Mara Lastretti

Prof. Mara Lastretti

orcid
Department of Economic, Psychological and Communication Scie...

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGavino Faa
Gavino Faa
CMCarlotta Meloni
Carlotta Meloni
Mara LastrettiMara Lastretti
Mara Lastretti
MPMartina Pinna
Martina Pinna
Mirko ManchiaMirko Manchia
Mirko Manchia
PPPasquale Paribello
Pasquale Paribello
Zinc (Zn2+) is a trace element essential for its catalytic, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory roles extending to synaptic signalling in the central nervous system. In this narrative review, we aim to offer the reader evidence linking perturbations of the Zn2+ homeostasis, including deficiency, excess, or transportation anomalies, to neuropsychiatric conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia (SCZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BD). A targeted, unsystematic PubMed search followed by an extensive pearl-growing strategy was applied to further augment study selection based on the extensive expertise of study authors. Overall, most of the evidence currently available suggests a modest benefit for a Zn2+ supplement of around 25–30 mg/day as an augmentation to MDD treatment, with potential benefits of smaller magnitude in paediatric ADHD. Evidence for perturbations of Zn2+ as a biomarker of risk for these neuropsychiatric disorders remains unconvincing. The role of Zn2+ supplements in the treatment of the selected conditions remains largely unknown due to the lack of specific, randomised controlled trials conducted to explore their efficacy. The long-term safety, optimal doses for specific applications, and the exploration of possible biomarkers to stratify patient selection to identify the optimal candidate for Zn2+ supplements remain unanswered questions.

16 October 2025 in Sexes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGiuseppe Seminara
Giuseppe Seminara
MAMarco Alessi
Marco Alessi
MZMaria Carmela Zagari
Maria Carmela Zagari
FGFrancesca Greco
Francesca Greco
ARAntonino Raffa
Antonino Raffa
CMCristiano Monarca
Cristiano Monarca
Gender dysphoria stems from incongruence between gender identity and assigned sex, often causing significant distress related to breast anatomy in transmasculine individuals. Gender-affirming hormone therapy typically precedes mastectomy, which is a fundamental intervention in transgender healthcare. Surgical challenges arise in patients with large breasts on lean frames, requiring customized techniques to achieve a natural, proportional, androgynous chest. This case report describes a 23-year-old transmasculine patient with macromastia and a tall, lean build who underwent gender-affirming mastectomy with free nipple grafts and muscular sculpture aimed at an androgynous esthetic. Pre- and postoperative evaluations showed marked improvements in body image, physical strength performance, and emotional well-being. Psychological assessments revealed significant reductions in body uneasiness and gender dysphoria, while human figure drawings demonstrated increasing bodily integration and identity congruence. A general improvement in physical performance over time was reported, particularly in upper body strength, with minor fluctuations potentially related to the surgical intervention and recovery phase. The narrative literature review supports these outcomes, highlighting satisfaction rates above 90%, minimal regret, and consistent gains in psychosocial functioning and sexual and mental health, including reduced anxiety and depression. This evidence reinforces that gender-affirming mastectomy is medically necessary, particularly when tailored to individual anatomical and esthetic needs, affirming identity and alleviating distress.

3 January 2026 in Lipidology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mara LastrettiMara Lastretti
Mara Lastretti
LCLorenzo Campedelli
Lorenzo Campedelli
TSTiziano Scarparo
Tiziano Scarparo
SSSabina Spagna
Sabina Spagna
ACAndrea Cicoli
Andrea Cicoli
Ettore D'AleoEttore D'Aleo
Ettore D'Aleo
Background: In recent decades, interest has grown in the link between lipid metabolism and mental health. Omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) play a crucial role in brain function, neuroplasticity, and emotional regulation. Deficiency or an imbalanced omega-6/omega-3 ratio, typical of Western diets, has been associated with an increased risk of mood disorders, such as major depression and bipolar disorder. Objective: This review critically synthesizes neurobiological and clinical evidence on the role of omega-3s in mood disorders, assessing mechanisms, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses, with a focus on inflammatory biomarkers and their integration into a personalized psychiatry framework. Methods: A narrative review of epidemiological studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and experimental research was conducted, evaluating mechanistic pathways (synaptic, inflammatory, neuroplastic, and redox) and clinical moderators (particularly inflammatory markers and dietary lipid profiles). Results: Consistent evidence indicates that EPA-enriched formulations (≥60%) exert antidepressant effects, particularly in patients with elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, TNF-α). In contrast, DHA-only preparations show limited efficacy, and outcomes vary depending on dietary omega-6/omega-3 balance. However, the literature remains heterogeneous in design, sample size, and biomarker stratification, which limits generalizability and contributes to conflicting findings across studies. Conclusions: While omega-3 fatty acids represent promising adjunctive interventions for mood disorders, methodological weaknesses and inconsistent formulations hinder definitive conclusions. Future research should prioritize biomarker-guided, precision-based approaches to clarify therapeutic efficacy and optimize clinical use.

28 November 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mara LastrettiMara Lastretti
Mara Lastretti
Manuela TomaiManuela Tomai
Manuela Tomai
NVNatalia Visalli
Natalia Visalli
FCFrancesco Chiaramonte
Francesco Chiaramonte
RTRenata Tambelli
Renata Tambelli
MLMarco Lauriola
Marco Lauriola
The economic burden of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a challenge for sustainability. Psychological factors, healthy behaviors, and stressful conditions are predictive and prognostic factors for T2DM. Focusing on psychological factors can reduce costs and help ensure the sustainability of diabetes care. The study aimed to support an integrated medical-psychological approach in the care of patients with T2DM. A group of patients undergoing usual healthcare treatment was compared to patients who received a psychotherapeutic intervention in addition to standard treatment. The study’s outcomes were: physical health (blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, blood lipids, blood pressure); lifestyle (cigarettes, alcoholic drinks, physical activity, body mass index); mental health (anxiety, depression, stress, coping styles, alexithymia, emotion regulation, locus of control); costs (number of referrals to a specialist, standard cost of each visit). We examined the change from baseline to 24-week follow-up. Compared to the Standard Group, the Integrated Group reported a reduction in blood lipids and triglycerides, chronic depressive and anxious mood states, patient emotional coping, and the number of specialist visits and diagnostic tests. Close collaboration between diabetologists and psychologists is feasible, and it is worth considering integrated care as an option to contain and make healthcare spending more sustainable.

LCLorenzo Campedelli
Lorenzo Campedelli
ACAndrea Cicoli
Andrea Cicoli
Mara LastrettiMara Lastretti
Mara Lastretti
SSSabina Spagna
Sabina Spagna
PTPaolo Tordiglione
Paolo Tordiglione
ACAlberto Costa
Alberto Costa
Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects approximately 280 million people worldwide, yet conventional pharmacotherapy achieves remission in only 30–50% of patients, intensifying the search for novel biological substrates. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines across six electronic databases (2014–March 2025), synthesised 89 studies examining gut microbiota composition in adults with MDD compared to healthy controls. MDD was consistently associated with reduced alpha diversity and a recurrent dysbiotic pattern, herein proposed as a depressive dysbiosis signature, characterised by depletion of butyrate-producing genera (Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Eubacterium, Coprococcus) and enrichment of pro-inflammatory taxa (Alistipes, Eggerthella, Streptococcus). While this pattern was observed across multiple cohorts, significant inter-study heterogeneity precludes its definition as a universal microbial signature for MDD. Beta diversity analyses demonstrated robust compositional separation between cohorts. Plausible mechanistic pathways included compromised short-chain fatty acid production, increased intestinal permeability, low-grade systemic inflammation, tryptophan shunting toward the kynurenine pathway, and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysregulation. Preclinical faecal microbiota transplantation provided translational evidence consistent with a causal interpretation, while randomised probiotic trials demonstrated significant reductions in depressive symptom severity compared with placebo. Probiotic effects are strain-specific according to ISAPP consensus; generalisation across strains is not warranted. Gut microbiota dysbiosis represents a biologically plausible mediator of depression pathophysiology, with a recurrent dysbiotic pattern, characterised by depletion of butyrate-producing taxa and enrichment of pro-inflammatory genera, showing emerging diagnostic and therapeutic potential.

2 September 2026 in Psychiatry International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mara LastrettiMara Lastretti
Mara Lastretti
Mirko ManchiaMirko Manchia
Mirko Manchia
Matteo FraschiniMatteo Fraschini
Matteo Fraschini
AFAndrea Faa
Andrea Faa
FCFerdinando Coghe
Ferdinando Coghe
GFGavino Faa
Gavino Faa
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven conversational systems are increasingly capable of simulating empathy, adapting to individual users, and fostering emotional bonds that blur the boundary between tool and companion. This scoping review maps the extent and nature of published evidence regarding psychological mechanisms underlying emotional reliance on AI chatbots and associated mental health implications. Methods: Conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore from database inception to March 2026. Two independent reviewers screened records and extracted data using the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework. Thematic synthesis was performed to map evidence across psychological, clinical, and developmental domains. Results: Of 1847 records identified, 46 studies met inclusion criteria. Key themes included: (1) the ELIZA effect as a foundational mechanism of human–AI attachment, with documented cases of severe dependency including fatal outcomes; (2) anthropomorphization and artificial intimacy fostered by adaptive, personalized AI design; (3) proposal of Generative AI Dependency (GAID) as a conceptual framework mapping onto behavioral addiction components, pending empirical validation; (4) particular vulnerability of adolescents and lonely individuals to exclusive affective bonds with AI; and (5) potential erosion of human relational capacities, empathy development, and tolerance for interpersonal complexity. Significant gaps were identified in longitudinal research, validated screening tools, and intervention protocols. Conclusions: Emotional reliance on AI represents an emerging clinical phenomenon with addiction-like features requiring specific diagnostic frameworks, evidence-based interventions, and ethical design guidelines. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies examining developmental impacts and neurobiological investigations of AI-mediated reinforcement mechanisms.