Introduction: A range of behavioral testing paradigms have been developed for the research of central and peripheral nerve injuries with the help of small animal models. Following any nerve repair strategy, improved functional outcome may be the most important evidence of axon regeneration. A novel automated gait analysis system, the CatWalk^™, can measure dynamic as well as static gait patterns of small animals. Of most interest in detecting functional recovery are in particular dynamic gait parameters, coordination measures, and the intensity of the animals paw prints. This article is designed to lead to a more efficient choice of CatWalk parameters in future studies concerning the functional evaluation of nerve regeneration and simultaneously add to better interstudy comparability.Methods: The aims of the present paper are threefold: (1) to describe the functional method of CatWalk gait analysis, (2) to characterize different parameters acquired by CatWalk gait analysis, and to find the most frequently used parameters as well as (3) to compare their reliability and validity throughout the different studies.Results: In the reviewed articles, the most frequently used parameters were Swing Duration (30), Print Size (27), Stride Length (26), and Max Contact Area (24). Swing Duration was not only frequently used but was also the most reliable and valid parameter. Therefore, we hypothesize that Swing Duration constitutes an important parameter to be chosen for future studies, as it has the highest level of reliability and validity.Conclusion: In conclusion, CatWalk can be used as a complementary approach to other behavioral testing paradigms to assess clinically relevant behavioral benefits, with the main advantage that this system demonstrates both static and dynamic gait parameters at the same time. Due to limited reliability and validity of certain parameters, we recommend that only the most frequently assessed parameters should be used in the future.

The EORTC-Lung Cancer Group initiated a Delphi consensus process to establish a consensual definition of resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for the use in clinical trials, including a systematic review, survey, and review of clinical cases. Here, the survey results are presented, aimed to identify areas of controversy. A survey was distributed among the members of six international organizations related to lung cancer. Respondents were interrogated on the resectability (not limited to the technical resectability) of all stage III NSCLC TNM-subsets (8th edition). Additionally, four N2-subdivisions were used. The threshold for agreement was 75%. Answers with "yes" were considered upfront resectable. "Yes" and "maybe" were grouped together and considered potentially resectable. Answers with "no" were considered unresectable. 558 responses were collected from thoracic surgeons (38%), radiation oncologists (27%), medical oncologists (17%), pulmonologists (14%), and others (4%). Most worked in a specialized center (80%), had >5 years of experience (80%), were European (76%), male (73%), and treated >20 patients with stage III NSCLC annually (77%). Agreement was found in 26 (70%) out of 37 TNM-subsets: 9 (24%) were considered (potentially) resectable, and 17 (46%) unresectable. There was no agreement for 11 (30%) TNM-subsets: smaller tumors with N2-multistation, larger tumors with N2-single station, and invasive T4-tumors with maximum N2-single station involvement. This international and multidisciplinary survey showed agreement on the resectability for the majority of stage III NSCLC TNM-subsets, but also identified several TNM-subsets for which no agreement was found.

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is the presence of air in the pleural space, occurring in the absence of trauma and known lung disease. Standardized expert guidelines on PSP are needed due to the variety of diagnostic methods, therapeutic strategies and medical and surgical disciplines involved in its management. Literature review, analysis of the literature according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology; proposals for guidelines rated by experts, patients and organizers to reach a consensus. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected. A large PSP is defined as presence of a visible rim along the entire axillary line between the lung margin and the chest wall and ≥ 2 cm at the hilum level on frontal chest X-ray. The therapeutic strategy depends on the clinical presentation: emergency needle aspiration for tension PSP; in the absence of signs of severity: conservative management (small PSP), needle aspiration or chest tube drainage (large PSP). Outpatient treatment is possible if a dedicated outpatient care system is previously organized. Indications, surgical procedures and perioperative analgesia are detailed. Associated measures, including smoking cessation, are described. These guidelines are a step towards PSP treatment and follow-up strategy optimization in France.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy in obese patients to determine the impact of the robotic approach on a high-risk population who were candidates for major pulmonary resection for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Between January 2007 and August 2018, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 224 obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30) who underwent pulmonary lobectomy at our institution via robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS, n = 51) or lateral muscle-sparing thoracotomy (n = 173). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were individually matched with those who had the same pathological tumour stage and similar comorbidities and presurgical treatment. The median operative time was significantly longer in the RATS group compared to that in the thoracotomy group (200 vs 158 min; P = 0.003), whereas the length of stay was significantly better for the RATS group (5 vs 6 days; P = 0.047). Postoperative complications were significantly more frequent after open lobectomy than in the RATS group (42.9% vs 16.7%; P = 0.027). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the 5-year overall survival rate was 67.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.7–82.2] for the RATS group, and 66.1% (95% CI 46.8–79.9) for the open surgery group (log-rank P = 0.54). The 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 24.8% (95% CI 9.7–43.5) for the RATS group and 23.6% (95% CI 10.8–39.2) for the open surgery group (Gray’s test, P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: RATS is feasible and safe for obese patients with NSCLC with advantages compared to open surgery in terms of early postoperative outcomes. In addition, the long-term survival rate was comparable to that of the open approach.