Feinan LYU

Mr. Feinan LYU

China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLFeinan LYU
Feinan LYU
LZLI ZHANG
LI ZHANG

9 October 2023 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CGCheng Gong
Cheng Gong
FLFeinan LYU
Feinan LYU
YWYilei Wang
Yilei Wang

27 June 2024 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLFeinan LYU
Feinan LYU
JTJinqi Tang
Jinqi Tang
AOAruhan Olhnuud
Aruhan Olhnuud
FHFan Hao
Fan Hao
CGCheng Gong
Cheng Gong

11 December 2019 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCe Liu
Ce Liu
JTJin-Long Tian
Jin-Long Tian
TATong An
Tong An
FLFeinan LYU
Feinan LYU
PJPengfei Jia
Pengfei Jia
YFYu-Long Feng
Yu-Long Feng

31 December 2024 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLFeinan LYU
Feinan LYU
JWJunxi Wu
Junxi Wu
ZYZhenrong Yu
Zhenrong Yu
CGCheng Gong
Cheng Gong
HDHong J. Di
Hong J. Di
YPYing Pan
Ying Pan

2 November 2023 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFeinan LYU
Feinan LYU
YPYing Pan
Ying Pan
LYlinjun yu
linjun yu
XWXiang Wang
Xiang Wang
ZYZhenrong Yu
Zhenrong Yu
The agro-pastoral ecotone serves as an important ecological transition zone between grassland and cropland. It plays a crucial role in providing forage and maintaining the ecological security of Northern China. China has initiated many ecological restoration projects in the agro-pastoral ecotone. Separating the affecting factors of anthropogenic activities and natural factors change on grassland may help guide future ecological restoration projects. This study investigated the grassland change over the agro-pastoral ecotone in Inner Mongolia (APEI) using land use data, vegetation index, and monthly climate data, social and economic data from 2010 to 2020. Two indicators were introduced to evaluate the grassland change in quality and quantity. The average annual maximum NDVI of grassland within each sample was used as a proxy for grassland quality, and the proportion of grassland within each sample was used as a proxy for grassland quantity. The driving mechanisms of grassland quality were examined on different types of grassland. The results showed that (1) from 2010 to 2020, the quantity of grassland in APEI slightly decreased while the quality of the grassland significantly improved; (2) the change in grassland quality was jointly caused by natural factors and human activities, with 66.77% being attributed to natural factors and 33.23% to human activities. In some areas, the alteration in grassland quality was solely determined by either the impacts of natural factors or human-induced disturbances; and (3) temperature and precipitation played different roles in affecting grassland quality among different types of grassland. In some areas, anthropogenic activities, such as farmland and population, would affect grassland quality. The findings of this study would contribute to the understanding of the mechanism of ecological environmental changes in the agro-pastoral ecotone and guide the planning and implementation of future ecological restoration projects in agro-pastoral areas.