Huicui Meng

Dr. Huicui Meng

Sun Yat-sen University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNirupa R. Matthan
Nirupa R. Matthan
LALynne M Ausman
Lynne M Ausman
HMHuicui Meng
Huicui Meng
HTHocine Tighiouart
Hocine Tighiouart
ALAlice H Lichtenstein
Alice H Lichtenstein
Background: The utility of glycemic index (GI) values for chronic disease risk management remains controversial. Although absolute GI value determinat

1 April 2017 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHuicui Meng
Huicui Meng
NMNirupa R Matthan
Nirupa R Matthan
LALynne M Ausman
Lynne M Ausman
ALAlice H Lichtenstein
Alice H Lichtenstein
Background: The potential confounding effect of different amounts and proportions of macronutrients across eating patterns on meal or dietary glycemi

10 June 2019 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHuicui Meng
Huicui Meng
NMNirupa R Matthan
Nirupa R Matthan
DWDayong Wu
Dayong Wu
LLLijun Li
Lijun Li
Jose Rodríguez-MoratóJose Rodríguez-Morató
Jose Rodríguez-Morató
ALAlice H Lichtenstein
Alice H Lichtenstein
Direct comparisons between SFAs varying in chain length, specifically palmitic acid (16:0) and stearic acid (18:0), relative to the latter's metabolic product, oleic acid (18:1), on cardiometabolic risk factors are limited. The aim of this study was to determine the relative comparability of diets enriched in palmitic acid, stearic acid, and oleic acid on inflammation and coagulation markers, T lymphocyte proliferation/ex-vivo cytokine secretion, plasma cardiometabolic risk factors, and fecal bile acid concentrations. Hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women (n = 20, mean ± SD age 64 ± 7 y, BMI 26.4 ± 3.4 kg/m2, LDL cholesterol ≥ 2.8 mmol/L) were provided with each of 3 diets [55% energy (%E) carbohydrate, 15%E protein, 30%E fat, with ∼50% fat contributed by palmitic acid, stearic acid, or oleic acid in each diet; 5 wk/diet phase] using a randomized crossover design with 2-wk washouts between phases. Outcome measures were assessed at the end of each phase. Fasting LDL-cholesterol and non–HDL-cholesterol concentrations were lower after the stearic acid and oleic acid diets than the palmitic acid diet (all P < 0.01). Fasting HDL-cholesterol concentrations were lower after the stearic acid diet than the palmitic acid and oleic acid diets (P < 0.01). The stearic acid diet resulted in lower lithocholic acid (P = 0.01) and total secondary bile acid (SBA) concentrations (P = 0.04) than the oleic acid diet. All other outcome measures were similar between diets. Lithocholic acid concentrations were positively correlated with fasting LDL-cholesterol concentrations (r = 0.33; P = 0.011). Total SBA, lithocholic acid, and deoxycholic acid concentrations were negatively correlated with fasting HDL cholesterol (r = −0.51 to −0.44; P < 0.01) concentrations and positively correlated with LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol (r = 0.37–0.54; P < 0.01) ratios. Dietary stearic acid and oleic acid had similar effects on fasting LDL-cholesterol and non–HDL-cholesterol concentrations and more favorable ones than palmitic acid. Unlike oleic acid, the hypocholesterolemic effect of stearic acid may be mediated by inhibition of intestinal hydrophobic SBA synthesis. These findings add to the data suggesting there should be a reassessment of current SFA dietary guidance and Nutrient Facts panel labeling. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02145936.

1 November 2017 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHuicui Meng
Huicui Meng
NMNirupa R Matthan
Nirupa R Matthan
LALynne M Ausman
Lynne M Ausman
ALAlice H Lichtenstein
Alice H Lichtenstein
Background: The potential impact of prior meal composition on the postprandial glycemic response and glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) value

1 August 2019 in Cancer Prevention Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WTWilliam Turbitt
William Turbitt
YXYitong Xu
Yitong Xu
DSDonna M. Sosnoski
Donna M. Sosnoski
SCShawntawnee D. Collins
Shawntawnee D. Collins
HMHuicui Meng
Huicui Meng
CRConnie J. Rogers
Connie J. Rogers
Physical activity and the prevention of weight gain decrease breast cancer incidence and improve survival. Unraveling the biological mechanisms underlying these cancer prevention effects is difficult because activity and dietary restriction are often linked. The goal of this study was to determine whether physical activity (PA), preventing weight gain via energy restriction (ER), or the combination was most effective in delaying tumor growth, reducing metastatic progression, and improving survival in the 4T1.2 mammary tumor model. Furthermore, we determined whether any of these interventions prevented the expansion of protumor immunosuppressive cells and altered the tumor microenvironment (TME). Female BALB/c mice (n = 7–20/group) were randomized to sedentary (SED) or PA wheel cages and fed ad libitum (AL) or 90% of control food intake (ER). After 8 weeks on the interventions, mice were inoculated with 5 × 104 4T1.2luc cells into the 4th mammary fat pad and continued on their respective intervention. PA+ER significantly delayed primary tumor growth (final tumor volume, 0.193 ± 0.042 vs. 0.369 ± 0.049 cm3, P < 0.001), reduced metastatic burden in the lungs (0.72 ± 0.36 vs. 16.27 ± 6.98, P = 0.054) and increased survival (median survival, 68 vs 40 days, P = 0.043) compared with SED+AL mice. PA+ER also reduced the expression level of metastatic and immunosuppressive genes and resulted in favorable changes in immune cell infiltrates in the tumor. These data suggest that both PA and ER are needed to reduce tumor growth, delay metastatic progression, and improve survival, and that this protection is associated with changes in immune-mediated mechanisms.

30 November 2015 in European Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHuicui Meng
Huicui Meng
ZBZhaoyong Ba
Zhaoyong Ba
YLYujin Lee
Yujin Lee
JPJiayu Peng
Jiayu Peng
JLJunli Lin
Junli Lin
CRConnie J. Rogers
Connie J. Rogers