Michele Flammini

Prof. Michele Flammini

Gran Sasso Science Institute - GSSI

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 July 2010 in Algorithmica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ICIoannis Caragiannis
Ioannis Caragiannis
Michele FlamminiMichele Flammini
Michele Flammini
CKChristos Kaklamanis
Christos Kaklamanis
PKPanagiotis Kanellopoulos
Panagiotis Kanellopoulos
LMLuca Moscardelli
Luca Moscardelli

1 January 2006
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ICIoannis Caragiannis
Ioannis Caragiannis
Michele FlamminiMichele Flammini
Michele Flammini
CKChristos Kaklamanis
Christos Kaklamanis
PKPanagiotis Kanellopoulos
Panagiotis Kanellopoulos
LMLuca Moscardelli
Luca Moscardelli

21 June 2018 in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VBVittorio Bilò
Vittorio Bilò
AFAngelo Fanelli
Angelo Fanelli
Michele FlamminiMichele Flammini
Michele Flammini
GMGianpiero Monaco
Gianpiero Monaco
LMLuca Moscardelli
Luca Moscardelli
We consider fractional hedonic games, a subclass of coalition formation games that can be succinctly modeled by means of a graph in which nodes represent agents and edge weights the degree of preference of the corresponding endpoints. The happiness or utility of an agent for being in a coalition is the average value she ascribes to its members. We adopt Nash stable outcomes as the target solution concept; that is we focus on states in which no agent can improve her utility by unilaterally changing her own group. We provide existence, efficiency and complexity results for games played on both general and specific graph topologies. As to the efficiency results, we mainly study the quality of the best Nash stable outcome and refer to the ratio between the social welfare of an optimal coalition structure and the one of such an equilibrium as to the price of stability. In this respect, we remark that a best Nash stable outcome has a natural meaning of stability, since it is the optimal solution among the ones which can be accepted by selfish agents. We provide upper and lower bounds on the price of stability for different topologies, both in case of weighted and unweighted edges. Beside the results for general graphs, we give refined bounds for various specific cases, such as triangle-free, bipartite graphs and tree graphs. For these families, we also show how to efficiently compute Nash stable outcomes with provable good social welfare.

1 January 2022 in Games and Economic Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VBVittorio Bilò
Vittorio Bilò
ICIoannis Caragiannis
Ioannis Caragiannis
Michele FlamminiMichele Flammini
Michele Flammini
AIAyumi Igarashi
Ayumi Igarashi
Gianpiero MonacoGianpiero Monaco
Gianpiero Monaco
WZWilliam S. Zwicker
William S. Zwicker

1 September 2010 in Theoretical Computer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michele FlamminiMichele Flammini
Michele Flammini
GMGianpiero Monaco
Gianpiero Monaco
LMLuca Moscardelli
Luca Moscardelli
HSHadas Shachnai
Hadas Shachnai
MSMordechai Shalom
Mordechai Shalom
SZShmuel Zaks
Shmuel Zaks

7 September 2010 in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michele FlamminiMichele Flammini
Michele Flammini
ASAlberto Spaccamela
Alberto Spaccamela
GMGianpiero Monaco
Gianpiero Monaco
LMLuca Moscardelli
Luca Moscardelli
SZShmuel Zaks
Shmuel Zaks
Placement of regenerators in optical networks has attracted the attention of recent research works in optical networks. In this problem, we are given a network with an underlying topology of a graph G and with a set of requests that correspond to paths in G. There is a need to put a regenerator every certain distance, because of a decrease in the power of the signal. In this paper, we investigate the problem of minimizing the number of locations to place the regenerators. We present analytical results regarding the complexity of this problem, in four cases, depending on whether or not there is a bound on the number of regenerators at each node, and depending on whether or not the routing is given or only the requests are given (and part of the solution is also to determine the actual routing). These results include polynomial time algorithms, NP-completeness results, approximation algorithms, and inapproximability results.