Jonathan Steinberg

Mr. Jonathan Steinberg

Educational Testing Service, Princeton, Florida, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 May 2014 in Educational Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TOTenaha O’rEilly
Tenaha O’rEilly
JWJonathan Weeks
Jonathan Weeks
JSJohn Sabatini
John Sabatini
LHLaura Halderman
Laura Halderman
JSJonathan Steinberg
Jonathan Steinberg

16 September 2023 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJessica Andrews-Todd
Jessica Andrews-Todd
YJYang Jiang
Yang Jiang
JSJonathan Steinberg
Jonathan Steinberg
SPSamuel L. Pugh
Samuel L. Pugh
SDSidney K. D'MEllo
Sidney K. D'MEllo

4 July 2022 in Journal of Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJessica Andrews-Todd
Jessica Andrews-Todd
JSJonathan Steinberg
Jonathan Steinberg
MFMichael M Flor
Michael M Flor
CFCarolyn M. Forsyth
Carolyn M. Forsyth
Competency in skills associated with collaborative problem solving (CPS) is critical for many contexts, including school, the workplace, and the military. Innovative approaches for assessing individuals’ CPS competency are necessary, as traditional assessment types such as multiple -choice items are not well suited for such a process-oriented competency. In a move to computer-based environments to support CPS assessment, innovative computational approaches are also needed to understand individuals’ CPS behaviors. In the current study, we describe the use of a simulation-based task on electronics concepts as an environment for higher education students to display evidence of their CPS competency. We further describe computational linguistic methods for automatically characterizing students’ display of various CPS skills in the task. Comparisons between such an automated approach and an approach based on human annotation to characterize student CPS behaviors revealed above average agreement. These results give credence to the potential for automated approaches to help advance the assessment of CPS and to circumvent the time-intensive human annotation approaches that are typically used in these contexts.

1 January 2012 in Choice Reviews Online
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJonathan Steinberg
Jonathan Steinberg

20 November 2014 in ETS Research Report Series
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJonathan Steinberg
Jonathan Steinberg
MBMeghan Brenneman
Meghan Brenneman
KCKaren Castellano
Karen Castellano
PLPeng Lin
Peng Lin
SMSusanne Miller
Susanne Miller
Test providers are increasingly moving toward exclusively administering assessments by computer. Computerized testing is becoming more desirable for test takers because of increased opportunities to test, faster turnaround of individual scores, or perhaps other factors, offering potential benefits for those who may be struggling to pass licensure examinations. This report extends previous research examining 4 years of paper‐based Praxis I® test data to its corresponding computerized environment with these goals: (a) determine the extent to which achievement gaps exist on computer‐based (CB) Praxis I tests, (b) examine which test‐taker characteristics are most associated with mode, and (c) elicit opinions from previous Praxis I test takers to understand reasons why a particular testing mode was chosen. The results contribute to the literature about Praxis® examinations and reinforce the need to understand their dynamics in the context of evaluating performance and participation gaps by demographic characteristics.

2 December 2020 in ETS Research Report Series
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJonathan Steinberg
Jonathan Steinberg
JAJessica Andrews‐Todd
Jessica Andrews‐Todd
CFCarolyn Forsyth
Carolyn Forsyth
JCJohn Chamberlain
John Chamberlain
PHPaul Horwitz
Paul Horwitz
LMLaura McCulla
Laura McCulla