Markus Ries

Prof. Dr. Markus Ries

Crisis and Disaster Management Unit, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2004 in European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMA. Mehta
A. Mehta
RRR. Ricci
R. Ricci
UWU. Widmer
U. Widmer
FDF. Dehout
F. Dehout
ALA. Garcia de Lorenzo
A. Garcia de Lorenzo
MBM. Beck
M. Beck

16 February 2004 in Clinical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWC Whybra
C Whybra
CKC Kampmann
C Kampmann
FKF Krummenauer
F Krummenauer
Markus RiesMarkus Ries
Markus Ries
EME Mengel
E Mengel
MBM Beck
M Beck

1 December 2009 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMA Mehta
A Mehta
MBM Beck
M Beck
Perry ElliottPerry Elliott
Perry Elliott
RGR Giugliani
R Giugliani
ALAleš Linhart
Aleš Linhart
FIFabry Outcome Survey investigators
Fabry Outcome Survey investigators

4 October 2005 in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRaphael Schiffmann
Raphael Schiffmann
Markus RiesMarkus Ries
Markus Ries
MTMargaret Timmons
Margaret Timmons
JFJohn T. Flaherty
John T. Flaherty
RBRoscoe O. Brady
Roscoe O. Brady
Background. Fabry disease is an X-linked disorder of glycosphingolipid catabolism that is the result of an intracellular deficiency in the lysosomal enzyme α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A). This enzymatic defect results in the accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) within cells and causes progressive neurological, cardiovascular and renal dysfunction. Our objective is to describe the safety and renal effects of long-term enzyme replacement therapy. Methods. This was a single centre, prospective open-label treatment trial in 25 adult male Fabry patients who had completed a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled study and subsequently enrolled in an open-label extension study. Patients were treated every other week with agalsidase alfa (0.2 mg/kg) infused intravenously over 40 min. The main outcome measures were safety, antibody response and renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results. During the 4–4.5 years of enzyme replacement therapy, all eligible subjects were able to transition to home therapy. Eight patients developed persistent IgG antibodies to agalsidase alfa, but IgE antibodies were not detected in any patient. The development of IgG antibodies appeared not to affect any clinical end points. Estimated GFR remained stable in subgroups of patients with Stage I (GFR >90 ml/min) or Stage II (GFR 60–89 ml/min) chronic kidney disease at baseline. In contrast, in the subgroup of patients with Stage III chronic kidney disease (GFR 30–59 ml/min), the slope of the decline in GFR was reduced compared with comparable historical controls, suggesting that enzyme replacement therapy was slowing the decline of renal function in this susceptible population. Conclusions. Long-term enzyme replacement therapy with agalsidase alfa is safe and may slow the progressive decline in renal function that was commonly observed in adult males with Fabry disease.

1 November 2008 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRaphael Schiffmann
Raphael Schiffmann
EFEdmond J. FitzGibbon
Edmond J. FitzGibbon
CHChris Harris
Chris Harris
CDCatherine DeVile
Catherine DeVile
EDElin H. Davies
Elin H. Davies
AVAshok Vellodi
Ashok Vellodi
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of miglustat, concomitant with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), in patients with Gaucher's disease type 3 (GD3).Methods: This 24‐month, phase II, open‐label clinical trial of miglustat in GD3 was conducted in two phases. During the initial 12 months, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive miglustat or “no miglustat treatment.” The randomized phase was followed by an optional 12‐month extension phase in which all patients received miglustat. All patients received ERT during the 24‐month period. The primary efficacy end points were change from baseline to months 12 and 24 in vertical saccadic eye movement velocity as determined by the peak amplitude versus amplitude regression line slope. Secondary end points included changes in neurological and neuropsychological assessments, pulmonary function tests, liver and spleen organ volumes, hematological and clinical laboratory assessments, and safety evaluations.Results: Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 21 were randomized to miglustat and 9 to “no miglustat treatment.” Twenty‐eight patients entered the 12‐month extension phase. No significant between‐group differences in vertical saccadic eye movement velocity or in the other neurological or neuropsychological evaluations were observed. Organ volumes and hematological parameters remained stable in both treatment groups, but improvement in pulmonary function and decrease of chitotriosidase levels were observed with miglustat compared with patients receiving ERT alone.Interpretation: Miglustat does not appear to have significant benefits on the neurological manifestations of GD3. However, miglustat may have positive effects on systemic disease (pulmonary function and chitotriosidase activity) in addition to ERT in patients with GD3. Ann Neurol 2008;64:514–522

1 November 2003 in European Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Markus RiesMarkus Ries
Markus Ries
URUma Ramaswami
Uma Ramaswami
RPRossella Parini
Rossella Parini
BLBengt Lindblad
Bengt Lindblad
CWCatharina Whybra
Catharina Whybra
MBMichael Beck
Michael Beck