AYSE MERVE ACILAR

Dr. AYSE MERVE ACILAR

Computer Eng. Dept., Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
orcid
Necmettin Erbakan University, Comp. Eng. Dept. and TRAUM

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 November 2019 in Progress in Orthodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHatice Kök
Hatice Kök
AAAYSE MERVE ACILAR
AYSE MERVE ACILAR
MIMehmet Said İzGi
Mehmet Said İzGi
Background: Growth and development can be determined by cervical vertebrae stages that were defined on the cephalometric radiograph. Artificial intelligence has the ability to perform a variety of activities, such as prediction-classification in many areas of life, by using different algorithms, In this study, we aimed to determine cervical vertebrae stages (CVS) for growth and development periods by the frequently used seven artificial intelligence classifiers, and to compare the performance of these algorithms with each other. Methods: Cephalometric radiographs, that were obtained from 300 individuals aged between 8 and 17 years were included in our study. Nineteen reference points were defined on second, third, and 4th cervical vertebrae, and 20 different linear measurements were taken. Seven algorithms of artificial intelligence that are frequently used in the field of classification were selected and compared. These algorithms are k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), Naive Bayes (NB), decision tree (Tree), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (Log.Regr.) algorithms. Results: According to confusion matrices decision tree, CSV1 (97.1%)–CSV2 (90.5%), SVM: CVS3 (73.2%)–CVS4 (58.5%), and kNN: CVS 5 (60.9%)–CVS 6 (78.7%) were the algorithms with the highest accuracy in determining cervical vertebrae stages. The ANN algorithm was observed to have the second-highest accuracy values (93%, 89.7%, 68.8%, 55.6%, and 78%, respectively) in determining all stages except CVS5 (47.4% third highest accuracy value). According to the average rank of the algorithms in predicting the CSV classes, ANN was the most stable algorithm with its 2.17 average rank. Conclusion: In our experimental study, kNN and Log.Regr. algorithms had the lowest accuracy values. SVM-RF-Tree and NB algorithms had varying accuracy values. ANN could be the preferred method for determining CVS.

1 May 2009 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAYSE MERVE ACILAR
AYSE MERVE ACILAR
AAAhmet Arslan
Ahmet Arslan

24 November 2020 in Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HKHatice Kök
Hatice Kök
MIMehmet Said İzgi
Mehmet Said İzgi
AAAYSE MERVE ACILAR
AYSE MERVE ACILAR

11 March 2021 in Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHatice Kök
Hatice Kök
MIMehmet Said Izgi
Mehmet Said Izgi
AAAYSE MERVE ACILAR
AYSE MERVE ACILAR
Artificial intelligence,bone age measurement,cephalometry,cervical vertebrae

1 March 2011 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAYSE MERVE ACILAR
AYSE MERVE ACILAR
AAAhmet Arslan
Ahmet Arslan

16 January 2024 in Journal of Energy Storage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DÖDilek Nur Özen
Dilek Nur Özen
EGEsra Hançer Güleryüz
Esra Hançer Güleryüz
AAAYSE MERVE ACILAR
AYSE MERVE ACILAR