Xingyu Jiang

Ms. Xingyu Jiang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CXChenqin Xiong
Chenqin Xiong
Tarek ZayedTarek Zayed
Tarek Zayed
XJXingyu Jiang
Xingyu Jiang
Ghasan AlfalahGhasan Alfalah
Ghasan Alfalah
EAEslam Abdlekader
Eslam Abdlekader
Surface cracks are alluded to as one of the early signs of potential damage to infrastructures. In the same vein, their detection is an imperative task to preserve the structural health and safety of bridges. Human-based visual inspection is acknowledged as the most prevalent means of assessing infrastructures’ performance conditions. Nonetheless, it is unreliable, tedious, hazardous, and labor-intensive. This state of affairs calls for the development of a novel YOLOv8-AFPN-MPD-IoU model for instance segmentation and quantification of bridge surface cracks. Firstly, YOLOv8s-Seg is selected as the backbone network to carry out instance segmentation. In addition, an asymptotic feature pyramid network (AFPN) is incorporated to ameliorate feature fusion and overall performance. Thirdly, the minimum point distance (MPD) is introduced as a loss function as a way to better explore the geometric features of surface cracks. Finally, the middle aisle transformation is amalgamated with Euclidean distance to compute the length and width of segmented cracks. Analytical comparisons reveal that this developed deep learning network surpasses several contemporary models, including YOLOv8n, YOLOv8s, YOLOv8m, YOLOv8l, and Mask-RCNN. The YOLOv8s + AFPN + MPDIoU model attains a precision rate of 90.7%, a recall of 70.4%, an F1-score of 79.27%, mAP50 of 75.3%, and mAP75 of 74.80%. In contrast to alternative models, our proposed approach exhibits enhancements across performance metrics, with the F1-score, mAP50, and mAP75 increasing by a minimum of 0.46%, 1.3%, and 1.4%, respectively. The margin of error in the measurement model calculations is maintained at or below 5%. Therefore, the developed model can serve as a useful tool for the accurate characterization and quantification of different types of bridge surface cracks.