Hubertus Axer

Prof. Dr. Hubertus Axer

Jena University Hospital, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMarkus Axer
Markus Axer
KAKatrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts
DGDavid Grässel
David Grässel
Christoph PalmChristoph Palm
Christoph Palm
JDJürgen Dammers
Jürgen Dammers
KZKarl Zilles
Karl Zilles

1 August 2003 in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAlireza Ghassemi
Alireza Ghassemi
APAndreas Prescher
Andreas Prescher
DRDieter Riediger
Dieter Riediger
Hubertus AxerHubertus Axer
Hubertus Axer

1 March 2001 in Journal of Surgical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hubertus AxerHubertus Axer
Hubertus Axer
DKDiedrich Graf V. Keyserlingk
Diedrich Graf V. Keyserlingk
APAndreas Prescher
Andreas Prescher

1 May 2010 in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hubertus AxerHubertus Axer
Hubertus Axer
MAMartina Axer
Martina Axer
HSHeinrich Sauer
Heinrich Sauer
OWOtto Witte
Otto Witte
GHGeorg Hagemann
Georg Hagemann

7 October 2013 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAlexander Grimm
Alexander Grimm
UTUlrike Teschner
Ulrike Teschner
CPChristine Porzelius
Christine Porzelius
KLKatrin Ludewig
Katrin Ludewig
JZJörg Zielske
Jörg Zielske
Hubertus AxerHubertus Axer
Hubertus Axer
Introduction: Muscle ultrasound is emerging as a promising tool in the diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases. The current observational study evaluates the usefulness of muscle ultrasound in patients with severe sepsis for assessment of critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy (CINM) in the intensive care unit. Methods: 28 patients with either septic shock or severe sepsis underwent clinical neurological examinations, muscle ultrasound, and nerve conduction studies on days 4 and 14 after onset of sepsis. 26 healthy controls of comparable age underwent clinical neurological evaluation and muscle ultrasound only. Results: 26 of the 28 patients exhibited classic electrophysiological characteristics of CINM, and all showed typical clinical signs. Ultrasonic echogenicity of muscles was graded semiquantitatively and fasciculations were evaluated in muscles of proximal and distal arms and legs. 75% of patients showed a mean echotexture greater than 1.5, which was the maximal value found in the control group. A significant difference in mean muscle echotexture between patients and controls was found at day 4 and day 14 (both p < 0.001). In addition, from day 4 to day 14, the mean grades of muscle echotexture increased in the patient group, although the values did not reach significance levels (p = 0.085). Controls revealed the lowest number of fasciculations. In the patients group, fasciculations were detected in more muscular regions (lower and upper arm and leg) in comparison to controls (p = 0.08 at day 4 and p = 0.002 at day 14). Conclusions: Muscle ultrasound represents an easily applicable, non-invasive diagnostic tool which adds to neurophysiological testing information regarding morphological changes of muscles early in the course of sepsis. Muscle ultrasound could be useful for screening purposes prior to subjecting patients to more invasive techniques such as electromyography and/or muscle biopsy. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID:DRKS00000642.

1 January 2000 in Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hubertus AxerHubertus Axer
Hubertus Axer
DKDiedrich Graf V Keyserlingk
Diedrich Graf V Keyserlingk