Sarah Edwards

Dr. Sarah Edwards

Children's Mercy Kansas City
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 March 2015 in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SESarah Edwards
Sarah Edwards
ADAnn M. Davis
Ann M. Davis
ABAmanda Bruce
Amanda Bruce
HMHayat Mousa
Hayat Mousa
BLBeth Lyman
Beth Lyman
PHPaul Hyman
Paul Hyman

19 October 2015 in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SESarah Edwards
Sarah Edwards
ADAnn McGrath Davis
Ann McGrath Davis
LELinda Ernst
Linda Ernst
BSBrenda Sitzmann
Brenda Sitzmann
ABAmanda Bruce
Amanda Bruce
PHPaul Hyman
Paul Hyman

11 February 2019 in BMC Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SESarah Edwards
Sarah Edwards
JCJose Cocjin
Jose Cocjin
STStephanie Bolger Theut
Stephanie Bolger Theut
DRDouglas Rivard
Douglas Rivard
ASAshley K. Sherman
Ashley K. Sherman
Craig A. FriesenCraig A. Friesen
Craig A. Friesen
In adults, there is a consensus for standards to diagnose gastroparesis utilizing a gastric emptying study as the key diagnostic modality but there is no consensus for a standard in pediatrics. Additionally, some cost savings might be achieved if symptoms could be utilized to predict patients with gastroparesis. The aims of the current study were to confirm the sensitivity of a 4 h study in the pediatric population and to assess whether the severity of symptoms were predictive of delayed gastric emptying. This was a single site, two part study. In the first part, results were reviewed for all patients who had completed a 4-h, solid gastric emptying study over the course of a 3 year period. In the second portion of the study, participants scheduled for a gastric emptying study, completed a modified GCSI questionnaire. Out of a total of 109 participants, at 2 h, 14 participants (12.8%) had abnormal studies as compared to 26 (23.85%) participants who had abnormal studies at 4 h (p = .0027). Of the 95 participants with normal studies at 2 h, 15% (14/95) were abnormal at 4 h. There were no differences in symptom severity scores between those with slow and those with normal emptying at either 2 h or 4 h. Our study adds independent confirmation that extending studies from 2 to 4 h increases the diagnostic yield and should be the standard in children and adolescents as it is in adults.

13 January 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SESarah Edwards
Sarah Edwards
LELinda Ernst
Linda Ernst
ASAshley K Sherman
Ashley K Sherman
ADAnn M Davis
Ann M Davis
Given the limited evidence available, the impact of nasogastric (NG) tube placement on swallowing in children is not well understood. When a child needs to be fed enterally, the current standard is to initially place an NG tube and leave it in place for the first few months of supplemental or total enteral nutrition. It is important to understand if placement of NG tubes has a negative effect on a patient’s swallow. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of those children who had videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) to identify all children who had an NG tube in place at the time of swallow study. Age and sex matched children were identified who had undergone VFSS without an NG in place. These charts were reviewed for diagnosis at the time of the VFSS and presence or absence of aspiration or laryngeal penetrations. Sixty-three children with NG tubes were identified, along with 63 age and sex matched children without NG tubes in place, at the time of VFSS. Ages ranged from 7 days to 13 years. The NG group had a significantly higher proportion demonstrating aspiration (46% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.0089). This study supports the need for further prospective evaluation of NG tubes and their effect on swallow, as well as more careful consideration of prolonged NG tube placement in patients with feeding problems. Consideration should be given to removal of the NG prior to VFSS to prevent the impact of NG placement on results of the swallow study which could lead to inappropriate modifications to the patient’s care plan.

30 April 2022 in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SESarah Edwards
Sarah Edwards
EGEarl F. Glynn
Earl F. Glynn
MSMichael Slogic
Michael Slogic
ADAnn Davis
Ann Davis
HKHaley J. Killian
Haley J. Killian
TAThomas M. Attard
Thomas M. Attard

15 September 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJensen Edwards
Jensen Edwards
Craig A. FriesenCraig A. Friesen
Craig A. Friesen
AIAmy Issa
Amy Issa
SESarah Edwards
Sarah Edwards
Currently, there are inconsistencies in the recommendations of when to obtain an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in children with feeding difficulties. The aim of our study was to identify EGD findings in patients presenting to a large, outpatient feeding program. Additionally, we investigated the presence of any relationship between abnormal pathology seen on biopsies (inflammation) and symptoms of feeding intolerance such as vomiting, gagging, retching, or abdominal pain. Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (EMRs) was conducted for all new patients aged 0–17 years presenting to the Multidisciplinary Feeding Clinic. Three hundred and thirty patients (50.2%) had an EGD with complete biopsies. Of these 330 patients, biopsies revealed esophagitis in 40%, gastritis in 33.6%, and duodenitis in 15.2%. Overall, 61.21% had an abnormal pathology in at least one site. We found that children with feeding disorders commonly have esophagitis, gastritis, and/or duodenitis and that symptoms are poor predictors of pathology. This study underscores the importance of gastrointestinal evaluation as part of a multidisciplinary evaluation in patients with feeding difficulties.