Maggi Kelly

Prof. Maggi Kelly

UC Berkeley, UC ANR
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Thomas BlaschkeThomas Blaschke
Thomas Blaschke
GHGeoffrey J. Hay
Geoffrey J. Hay
Maggi KellyMaggi Kelly
Maggi Kelly
SLStefan Lang
Stefan Lang
PHPeter Hofmann
Peter Hofmann
Dirk TiedeDirk Tiede
Dirk Tiede
The amount of scientific literature on (Geographic) Object-based Image Analysis – GEOBIA has been and still is sharply increasing. These approaches to analysing imagery have antecedents in earlier research on image segmentation and use GIS-like spatial analysis within classification and feature extraction approaches. This article investigates these development and its implications and asks whether or not this is a new paradigm in remote sensing and Geographic Information Science (GIScience). We first discuss several limitations of prevailing per-pixel methods when applied to high resolution images. Then we explore the paradigm concept developed by Kuhn (1962) and discuss whether GEOBIA can be regarded as a paradigm according to this definition. We crystallize core concepts of GEOBIA, including the role of objects, of ontologies and the multiplicity of scales and we discuss how these conceptual developments support important methods in remote sensing such as change detection and accuracy assessment. The ramifications of the different theoretical foundations between the ‘per-pixel paradigm’ and GEOBIA are analysed, as are some of the challenges along this path from pixels, to objects, to geo-intelligence. Based on several paradigm indications as defined by Kuhn and based on an analysis of peer-reviewed scientific literature we conclude that GEOBIA is a new and evolving paradigm.

1 February 2005 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QGQinghua Guo
Qinghua Guo
Maggi KellyMaggi Kelly
Maggi Kelly
CGCatherine H. Graham
Catherine H. Graham

4 November 2008 in Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBrandon M. Collins
Brandon M. Collins
JMJay D. Miller
Jay D. Miller
ATAndrea E. Thode
Andrea E. Thode
Maggi KellyMaggi Kelly
Maggi Kelly
JWJan W. van Wagtendonk
Jan W. van Wagtendonk
SSScott L. Stephens
Scott L. Stephens

19 October 2006 in Landscape Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBrandon M. Collins
Brandon M. Collins
Maggi KellyMaggi Kelly
Maggi Kelly
JWJan W. van Wagtendonk
Jan W. van Wagtendonk
SSScott L. Stephens
Scott L. Stephens

26 August 2013 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarek K. Jakubowski
Marek K. Jakubowski
WLWenkai Li
Wenkai Li
QGQinghua Guo
Qinghua Guo
Maggi KellyMaggi Kelly
Maggi Kelly
Light detection and ranging (lidar) data is increasingly being used for ecosystem monitoring across geographic scales. This work concentrates on delineating individual trees in topographically-complex, mixed conifer forest across the California’s Sierra Nevada. We delineated individual trees using vector data and a 3D lidar point cloud segmentation algorithm, and using raster data with an object-based image analysis (OBIA) of a canopy height model (CHM). The two approaches are compared to each other and to ground reference data. We used high density (9 pulses/m2), discreet lidar data and WorldView-2 imagery to delineate individual trees, and to classify them by species or species types. We also identified a new method to correct artifacts in a high-resolution CHM. Our main focus was to determine the difference between the two types of approaches and to identify the one that produces more realistic results. We compared the delineations via tree detection, tree heights, and the shape of the generated polygons. The tree height agreement was high between the two approaches and the ground data (r2: 0.93–0.96). Tree detection rates increased for more dominant trees (8–100 percent). The two approaches delineated tree boundaries that differed in shape: the lidar-approach produced fewer, more complex, and larger polygons that more closely resembled real forest structure.

20 November 2018 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ovidiu CsillikOvidiu Csillik
Ovidiu Csillik
JCJohn Cherbini
John Cherbini
RJRobert Johnson
Robert Johnson
ALAndy Lyons
Andy Lyons
Maggi KellyMaggi Kelly
Maggi Kelly
Remote sensing is important to precision agriculture and the spatial resolution provided by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is revolutionizing precision agriculture workflows for measurement crop condition and yields over the growing season, for identifying and monitoring weeds and other applications. Monitoring of individual trees for growth, fruit production and pest and disease occurrence remains a high research priority and the delineation of each tree using automated means as an alternative to manual delineation would be useful for long-term farm management. In this paper, we detected citrus and other crop trees from UAV images using a simple convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm, followed by a classification refinement using superpixels derived from a Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) algorithm. The workflow performed well in a relatively complex agricultural environment (multiple targets, multiple size trees and ages, etc.) achieving high accuracy (overall accuracy = 96.24%, Precision (positive predictive value) = 94.59%, Recall (sensitivity) = 97.94%). To our knowledge, this is the first time a CNN has been used with UAV multi-spectral imagery to focus on citrus trees. More of these individual cases are needed to develop standard automated workflows to help agricultural managers better incorporate large volumes of high resolution UAV imagery into agricultural management operations.