Objectives: Heart failure (HF) remains a significant public health issue, with heart transplantation (HT) being the gold standard treatment for end-stage HF. The increasing use of mechanical circulatory support, particularly left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), as a bridge to transplant (BTT), presents new perspectives for increasingly complex clinical scenarios. This study aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes in patients in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving an LVAD as BTT to those undergoing direct-to-transplant (DTT) without mechanical support, focusing on survival and post-transplant complications. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study included 105 patients who underwent HT from 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: BTT (n = 28) and DTT (n = 77). Primary endpoints included overall survival at 1 and 7 years post-HT. Secondary outcomes involved late complications, including organ rejection, renal failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and cerebrovascular events. Results: At HT, the use of LVADs results in longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times in the BTT group; nevertheless, surgical complexity does not affect 30-day mortality. Survival at 1 year was 89.3% for BTT and 85.7% for DTT (p = 0.745), while at 7 years, it was 80.8% and 77.1%, respectively (p = 0.840). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of major complications, including permanent dialysis, organ rejection, and CAV. However, a higher incidence of cerebrovascular events was noted in the BTT group (10.7% vs. 2.6%). Conclusions: LVAD use as BTT does not negatively impact early post-transplant survival compared to DTT. At long-term follow-up, clinical outcomes remained similar across groups, supporting LVADs as a viable option for bridging patients to transplant.

Background and Clinical Significance: Hemophilia A presents a considerable challenge in cardiac surgery due to the elevated risk of perioperative bleeding, particularly during procedures involving cardiopulmonary bypass. Standard management typically involves standard half-life (SHL) factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, which require frequent dosing. Extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products offer theoretical advantages, including prolonged action and reduced infusion frequency, but their use in cardiac surgery remains largely undocumented. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 73-year-old male with mild Hemophilia A who underwent successful aortic valve replacement using a 25 mm Carpentier-Edwards Magna Ease biological prosthesis. The patient was managed perioperatively with an anti-hemorrhagic protocol based on EHL recombinant FVIII. The surgery and postoperative course were uneventful, with no bleeding complications or need for transfusion. Conclusions: This case illustrates the potential role of EHL FVIII in safely managing hemophilic patients undergoing major cardiac surgery. Given the lack of existing reports in the literature, further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EHL FVIII in this setting and to potentially optimize perioperative care protocols for this patient population.