Augmented reality technology had developed rapidly in recent years and had been applied in many fields, including medical education. Augmented reality had potential to improve students’ knowledge and skills in medical education. This scoping review primarily aims to further elaborate the current studies on the implementation of augmented reality in advancing clinical skills. This study was conducted by utilizing electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in June 2022 for articles focusing on the use of augmented reality for improving clinical skills. The Rayyan website was used to screen the articles that met the inclusion criteria, which was the application of augmented reality as a learning method in medical education. Total of 37 articles met the inclusion criteria. These publications suggested that using augmented reality could improve clinical skills. The most researched topics explored were laparoscopic surgery skills and ophthalmology were the most studied topic. The research methods applied in the articles fall into two main categories: randomized control trial (RCT) (29.3%) and non-RCT (70.3%). Augmented reality has the potential to be integrated in medical education, particularly to boost clinical studies. Due to limited databases, however, any further studies on the implementation of augmented reality as a method to enhance skills in medical education need to be conducted.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have an impact on geriatric patients worldwide since geriatrics itself is an age group with a high risk due to declined physiological function and many comorbidities, especially for those who undergo surgery. In this study, we determine the association between perioperative factors with 30-day mortality and a survival rate of geriatric patients undergoing surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at 14 central hospitals in Indonesia. The recorded variables were perioperative factors, 30-day mortality, and survival rate. Analyses of associations between variables and 30-day mortality were performed using univariate/multivariable logistic regression, and survival rates were determined with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results: We analyzed 1621 elderly patients. The total number of patients who survived within 30 days of observation was 4.3%. Several perioperative factors were associated with 30-day mortality (p < 0.05) is COVID-19 (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.04–18.07; p = 0.04), CCI > 3 ( odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–5.26; p = 0.04), emergency surgery (OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.96–7.00; p ≤ 0.01), postoperative ICU care (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.32–5.53; p = 0.01), and adverse events (AEs) in the ICU (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.32–8.96; p = 0.01). Aligned with these findings, COVID-19, CCI > 3, and comorbidities have a log-rank p < 0.05. The six comorbidities that have log-rank p < 0.05 are moderate-to-severe renal disease (log-rank p ≤ 0.01), cerebrovascular disease (log-rank p ≤ 0.01), diabetes with chronic complications (log-rank p = 0.03), metastatic solid tumor (log-rank p = 0.02), dementia (log-rank p ≤ 0.01), and rheumatology disease (log-rank p = 0.03). Conclusions: Having at least one of these conditions, such as COVID-19, comorbidities, emergency surgery, postoperative ICU care, or an AE in the ICU were associated with increased mortality in geriatric patients undergoing surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Many questionnaires have been widely used to assess patient satisfaction. One of them is the Pediatric Anesthesia Parent Satisfaction (PAPS) questionnaire. However, in Indonesia, the parent satisfaction of pediatric patients undergoing surgery has never been studied. Knowing patient satisfaction can provide feedback to improve the quality of anesthesia services. Furthermore, the PAPS questionnaire has never been used in Indonesia, so it needs to be translated and tested for validity and reliability before being implemented in Indonesia. Aim: to validate the Indonesian version of the PAPS questionnaire Method: This study uses a descriptive-analytic method with a cross-sectional design. The PAPS Questionnaire was translated into Indonesian version with the following steps (1) forward translation, (2) establish an expert committee, and (3) backward translation. After that, pilot testing and FGD with the expert were conducted to obtain the final questionnaire. Pearson’s correlation and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed for the validity test. Sampling measurement before CFA was carried out with Keyser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s test. Cronbach's alpha determined the reliability test evaluation. Result: Total number of subjects is 125 subjects. The PAPS questionnaire in the Indonesian version was obtained with help from INCULS and an anesthesiologist expert. Pearson's correlation found that all items ranged from r = 0.531-0.796 with p < 0.001. The CFA showed two factors that explained 65% of the total variance, with KMO being 0.937 (X2=1283.452, p < 0.001). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.937. Conclusion: Indonesian version of the PAPS questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing parents' satisfaction with the anesthesia services their child received.

This study aimed to explore the perspectives of care and protection of healthcare workers during the pandemic COVID-19 using a descriptive qualitative study in Indonesia. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach in COVID-19 National Referral Hospitals. Purposive sampling was used to collect the sample. There were 45 respondents, with 22 men and 23 women taking part in this study. The qualitative data were analyzed using the content analysis. Three themes that emerge from the data analysis: health protection, legal protection, and incentive schemes. Health protection including calculation of the medical team's workload and lack of a systematic procedure for medical team quarantine. There was a lack of legal basis for medical practice in long-term disaster services. Dimension of incentive scheme, including incentives shift from rewards to demands, changes in incentive regulations, and discrepancy in incentive calculation. By stressing protection and rewards for each level of the medical profession, it is hoped to boost motivation in actively participating and supporting the service of COVID-19 patients in critical conditions across Indonesia.

Background As life expectancy increases, the worldwide population aged 60 years and older increases year by year. Consequently, more older people receive medical attention, especially those who undergo surgery. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a global impact on elderly patients, especially those undergoing surgery. This study aims to describe the characteristics and analyze the survival rate of elderly patients who receive anesthesia services, especially those with comorbidities and COVID-19. Methods A prospective cohort study at 14 central hospitals in Indonesia analyzed 1621 elderly patients (67.1 ± 6.2 years old). The variables that were recorded included patient characteristics, comorbidities, the COVID-19 status, and the survival rate, including 30-day mortality. Results The 30-day mortality was 4.4%. The most comorbidity was hypertension (30.0). Patients with a Charlson's Comorbidity Index Score of 3-4 had a higher death rate (15.3%). The highest mortality rates were in the patients who had dementia, rheumatologic disease, liver disease, previous myocardial infarction, and diabetes with chronic complications as comorbidities. The percent of patients with COVID-19 who died was 26.6%. Patients with several comorbidities and COVID-19 had a lower survival rate than those without (log-rank p<0.05) Conclusion Approximately four in ten elderly patients receiving anesthesia died, and the percent increased when the patients had comorbidities and COVID-19.

Introduction: APACHE IV was a good predictor of ICU length of stay in the USA and some countries outside the USA but poor in others. It is important to develop a scoring system for the Indonesian population, especially in this scope, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital. To develop such a scoring system, it is reasonable to study the validity of APACHE IV in ICU Dr. Sardjito General Hospital for predicting prolonged length of stay. Methods: A retrospective cohort observational study using data from January 1^st, 2020, to December 31^st, 2020, taken from the ICU of Dr. Sardjito General Hospital. The data are the patient's observed ICU LOS and data required in calculating APACHE IV score and ICU LOS prediction. Discrimination is calculated using the area under (AUC) the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Samples were 329 patients. APACHE IV ICU length of stay prediction showed moderate discriminatory ability (AUC-ROC: 0.74) and poor calibration (p <0.001) to predict prolonged ICU stay. The APACHE IV score has a strong discriminatory ability (AUC-ROC: 0.83). Using the DeLong method, the AUC from ROC APACHE IV score was greater than the AUC from ROC predicted length of stay in APACHE IV ICU (p <0.001). APACHE IV predicted ICU length of stay overestimated observed ICU length of stay. Conclusion: APACHE IV ICU length of stay prediction has moderate discrimination and poor calibration to predict prolonged ICU stay. The APACHE IV score has better discrimination than the APACHE IV ICU length of stay prediction in predicting prolonged ICU stay.