Katie Flanagan

Prof. Katie Flanagan

University of Tasmania
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 October 2018 in Seminars in Immunopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RVRavichandra Vemuri
Ravichandra Vemuri
KSKristyn Sylvia
Kristyn Sylvia
SKSabra L. Klein
Sabra L. Klein
SFSamuel Forster
Samuel Forster
Magdalena PlebanskiMagdalena Plebanski
Magdalena Plebanski
Katie FlanaganKatie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan

10 September 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJennifer R. Habel
Jennifer R. Habel
TNThi Hoang Oanh Nguyen
Thi Hoang Oanh Nguyen
Carolien Emma van de SandtCarolien Emma van de Sandt
Carolien Emma van de Sandt
JJJennifer Juno
Jennifer Juno
PCPriyanka Chaurasia
Priyanka Chaurasia
KKKatherine Kedzierska
Katherine Kedzierska
Significance: As the recall of CD8 + T cell memory promotes rapid recovery in, for example, influenza, we investigated circulating SARS-CoV-2−specific CD8 + T cells from COVID-19 patients. For two HLA-A*02:01 SARS-CoV-2−specific CD8 + T cell epitopes, we found that, while ex vivo frequencies of responding T cells were approximately fivefold higher than for pre−COVID-19 samples, they were ∼10-fold lower than for influenza or EBV-specific memory CD8 + T cells. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2−specific CD8 + T cells recovered from convalescent COVID-19 patients had an atypically high prevalence of stem cell memory, central memory, and naïve phenotypes. Might this unexpectedly low prevalence of classical effector memory T cells be a negative consequence of the infectious process that could be avoided by prior priming with an appropriately constituted vaccine?

1 April 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKevin J. Selva
Kevin J. Selva
Carolien Emma van de SandtCarolien Emma van de Sandt
Carolien Emma van de Sandt
MLMelissa M. Lemke
Melissa M. Lemke
CLChristina Y. Lee
Christina Y. Lee
SSSuzanne K. Shoffner
Suzanne K. Shoffner
ACAmy W. Chung
Amy W. Chung
The hallmarks of COVID-19 are higher pathogenicity and mortality in the elderly compared to children. Examining baseline SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive immunological responses, induced by circulating human coronaviruses (hCoVs), is needed to understand such divergent clinical outcomes. Here we show analysis of coronavirus antibody responses of pre-pandemic healthy children (n = 89), adults (n = 98), elderly (n = 57), and COVID-19 patients (n = 50) by systems serology. Moderate levels of cross-reactive, but non-neutralizing, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are detected in pre-pandemic healthy individuals. SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific Fcγ receptor binding accurately distinguishes COVID-19 patients from healthy individuals, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces qualitative changes to antibody Fc, enhancing Fcγ receptor engagement. Higher cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG are observed in healthy elderly, while healthy children display elevated SARS-CoV-2 IgM, suggesting that children have fewer hCoV exposures, resulting in less-experienced but more polyreactive humoral immunity. Age-dependent analysis of COVID-19 patients, confirms elevated class-switched antibodies in elderly, while children have stronger Fc responses which we demonstrate are functionally different. These insights will inform COVID-19 vaccination strategies, improved serological diagnostics and therapeutics.

27 May 2020 in Nature Reviews Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PAPeter Aaby
Peter Aaby
CBChristine Stabell Benn
Christine Stabell Benn
Katie FlanaganKatie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
SKSabra L. Klein
Sabra L. Klein
TKTobias R. Kollmann
Tobias R. Kollmann
FSFrank Shann
Frank Shann

11 November 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STShidan Tosif
Shidan Tosif
MNMelanie Neeland
Melanie Neeland
PSPhil Sutton
Phil Sutton
Paul LicciardiPaul Licciardi
Paul Licciardi
SSSohinee Sarkar
Sohinee Sarkar
NCNigel W. Crawford
Nigel W. Crawford
Compared to adults, children with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have predominantly mild or asymptomatic infections, but the underlying immunological differences remain unclear. Here, we describe clinical features, virology, longitudinal cellular, and cytokine immune profile, SARS-CoV-2-specific serology and salivary antibody responses in a family of two parents with PCR-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and their three children, who tested repeatedly SARS-CoV-2 PCR negative. Cellular immune profiles and cytokine responses of all children are similar to their parents at all timepoints. All family members have salivary anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detected, predominantly IgA, that coincide with symptom resolution in 3 of 4 symptomatic members. Plasma from both parents and one child have IgG antibody against the S1 protein and virus-neutralizing activity detected. Using a systems serology approach, we demonstrate higher levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody features of these family members compared to healthy controls. These data indicate that children can mount an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 without virological confirmation of infection, raising the possibility that immunity in children can prevent the establishment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Relying on routine virological and serological testing may not identify exposed children, with implications for epidemiological and clinical studies across the life-span.

2 October 2020 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Katie FlanaganKatie Flanagan
Katie Flanagan
EBEmma Best
Emma Best
NCNigel W. Crawford
Nigel W. Crawford
MGMichelle Giles
Michelle Giles
AKArchana Koirala
Archana Koirala
SWSophie Ch Wen
Sophie Ch Wen
There are currently around 200 SARS-CoV-2 candidate vaccines in preclinical and clinical trials throughout the world. The various candidates employ a range of vaccine strategies including some novel approaches. Currently, the goal is to prove that they are safe and immunogenic in humans (phase 1/2 studies) with several now advancing into phase 2 and 3 trials to demonstrate efficacy and gather comprehensive data on safety. It is highly likely that many vaccines will be shown to stimulate antibody and T cell responses in healthy individuals and have an acceptable safety profile, but the key will be to confirm that they protect against COVID-19. There is much hope that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will be rolled out to the entire world to contain the pandemic and avert its most damaging impacts. However, in all likelihood this will initially require a targeted approach toward key vulnerable groups. Collaborative efforts are underway to ensure manufacturing can occur at the unprecedented scale and speed required to immunize billions of people. Ensuring deployment also occurs equitably across the globe will be critical. Careful evaluation and ongoing surveillance for safety will be required to address theoretical concerns regarding immune enhancement seen in previous contexts. Herein, we review the current knowledge about the immune response to this novel virus as it pertains to the design of effective and safe SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the range of novel and established approaches to vaccine development being taken. We provide details of some of the frontrunner vaccines and discuss potential issues including adverse effects, scale-up and delivery.