Background: Adolescents can be especially vulnerable to various stressors as they are still in their formative years and transitioning into adulthood. Hence, it is important for them to have effective stress management strategies. Objective: This systematic review investigates current well-being interventions that are aimed at reducing stress among young adults. In particular, interventions using the medium of virtual reality (VR) are explored. Methods: This mixed methods systematic review follows the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) guidelines, and papers were gathered from databases such as PsycINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, OpenGrey, and Edutopia. Predetermined criteria and specific keywords were used to search for the papers. Search results were screened and extracted with all article screening or extraction delegated among all authors. Any disagreements after reconciliation were settled by a third author. The quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) Tool for Quantitative Studies. Studies were analyzed qualitatively. Results: In total, 20 studies were included, and qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based interventions in 3 domains: nature, stress, and academics. Conclusions: Studies using VR interventions, overall, promoted a reduction in stress and an increase in well-being. The findings suggest that VR may serve as an accessible and affordable medium of stress reduction for students and young adults. Larger sample sizes, and a greater number of included studies, may be required in future directions.

BACKGROUNDWithin academic development, it is important for students to use effective study strategies to facilitate learning. Techniques used for long-term information retention include note taking strategies, time management, methods of self-testing and active recall. These strategies are explored to help students learn more effectively to attain their academic goals.METHODA mixed-methods systematic review of peer-review articles and grey literature was conducted with a predetermined criteria for a convergent integrated synthesis approach. PsychInfo (Ovid), Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched with guidance of a PICO-P logic grid and search strategy using keywords of student, study strategies, and achievement alongside filters. Initial studies were screened and reconciled by two independent authors with the use of a piloted screening tool. Using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT), included studies were assessed for quality. Two authors independently performed data extraction. Heterogeneity in study designs, outcomes, and measurements precluded meta and statistical analyses; thus, a qualitative analysis of studies was provided.RESULTSFour major themes contributing to academic performance were identified among the appraised articles. These themes were self-testing, scheduling/time management, concept maps, and learning styles. Self-testing, scheduling, and concept maps were positively correlated with increased academic performance, while no correlation was found with learning styles and academic performance.CONCLUSIONIncluded studies provided evidence for significant differences in study strategies implemented by high and low achieving students, such as areas of motivation for learning, efficiency, active recall, retrieval practices, and concept maps. Understanding the effectiveness of certain study strategies is critical for students and educational facilitators to maximize learning.

Melanoma is one of the most fatal skin cancers, with rising incidence and mortality worldwide. From diagnosis to treatment, patient experiences often involve anxiety, symptom burden, and limited access to information which profoundly impacts health outcomes. This systematic review aims to identify and analyze major barriers melanoma patients face throughout their healthcare journey. Studies were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, supplemented by manual hand-searching. Eligible studies focused on the experiences of melanoma patients, addressed knowledge gaps and barriers to care throughout the patient journey, and were published in English between 2013 and 2023. Screening and extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Out of 2,257 screened articles, 183 met the inclusion criteria. Studies were categorized into four major themes: intersectionality, treatment, diagnosis/prognosis, and patient/societal burden. Commonly explored subcategories included self-examination, risk factors, and drug efficacy. Melanoma patients experience significant gaps throughout their healthcare journey. Identifying areas of improvement in current practices is the first step toward developing targeted solutions that improve the patient experience and quality of life.