Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

Objective: Minimally invasive procedures have been developed to reduce surgical trauma after cardiac surgery. Clinical recovery is the main focus of most research. Still, patient-centred outcomes, such as the quality of life, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the surgery on the patient’s life. This systematic review aims to deliver a detailed summary of all available research investigating the quality of recovery, assessed with quality of life instruments, in adults undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Methods: All randomised trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies assessing the quality of recovery in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery compared to conventional cardiac surgery within the last 20 years were included, and a summary was prepared. Results: The randomised trial observed an overall improved quality of life after both minimally invasive and conventional surgery. The quality of life improvement in the minimally invasive group showed a faster course and evolved to a higher level than the conventional surgery group. These findings align with the results of prospective cohort studies. In the cross-sectional studies, no significant difference in the quality of life was seen except for one that observed a significantly higher quality of life in the minimally invasive group. Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that patients may benefit from minimally invasive and conventional cardiac surgery, but patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery may recover sooner and to a greater extent. However, no firm conclusion could be drawn due to the limited available studies. Therefore, randomised controlled trials are needed.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines redefined exercise pulmonary hypertension as a mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope >3 mm Hg·L ⁻¹ ·min ⁻¹ . A peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure >60 mm Hg during exercise has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, heart failure rehospitalization, and aortic valve replacement in aortic valve stenosis. The prognostic value of the mPAP/CO slope in aortic valve stenosis remains unknown. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients (n=143; age, 73±11 years) with an aortic valve area ≤1.5 cm ² underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with echocardiography. They were subsequently evaluated for the occurrence of cardiovascular events (ie, cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and aortic valve replacement) during a follow-up period of 1 year. Findings were externally validated (validation cohort, n=141). RESULTS: One cardiovascular death, 32 aortic valve replacements, 9 new-onset atrial fibrillation episodes, and 4 heart failure hospitalizations occurred in the derivation cohort, whereas 5 cardiovascular deaths, 32 aortic valve replacements, 1 new-onset atrial fibrillation episode, and 10 heart failure hospitalizations were observed in the validation cohort. Peak aortic velocity (odds ratio [OR] per SD, 1.48; P =0.036), indexed left atrial volume (OR per SD, 2.15; P =0.001), E/e’ at rest (OR per SD, 1.61; P =0.012), mPAP/CO slope (OR per SD, 2.01; P =0.002), and age-, sex-, and height-based predicted peak exercise oxygen uptake (OR per SD, 0.59; P =0.007) were independently associated with cardiovascular events at 1 year, whereas peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was not (OR per SD, 1.28; P =0.219). Peak V o ₂ (percent) and mPAP/CO slope provided incremental prognostic value in addition to indexed left atrial volume and aortic valve area ( P <0.001). These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In moderate and severe aortic valve stenosis, mPAP/CO slope and percent-predicted peak V o ₂ were independent predictors of cardiovascular events, whereas peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was not. In addition to aortic valve area and indexed left atrial volume, percent-predicted peak V o ₂ and mPAP/CO slope cumulatively improved risk stratification.

OBJECTIVES: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) is a minimally invasive approach to achieve surgical revascularization through a minimally invasive approach. Still, data regarding non-robotic TECAB are limited. This report presents the results of a TECAB technique using long-shafted instruments, defined as Endo-CABG, from a single-centre experience in 1500 consecutive patients. METHODS: One thousand and five hundred patients underwent Endo-CABG between January 2016 and February 2023. Data were collected retrospectively, and patients were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome of this study was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)-free survival. Secondary efficacy outcomes were graft failure and mortality. Furthermore, we analysed factors influencing long-term freedom from MACCE and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The mean age was 68 [61–75] years, of which 193 (12.87%) were octogenarians. Multivessel disease was present in 1409 (93.93%) patients, and the mean EuroSCORE II was 1.64 [1.09–2.92] %. All patients underwent full arterial revascularization with bilateral internal mammary grafting in 88.47%. Graft failure occurred in 1.80% of cases after 1 year (n = 27). Thirty-day mortality was 1.73% (n = 26), 1-year survival was 94.7% (95% CI: 93.5–95.9%; n = 26) and 1-year MACCE-free survival was 91.7% (95% CI: 90.2–93.2%). Age, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial hypertension and urgency were significantly associated with 1-year MACCE-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Endo-CABG appears to be a safe procedure, achieves surgical revascularization and provides good outcomes regarding graft failure and MACCE at 1 year, while age, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial hypertension and urgency were associated with 1-year outcomes.

Over the past years, minimally invasive procedures have been developed to reduce surgical trauma after cardiac surgery. The value of patient-centered outcomes, including the quality of recovery after hospital discharge, is increasingly recognized. Identifying meaningful changes in postoperative function that might have a negative impact on patients without noticeable complications can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact on the patient’s life. In total, 209 patients were included in this trial. Of these, 193 patients underwent totally endoscopic cardiac surgery, 8 underwent cardiac surgery through a sternotomy, and 8 underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Patients who previously underwent cardiac surgery were excluded. Quality of life was determined through the Short Form 36 and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaires before the surgery and 14, 30, and 90 days afterward. In patients who underwent totally endoscopic cardiac surgery, the quality of life improved over the three time periods. The different domains of the questionnaire evolved in a positive manner. However, 14 days postoperatively, a decline in quality of life was noted, followed by a return to baseline at 30 days and an increase at 90 days. In conclusion, totally endoscopic cardiac surgery improves the quality of life 90 days after surgery.