Rational: Cisplatin based cancer therapy is an affordable and effective standard therapy for several solid cancers, including lung, ovarian and head and neck cancers. However, the clinical use of cisplatin is routinely limited by the development of drug resistance and subsequent therapeutic failure. Therefore, methods of circumventing cisplatin resistance have the potential to increase therapeutic efficiency and dramatically increase overall survival. Cisplatin resistance can be mediated by alterations to the DNA damage response, where multiple components of the repair machinery have been described to be client proteins of HSP90. In the present study, we have investigated whether therapy with the novel HSP90 inhibitor onalespib can potentiate the efficacy of cisplatin and potentially reverse cisplatin resistance in ovarian and head and neck cancer cells. Methods: Cell viability, cancer cell proliferation and migration capacity were evaluated in vitro on models of ovarian and head and neck cancer cells. Western blotting was used to assess the downregulation of HSP90 client proteins and alterations in downstream signaling proteins after exposure to cisplatin and/or onalespib. Induction of apoptosis and DNA damage response were evaluated in both monotherapy and combination therapy groups. Results: Results demonstrate that onalespib enhances the efficiency of cisplatin in a dose-dependent manner. Tumor cells treated with both drugs displayed lower viability and a decreased migration rate compared to vehicle-control cells and cells treated with individual compounds. An increase of DNA double strand breaks was observed in both cisplatin and onalespib treated cells. The damage was highest and most persistent in the combination group, delaying the DNA repair machinery. Further, the cisplatin and onalespib co-treated cells had greater apoptotic activity compared to controls. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that the reduced therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin due to drug-resistance could be overcome by combination treatment with onalespib. We speculate that the increased apoptotic signaling, DNA damage as well as the downregulation of HSP90 client proteins are important mechanisms promoting increased sensitivity to cisplatin treatment.
• Ra-223 binding to bone-like structures is extreme without any uptake in cancer cells. • Clustered DNA double-strand break (DSB) were induced in prostate tumor cells. • These DSB activated non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair. • This triggered apoptosis and inhibited cell growth independent of cell type. • Ra-223 bound to bone-like structures increases the tumor cell-killing.
P53 is involved in DNA damage response and is an exciting target for radiosensitization in cancer. Targeted radionuclide therapy against somatostatin receptors with 177Lu-DOTATATE is currently being explored as a treatment for neuroblastoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the novel p53-stabilizing peptide VIP116 in neuroblastoma, both as monotherapy and together with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Five neuroblastoma cell lines, including two patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines, were characterized in monolayer cultures. Four out of five were positive for 177Lu-DOTATATE uptake. IC50 values after VIP116 treatments correlated with p53 status, ranging between 2.8–238.2 μM. IMR-32 and PDX lines LU-NB-1 and LU-NB-2 were then cultured as multicellular tumor spheroids and treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE and/or VIP116. Spheroid growth was inhibited in all spheroid models for all treatment modalities. The most pronounced effects were observed for combination treatments, mediating synergistic effects in the IMR-32 model. VIP116 and combination treatment increased p53 levels with subsequent induction of p21, Bax and cleaved caspase 3. Combination treatment resulted in a 14-fold and 1.6-fold induction of MDM2 in LU-NB-2 and IMR-32 spheroids, respectively. This, together with differential MYCN signaling, may explain the varying degree of synergy. In conclusion, VIP116 inhibited neuroblastoma cell growth, potentiated 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment and could, therefore, be a feasible treatment option for neuroblastoma.
1 March 2018 in Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology