Zhaokun Wang

Dr. Zhaokun Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FZFuwang Zhao
Fuwang Zhao
Muhammad Nafees Mumtaz QadriMuhammad Nafees Mumtaz Qadri
Muhammad Nafees Mumtaz Qadri
ZWZhaokun Wang
Zhaokun Wang
Hui TangHui Tang
Hui Tang


5 September 2022 in International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QJQian Jiang
Qian Jiang
FRFeng Ren
Feng Ren
CWChenglei Wang
Chenglei Wang
ZWZhaokun Wang
Zhaokun Wang
GKGholamreza Kefayati
Gholamreza Kefayati
Hui TangHui Tang
Hui Tang

4 May 2023 in International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZWZhaokun Wang
Zhaokun Wang
FZFuwang ZHAO
Fuwang ZHAO
YFYu Fu
Yu Fu
FDFang Deng
Fang Deng
LZLingwei Zeng
Lingwei Zeng
JCJingyu Cui
Jingyu Cui

1 August 2023 in Physics of Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FZFuwang ZHAO
Fuwang ZHAO
ZWZhaokun Wang
Zhaokun Wang
Muhammad Nafees Mumtaz QadriMuhammad Nafees Mumtaz Qadri
Muhammad Nafees Mumtaz Qadri
OKOmer Khan
Omer Khan
AMAdnan Munir
Adnan Munir
Hui TangHui Tang
Hui Tang
A numerical investigation was carried out to analyze the interactions between semi-active tandem flapping foils at various tandem distances with a chord-based Reynolds number of 1100. Results indicate that with a tandem distance of less than 1.5 chord lengths and released in-phase, both foils exhibited terminal periodic motions with a nonzero mean stagger distance. In contrast, under the other conditions, the two foils ended up with periodic flapping motions without stagger. Due to the high-pressure region near the leading edge of the aft foil, the heaving motion of the fore foil resulted in lower energy extraction performance than that of single foil, when the tandem distance was less than 5 chord lengths. However, as the tandem distance increased, the fore foil acted like a single foil. The aft foil demonstrated significant fluctuations in performance parameters when subjected to the wake of the fore foil. The favorable interaction between the wake and aft foil resulted in lower power consumption for pitching and enabled the aft foil to extract an additional 15.2% power compared to a single foil. Conversely, during the unfavorable wake–foil interaction, the pitching motion of the aft foil consumed more energy than energy extraction from the heaving motion, leading to net energy consumption. The initial inter-foil pitching phase difference also significantly influenced the performance of the aft foil. Two models, the global phase and the wake phase model, affect these tandem configurations, both proving effective in capturing these effects with the wake phase model displaying notable efficacy.