Kendell Clement

Dr. Kendell Clement

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 July 2018 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJason M Gehrke
Jason M Gehrke
OCOliver Cervantes
Oliver Cervantes
KCKendell Clement
Kendell Clement
YWYuxuan Wu
Yuxuan Wu
JZJing Zeng
Jing Zeng
JJJ Keith Joung
J Keith Joung

1 December 2014 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDan A. Landau
Dan A. Landau
KCKendell Clement
Kendell Clement
MZMichael J. Ziller
Michael J. Ziller
PBPatrick Boyle
Patrick Boyle
JFJean Fan
Jean Fan
CWCatherine J. Wu
Catherine J. Wu

18 November 2019 in Genome Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHuidong Chen
Huidong Chen
CLCaleb Lareau
Caleb Lareau
TATommaso Andreani
Tommaso Andreani
MVMichael E. Vinyard
Michael E. Vinyard
SGSara P. Garcia
Sara P. Garcia
LPLuca Pinello
Luca Pinello
Background: Recent innovations in single-cell Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) enable profiling of the epigenetic landscape of thousands of individual cells. scATAC-seq data analysis presents unique methodological challenges. scATAC-seq experiments sample DNA, which, due to low copy numbers (diploid in humans), lead to inherent data sparsity (1–10% of peaks detected per cell) compared to transcriptomic (scRNA-seq) data (10–45% of expressed genes detected per cell). Such challenges in data generation emphasize the need for informative features to assess cell heterogeneity at the chromatin level. Results: We present a benchmarking framework that is applied to 10 computational methods for scATAC-seq on 13 synthetic and real datasets from different assays, profiling cell types from diverse tissues and organisms. Methods for processing and featurizing scATAC-seq data were compared by their ability to discriminate cell types when combined with common unsupervised clustering approaches. We rank evaluated methods and discuss computational challenges associated with scATAC-seq analysis including inherently sparse data, determination of features, peak calling, the effects of sequencing coverage and noise, and clustering performance. Running times and memory requirements are also discussed. Conclusions: This reference summary of scATAC-seq methods offers recommendations for best practices with consideration for both the non-expert user and the methods developer. Despite variation across methods and datasets, SnapATAC, Cusanovich2018, and cisTopic outperform other methods in separating cell populations of different coverages and noise levels in both synthetic and real datasets. Notably, SnapATAC is the only method able to analyze a large dataset (> 80,000 cells).

16 March 2020 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JZJing Zeng
Jing Zeng
YWYuxuan Wu
Yuxuan Wu
CRChunyan Ren
Chunyan Ren
JBJasmine Bonanno
Jasmine Bonanno
ASAnne H. Shen
Anne H. Shen
DBDaniel E. Bauer
Daniel E. Bauer

26 July 2017 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJiho Choi
Jiho Choi
AHAaron J. Huebner
Aaron J. Huebner
KCKendell Clement
Kendell Clement
RWRyan M. Walsh
Ryan M. Walsh
ASAndrej Savol
Andrej Savol
KHKonrad Hochedlinger
Konrad Hochedlinger

3 October 2012 in Genome Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPatrick Boyle
Patrick Boyle
KCKendell Clement
Kendell Clement
HGHongcang Gu
Hongcang Gu
ZSZachary D Smith
Zachary D Smith
MZMichael Ziller
Michael Ziller
AMAlexander Meissner
Alexander Meissner
Sequencing-based approaches have led to new insights about DNA methylation. While many different techniques for genome-scale mapping of DNA methylation have been employed, throughput has been a key limitation for most. To further facilitate the mapping of DNA methylation, we describe a protocol for gel-free multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (mRRBS) that reduces the workload dramatically and enables processing of 96 or more samples per week. mRRBS achieves similar CpG coverage to the original RRBS protocol, while the higher throughput and lower cost make it better suited for large-scale DNA methylation mapping studies, including cohorts of cancer samples.