Autonomous vehicles (AVs) rely heavily on sensors to perceive their surrounding environment and then make decisions and act on them. However, these sensors have weaknesses, and are prone to failure, resulting in decision errors by vehicle controllers that pose significant challenges to their safe operation. To mitigate sensor failures, it is necessary to understand how they occur and how they affect the vehicle’s behavior so that fault-tolerant and fault-masking strategies can be applied. This survey covers 108 publications and presents an overview of the sensors used in AVs today, categorizes the sensor’s failures that can occur, such as radar interferences, ambiguities detection, or camera image failures, and provides an overview of mitigation strategies such as sensor fusion, redundancy, and sensor calibration. It also provides insights into research areas critical to improving safety in the autonomous vehicle industry, so that new or more in-depth research may emerge.

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are increasingly becoming a reality, enabled by advances in sensing technologies, intelligent control systems, and real-time data processing. For AVs to operate safely and effectively, they must maintain a reliable perception of their surroundings and internal state. However, sensor failures, whether due to noise, malfunction, or degradation, can compromise this perception and lead to incorrect localization or unsafe decisions by the autonomous control system. While modern AV systems often combine data from multiple sensors to mitigate such risks through sensor fusion techniques (e.g., Kalman filtering), the extent to which these systems remain resilient under faulty conditions remains an open question. This work presents a simulation-based fault injection framework to assess the impact of sensor failures on AVs’ behavior. The framework enables structured testing of autonomous driving software under controlled fault conditions, allowing researchers to observe how specific sensor failures affect system performance. To demonstrate its applicability, an experimental campaign was conducted using the CARLA simulator integrated with the Autoware autonomous driving stack. A multi-segment urban driving scenario was executed using a modified version of CARLA’s Scenario Runner to support Autoware-based evaluations. Faults were injected simulating LiDAR, GNSS, and IMU sensor failures in different route scenarios. The fault types considered in this study include silent sensor failures and severe noise. The results obtained by emulating sensor failures in our chosen system under test, Autoware, show that faults in LiDAR and IMU gyroscope have the most critical impact, often leading to erratic motion and collisions. In contrast, faults in GNSS and IMU accelerometers were well tolerated. This demonstrates the ability of the framework to investigate the fault-tolerance of AVs in the presence of critical sensor failures.