaging, radiomics, genomics, and clinical features. Furthermore, this survey systematically presented DL methods developed for breast cancer risk prediction, aiming to be useful for both beginners and advanced-level researchers.Results: A total of 600 articles were identified, 20 of which met the set criteria and were selected. Parallel benchmarking of DL models, along with natural language processing (NLP) applied to imaging and non-imaging features, could allow clinicians and researchers to gain greater awareness as they consider the clinical deployment or development of new models. This review provides a comprehensive guide for understanding the current status of breast cancer risk assessment using AI.Conclusion: This study offers investigators a different perspective on the use of AI for breast cancer risk prediction, incorporating numerous imaging and non-imaging features.

Background: Recent advancements in computing power and state-of-the-art algorithms have helped in more accessible and accurate diagnosis of numerous diseases. In addition, the development of de novo areas in imaging science, such as radiomics and radiogenomics, have been adding more to personalize healthcare to stratify patients better. These techniques associate imaging phenotypes with the related disease genes. Various imaging modalities have been used for years to diagnose breast cancer. Nonetheless, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), a state-of-the-art technique, has produced promising results comparatively. DBT, a 3D mammography, is replacing conventional 2D mammography rapidly. This technological advancement is key to AI algorithms for accurately interpreting medical images. Objective and methods: This paper presents a comprehensive review of deep learning (DL), radiomics and radiogenomics in breast image analysis. This review focuses on DBT, its extracted synthetic mammography (SM), and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Furthermore, this survey provides systematic knowledge about DL, radiomics, and radiogenomics for beginners and advanced-level researchers. Results: A total of 500 articles were identified, with 30 studies included as the set criteria. Parallel benchmarking of radiomics, radiogenomics, and DL models applied to the DBT images could allow clinicians and researchers alike to have greater awareness as they consider clinical deployment or development of new models. This review provides a comprehensive guide to understanding the current state of early breast cancer detection using DBT images. Conclusion: Using this survey, investigators with various backgrounds can easily seek interdisciplinary science and new DL, radiomics, and radiogenomics directions towards DBT.

The increasing incidence and mortality of breast cancer pose significant global challenges for women. Deep learning (DL) has shown superior diagnostic performance in breast cancer classification compared to human experts. However, most DL methods have relied on unimodal features, which may limit the performance of diagnostic models. Recent studies focus on multimodal data along with multiple views of mammograms, typically two: Cranio-Caudal (CC) and Medio-Lateral-Oblique (MLO). Combining multimodal data has shown improvements in classification effectiveness over single-modal systems. In this study, we compiled a multimodal dataset comprising imaging and textual data (combination of clinical and radiological features). We propose a DL-based multiview multimodal feature fusion (MMFF) strategy for breast cancer classification that utilizes images (four views of mammograms) and tabular data (extracted from radiological reports) from our newly developed in-house dataset. Various augmentation techniques are applied to both imaging and textual data to expand the training dataset size. Imaging features were extracted using a Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) network-based ResNet50 model, while textual features were extracted using an artificial neural network (ANN). Afterwards, extracted features from both modalities were fused using a late feature fusion strategy. Finally, fused features were fed into the ANN for the final classification of breast cancer. In our study, we compared the performance of our proposed MMFF model with single-modal models (image only) and models built on textual data. The performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1 score and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) metrics. Our model MMFF achieved an AUC of 0.965 for benign vs malignant classification as compared to image-only (ResNet50 = 0.545), text-only (ANN = 0.688, SVM = 0.842) and other multimodal approaches (ResNet50+ANN = 0.748, EfficientNetb7+ANN = 0.874).

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) encompasses various neurological disorders with symptoms varying by age, development, genetics, and other factors. Core symptoms include decreased pain sensitivity, difficulty sustaining eye contact, incorrect auditory responses, and social engagement issues. Diagnosing ASD poses challenges as signs can appear at early stages of life, leading to delayed diagnoses. Traditional diagnosis relies mainly on clinical observation, which is a subjective and time-consuming approach. However, AI-driven techniques, primarily those within machine learning and deep learning, are becoming increasingly prevalent for the efficient and objective detection and classification of ASD. In this work, we review and discuss the most relevant related literature between January 2016 and May 2024 by focusing on ASD detection or classification using diverse technologies, including magnetic resonance imaging, facial images, questionnaires, electroencephalogram, and eye tracking data. Our analysis encompasses works from major research repositories, including WoS, PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE. We discuss rehabilitation techniques, the structure of public and private datasets, and the challenges of automated ASD detection, classification, and therapy by highlighting emerging trends, gaps, and future research directions. Among the most interesting findings of this review are the relevance of questionnaires and genetics in the early detection of ASD, as well as the prevalence of datasets that are biased toward specific genders, ethnicities, or geographic locations, restricting their applicability. This document serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders, promoting a deeper understanding and advancement of AI applications in the evaluation and management of ASD.

Background: Recently, machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP) have provided promising results in the free-form radiological reports’ classification in the respective medical domain. In order to classify radiological reports properly, a high-quality annotated and curated dataset is required. Currently, no publicly available breast imaging-based radiological dataset exists for the classification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories and breast density scores, as characterized by the American College of Radiology (ACR). To tackle this problem, we construct and annotate a breast imaging-based radiological reports dataset and its benchmark results. The dataset was originally in Spanish. Board-certified radiologists collected and annotated it according to the BI-RADS lexicon and categories at the Breast Radiology department, TecSalud Hospitals Monterrey, Mexico. Initially, it was translated into English language using Google Translate. Afterwards, it was preprocessed by removing duplicates and missing values. After preprocessing, the final dataset consists of 5046 unique reports from 5046 patients with an average age of 53 years and 100% women. Furthermore, we used word-level NLP-based embedding techniques, term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and word2vec to extract semantic and syntactic information. We also compared the performance of ML, DL and large language models (LLMs) classifiers for BI-RADS category classification. Results: The final breast imaging-based radiological reports dataset contains 5046 unique reports. We compared K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient-Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and Biomedical Generative Pre-trained Transformer (BioGPT) classifiers. It is observed that the BioGPT classifier with preprocessed data performed 6% better with a mean sensitivity of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.391-0.812) compared to the second best performing classifier BERT, which achieved mean sensitivity of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.477-0.607). Conclusion: In this work, we propose a curated and annotated benchmark dataset that can be used for BI-RADS and breast density category classification. We also provide baseline results of most ML, DL and LLMs models for BI-RADS classification that can be used as a starting point for future investigation. The main objective of this investigation is to provide a repository for the investigators who wish to enter the field to push the boundaries further.