Jonathan Cullen

Dr. Jonathan Cullen

University of Cambridge
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2021 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Felix CreutzigFelix Creutzig
Felix Creutzig
LNLeila Niamir
Leila Niamir
XBXuemei Bai
Xuemei Bai
MCMax Callaghan
Max Callaghan
JCJonathan Cullen
Jonathan Cullen
DÜDiana Ürge-Vorsatz
Diana Ürge-Vorsatz

10 May 2017 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJonathan Cullen
Jonathan Cullen

10 December 2012 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJonathan Cullen
Jonathan Cullen
JAJulian M. Allwood
Julian M. Allwood
MBMargarita D. Bambach
Margarita D. Bambach

1 May 2021 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SISamantha Islam
Samantha Islam
JCJonathan Cullen
Jonathan Cullen

2 March 2021 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWCoenraad D. Westbroek
Coenraad D. Westbroek
JBJennifer Bitting
Jennifer Bitting
MCMatteo Craglia
Matteo Craglia
JAJosé M. C. Azevedo
José M. C. Azevedo
JCJonathan Cullen
Jonathan Cullen
Global glass production grew to 150 million tonnes (Mt) in 2014, equating to approximately 21 kg per person. Producing this glass is energy intensive and contributes annual CO 2 emissions of some 86Mt. An accurate map of the global glass supply chain is needed to help identify emissions mitigation options from across the supply chain, including process energy efficiency and material efficiency options. This map does not yet exist, so we address this knowledge gap by tracing the production chain from raw materials to end of life and producing a global Sankey diagram of container and flat glass making for 2014. To understand future demand for flat glass we also model the stocks of glass in vehicles and buildings. The analysis shows the relative scale of glass flows and stocks worldwide and provides a baseline for future study of the emission mitigation potential of energy and material efficiency of manufacturing with glass.

31 January 2024 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FMFanran Meng
Fanran Meng
Miguel BrandãoMiguel Brandão
Miguel Brandão
JCJonathan Cullen
Jonathan Cullen
Plastics are controversial due to their production from fossil fuels, emissions during production and disposal, potential toxicity, and leakage to the environment. In light of these concerns, calls to use less plastic products and move toward nonplastic alternatives are common. However, these calls often overlook the environmental impacts of alternative materials. This article examines the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impact of plastic products versus their alternatives. We assess 16 applications where plastics are used across five key sectors: packaging, building and construction, automotive, textiles, and consumer durables. These sectors account for about 90% of the global plastic volume. Our results show that in 15 of the 16 applications a plastic product incurs fewer GHG emissions than their alternatives. In these applications, plastic products release 10% to 90% fewer emissions across the product life cycle. Furthermore, in some applications, such as food packaging, no suitable alternatives to plastics exist. These results demonstrate that care must be taken when formulating policies or interventions to reduce plastic use so that we do not inadvertently drive a shift to nonplastic alternatives with higher GHG emissions. For most plastic products, increasing the efficiency of plastic use, extending the lifetime, boosting recycling rates, and improving waste collection would be more effective for reducing emissions.