Lee JK, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;41(5):828-835. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.828

Background: SUBAR is a new ground walking exoskeletal robot. The objective of this study is to investigate SUBAR-assisted gait training's effects in patients with chronic stroke. Methods: This preliminary study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. Thirty adults were enrolled 6 months after the onset of stroke with functional ambulation category scores ≥ 3. Patients were randomly assigned to receive robot-assisted gait training (SUBAR group, n = 15) or conventional physiotherapy (control group, n = 15). All patients received a total of 10 treatment sessions of 30 minutes each for 3 weeks. Before and after the 10-treatment sessions, patients were evaluated. The primary outcome is the 10 meter walk test and the secondary outcomes were the functional ambulation category scale, the Motricity Index-Lower, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), timed up and go, Rivermead Mobility Index, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and gait analysis. Results: In the SUBAR group, MAS and step length were significantly improved between pre- and posttreatment measurements (Δmean ± SD: −1.1 ± 1.6 and 5.5 ± 7.6, P = .019 and .016, respectively). The SUBAR group improved the stride length and step length of the affected limb but not significantly. The control group had significant improvements in the BBS, MAS, and stride length between pre- and posttreatment measurements (Δmean ± SD: 3.5 ± 4.6, −0.8 ± 1.5, and 6.5 ± 9.5; P = .004, .031, and .035, respectively). The BBS improved more in the control group than in the SUBAR group. There were no other differences between the SUBAR group and the control group. Conclusion: Our results suggest that SUBAR-assisted gait training improved gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke. However, there was no significant difference in most outcome measures compared to conventional physiotherapy. Further research is warranted to measure the effects of SUBAR-assisted gait training.

Background: This pilot study investigated end-effector lower limb rehabilitation robot training effects in subacute stroke patients. Methods: Forty-nine stroke patients were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: a 30-minute end-effector lower limb rehabilitation robot training plus 1.5-hour conventional physiotherapy (robot group; n = 26), or a 2-hour conventional physiotherapy (control group; n = 23). All patients received 5 treatments weekly for 4 weeks. The functional ambulatory category was the primary outcome and the motricity index, Fugl Meyer assessment-lower extremity, rivermead mobility index, 10 meter walk test, Berg balance scale, and modified Barthel index were secondary outcomes. Results: All outcome measures significantly improved in both groups after training (P > .05). The robot group improved more in FAC than the control group (P = .005). Conclusions: Compared with conventional physiotherapy alone, end-effector lower limb robot-assisted gait training with conventional physiotherapy improved subacute stroke patients walking ability.

Choi CM, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Oct;40(5):826-834. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.826

Han Y, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Oct;40(5):871-877. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.871

Background: The effect of robot-assisted gait training has been demonstrated to improve gait recovery in patients with stroke. The aim of this study was to determine effects of robot-assisted gait training with various training modes in patients post stroke. Methods: Forty-seven patients post stroke were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups: Healbot T with pelvic off mode (pelvic off group; n = 11); Healbot T with pelvic control mode (pelvic on group; n = 12); Healbot T with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) mode (CIMT group; n = 10); and conventional physiotherapy (control group; n = 10). All patients received a 30-minute session 10 times for 4 weeks. The primary outcomes were the 10-meter walk test (10MWT) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The secondary outcomes were functional ambulation category, timed up and go (TUG), and motricity index of the lower extremities (MI-Lower). Results: The pelvic off group showed significant improvements in BBS, TUG, and MI-Lower (P < .05). The pelvic on and CIMT groups showed significant improvement in 10MWT, BBS, TUG, and MI-Lower (P < .05). Compared with control group, the pelvic on group showed greater improvement in the TUG and BBS scores; the CIMT group showed greater improvement in 10MWT and MI-Lower (P < .05). Conclusion: This study suggested that Healbot T-assisted gait training benefited patients with stroke. The Healbot T with pelvic motion and CIMT modes were more helpful in improving balance and walking ability and lower limb strength, respectively, compared with conventional physiotherapy.