Likai Zhu

Dr. Likai Zhu

College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2021 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSong Jiang
Song Jiang
JMJijun Meng
Jijun Meng
Likai ZhuLikai Zhu
Likai Zhu
HCHaoran Cheng
Haoran Cheng

1 September 2020 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSong Jiang
Song Jiang
JMJijun Meng
Jijun Meng
Likai ZhuLikai Zhu
Likai Zhu

7 October 2019 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Likai ZhuLikai Zhu
Likai Zhu
AIAnthony R. Ives
Anthony R. Ives
CZChi Zhang
Chi Zhang
YGYuanyuan Guo
Yuanyuan Guo
VRVolker C. Radeloff
Volker C. Radeloff

27 October 2023 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYi Zou
Yi Zou
JMJijun Meng
Jijun Meng
Likai ZhuLikai Zhu
Likai Zhu
ZHZiyan Han
Ziyan Han
YMYuxiang Ma
Yuxiang Ma

9 December 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Likai ZhuLikai Zhu
Likai Zhu
YGYuanyuan Guo
Yuanyuan Guo
Chi ZhangChi Zhang
Chi Zhang
JMJijun Meng
Jijun Meng
LJLei Ju
Lei Ju
WTWenxue Tang
Wenxue Tang
With rapid urbanization, retrieving livability information of human settlements in time is essential for urban planning and governance. However, livability assessments are often limited by data availability and data update cycle, and this problem is more serious when making an assessment at finer spatial scales (e.g., community level). Here we aim to develop a reliable and dynamic model for community-level livability assessment taking Linyi city in Shandong Province, China as a case study. First, we constructed a hierarchical index system for livability assessment, and derived data for each index and community from remotely sensed data or Internet-based geospatial data. Next, we calculated the livability scores for all communities and assessed their uncertainties using Monte Carlo simulations. The results showed that the mean livability score of all communities was 59. The old urban and newly developed districts of our study area had the best livability, and got a livability score of 62 and 58 respectively, while industrial districts had the poorest conditions with an average livability score of 48. Results by dimension showed that the old urban district had better conditions of living amenity and travel convenience, but poorer conditions of environmental health and comfort. The newly developed districts were the opposite. We conclude that our model is effective and extendible for rapidly assessing community-level livability, which provides detailed and useful information of human settlements for sustainable urban planning and governance.

7 December 2014 in International Journal of Biometeorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Likai ZhuLikai Zhu
Likai Zhu
JMJijun Meng
Jijun Meng