Shugo Mizuno

Prof. Dr. Shugo Mizuno

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 February 2012 in World Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ATAkihiro Tanemura
Akihiro Tanemura
SMShugo Mizuno
Shugo Mizuno
HWHideo Wada
Hideo Wada
TYTomomi Yamada
Tomomi Yamada
TNTsutomu Nobori
Tsutomu Nobori
SIShuji Isaji
Shuji Isaji

18 February 2022 in Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YHYuki Homma
Yuki Homma
IEItaru Endo
Itaru Endo
RMRyusei Matsuyama
Ryusei Matsuyama
MSMasayuki Sho
Masayuki Sho
SMShugo Mizuno
Shugo Mizuno
MYMasakazu Yamamoto
Masakazu Yamamoto

5 March 2018 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAoi Hayasaki
Aoi Hayasaki
Shuji IsajiShuji Isaji
Shuji Isaji
MKMasashi Kishiwada
Masashi Kishiwada
TFTakehiro Fujii
Takehiro Fujii
YIYusuke Iizawa
Yusuke Iizawa
HSHiroyuki Sakurai
Hiroyuki Sakurai
Background: The aim of this study was to validate a new definition of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) provided by the 2017 international consensus on the basis of three dimensions of anatomical (A), biological (B), and conditional (C) factors, using the data of the patients who had been registered for our institutional protocol of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRTS) for localized patients with PDAC. Methods: Among 307 consecutive patients pathologically diagnosed with localized PDAC who were enrolled in our CRTS protocol from February 2005 to December 2016, we selected 285 patients who could be re-evaluated after CRT. These 285 patients were classified according to international consensus A definitions as follows: R (resectable; n = 62), BR-PV (borderline resectable, superior mesenteric vein (SMV)/portal vein (PV) involvement alone; n = 27), BR-A (borderline resectable, arterial involvement; n = 50), LA (locally advanced; n = 146). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed according to A, B (serum CA 19-9 levels and lymph node metastasis diagnosed by computed tomography findings before CRT), and C factors (performance status (PS)) factors. Results: The rates of resection and R0 resection were similar between R (83.9 and 98.0%) and BR-PV (85.2 and 95.5%), but much lower in BR-A (70.0 and 84.8%) and LA (46.6 and 62.5%). DSS evaluated by median survival time (months) showed a similar trend to surgical outcomes: 33.7 in R, 27.3 in BR-PV, 18.9 in BR-A and 19.3 in LA, respectively. DSS in R patients with CA 19-9 levels > 500 U/mL was significantly poorer than in patients with CA 19-9 levels ≤ 500 U/mL, but there were no differences in DSS among BR-PV, BR-A, and LA patients according to CA 19-9 levels. Regarding lymph node metastasis, there was no significant difference in DSS according to each resectability group. DSS in R patients with PS ≥ 2 was significantly worse than in patients with PS 0-1. Conclusions: The international consensus on the definition of BR-PDAC based on three dimensions of A, B, and C is useful and practicable because prognosis of PDAC patients is influenced by anatomical factors as well as biological and conditional factors, which in turn may help to decide treatment strategy.

1 April 2014 in Pancreas
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMotoyuki Kobayashi
Motoyuki Kobayashi
SMShugo Mizuno
Shugo Mizuno
YMYasuhiro Murata
Yasuhiro Murata
MKMasashi Kishiwada
Masashi Kishiwada
MUMasanobu Usui
Masanobu Usui
SIShuji Isaji
Shuji Isaji
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (gem-CRTS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) for borderline resectable (BR) and locally unresectable (UR) tumors. One hundred patients with PDAC who underwent the gem-CRTS protocol were classified into 3 groups, namely, resectable (R; 14), BR (44), and UR (42). After chemoradiotherapy, the patients were reassessed for curative-intent resection. At reassessment, distant metastases became apparent in 27% of R patients, in 12% of BR patients, and in 18% of UR patients. The multivariate analysis of preoperative factors indicated that the CA19-9 reduction rate was an independent prognostic factor in the BR group. Among reassessed patients, the resection rate was 63.6% in R, 83.7% in BR, and 50.0% in UR patients. In 63 patients that underwent curative-intent resection, the 3-year survival rate was 83.3% in R, 33.0% in BR, and 7.8% in UR patients. Using multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factor was found to be the surgical margin in BR patients and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression in UR patients. We consider that our gem-CRTS protocol, even for locally UR PDAC, allows for the identification of candidates for aggressive resection at the time of reassessment and improved prognosis in the patients with positive human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression.

1 June 2014 in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMShugo Mizuno
Shugo Mizuno
SIShuji Isaji
Shuji Isaji
ATAkihiro Tanemura
Akihiro Tanemura
MKMasashi Kishiwada
Masashi Kishiwada
YMYasuhiro Murata
Yasuhiro Murata
MTMasami Tabata
Masami Tabata

12 June 2014 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRyosuke Desaki
Ryosuke Desaki
SMShugo Mizuno
Shugo Mizuno
ATAkihiro Tanemura
Akihiro Tanemura
MKMasashi Kishiwada
Masashi Kishiwada
YMYasuhiro Murata
Yasuhiro Murata
SIShuji Isaji
Shuji Isaji
For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head and/or body invading the splenic artery (SA), we developed a new surgical technique of proximal subtotal pancreatectomy with splenic artery and vein resection, so-called pancreaticoduodenectomy with splenic artery resection (PD-SAR). We retrospectively reviewed a total of 84 patients with curative intent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC of the head and/or body. These 84 patients were classified into the two groups: conventional PD (n=66) and PD-SAR (n=18). Most patients were treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Postoperative MDCT clearly demonstrated enhancement of the remnant pancreas at 1 and 6 months in all patients examined. Overall survival rates were very similar between PD and PD-SAR (3-year OS: 23.7% versus 23.1%,P=0.538), despite the fact that the tumor size and the percentages of UICC-T4 determined before treatment were higher in PD-SAR. Total daily insulin dose was significantly higher in PD-SAR than in PD at 1 month, while showing no significant differences between the two groups thereafter. PD-SAR with preoperative CRT seems to be promising surgical strategy for PDAC of head and/or body with invasion of the splenic artery, in regard to the balance between operative radicality and postoperative QOL.