Matthew Wilson

Prof. Matthew Wilson

School of Earth and Environment, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2007 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNeil M. Hunter
Neil M. Hunter
PBPaul Bates
Paul Bates
MHMatthew S. Horritt
Matthew S. Horritt
Matthew WilsonMatthew Wilson
Matthew Wilson

1 September 2005 in Advances in Water Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNeil M. Hunter
Neil M. Hunter
MHMatthew S. Horritt
Matthew S. Horritt
PBPaul Bates
Paul Bates
Matthew WilsonMatthew Wilson
Matthew Wilson
MWMicha G.F. Werner
Micha G.F. Werner

17 October 2008 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Michael DurandMichael Durand
Michael Durand
KAKonstantinos M. Andreadis
Konstantinos M. Andreadis
DADouglas E. Alsdorf
Douglas E. Alsdorf
DLDennis P. Lettenmaier
Dennis P. Lettenmaier
DMDelwyn Moller
Delwyn Moller
Matthew WilsonMatthew Wilson
Matthew Wilson

7 August 2007 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matthew WilsonMatthew Wilson
Matthew Wilson
PBPaul Bates
Paul Bates
DADoug Alsdorf
Doug Alsdorf
BFbruce forsberg
bruce forsberg
MHMatthew Horritt
Matthew Horritt
JFJames Famiglietti
James Famiglietti
This paper presents the first application and validation of a 2D hydrodynamic model of the Amazon at a large spatial scale. The simulation results suggest that a significantly higher proportion of total flow is routed through the floodplain than previously thought. We use the hydrodynamic model LISFLOOD‐FP with topographic data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission to predict floodplain inundation for a 240 × 125 km section of the central Amazon floodplain in Brazil and compare our results to satellite‐derived estimates of inundation extent, existing gauged data and satellite altimetry. We find that model accuracy is good at high water (72% spatial fit; 0.99 m root mean square error in water stage heights), while accuracy drops at low water (23%; 3.17 m) due to incomplete drainage of the floodplain resulting from errors in topographic data and omission of floodplain hydrologic processes from this initial model.

1 April 2009 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJeffrey Neal
Jeffrey Neal
PBPaul Bates
Paul Bates
TFTimothy J. Fewtrell
Timothy J. Fewtrell
NHNeil M. Hunter
Neil M. Hunter
Matthew WilsonMatthew Wilson
Matthew Wilson
MHMatthew S. Horritt
Matthew S. Horritt

1 July 2009 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMark A Trigg
Mark A Trigg
Matthew WilsonMatthew Wilson
Matthew Wilson
PBPaul Bates
Paul Bates
MHMatthew S. Horritt
Matthew S. Horritt
DADouglas E. Alsdorf
Douglas E. Alsdorf
MVMaria C. Vega
Maria C. Vega