Mikko J Nissi

Dr. Mikko J Nissi

University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Pohjois-Savo, Finland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 June 2004 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJ.E. Kurkijärvi
J.E. Kurkijärvi
Mikko J NissiMikko J Nissi
Mikko J Nissi
IKI. Kiviranta
I. Kiviranta
JJJ.S. Jurvelin
J.S. Jurvelin
MNM.T. Nieminen
M.T. Nieminen
The macromolecular structure and mechanical properties of articular cartilage are interrelated and known to vary topographically in the human knee joint. To investigate the potential of delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T1, and T2 mapping to elucidate these differences, full‐thickness cartilage disks were prepared from six anatomical locations in nonarthritic human knee joints (N = 13). Young's modulus and the dynamic modulus at 1 Hz were determined with the use of unconfined compression tests, followed by quantitative MRI measurements at 9.4 Tesla. Mechanical tests revealed reproducible, statistically significant differences in moduli between the patella and the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Typically, femoral cartilage showed higher Young's (>1.0 MPa) and dynamic (>8 MPa) moduli than tibial or patellar cartilage (Young's modulus <0.9 MPa, dynamic modulus <8 MPa). dGEMRIC moderately reproduced the topographical variation in moduli. Additionally, T1, T2, and dGEMRIC revealed topographical differences that were not registered mechanically. The different MRI and mechanical parameters showed poor to excellent linear correlations, up to r = 0.87, at individual test sites. After all specimens were pooled, dGEMRIC was the best predictor of compressive stiffness (r = 0.57, N = 77). The results suggest that quantitative MRI can indirectly provide information on the mechanical properties of human knee articular cartilage, as well as the site‐dependent variations of these properties. Investigators should consider the topographical variation in MRI parameters when conducting quantitative MRI of cartilage in vivo. Magn Reson Med 52:41–46, 2004.

30 December 2005 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELE. Lammentausta
E. Lammentausta
PKP. Kiviranta
P. Kiviranta
Mikko J NissiMikko J Nissi
Mikko J Nissi
MLM.S. Laasanen
M.S. Laasanen
IKI. Kiviranta
I. Kiviranta
JJJ.S. Jurvelin
J.S. Jurvelin
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have been developed for noninvasive assessment of the structure of articular cartilage. T2 relaxation time is sensitive to the integrity and orientation of the collagen network, while T1 relaxation time in presence of Gd‐DTPA2− (dGEMRIC) reflects the proteoglycan content of cartilage. In the present study, human patellar cartilage samples were investigated in vitro to determine the ability of MRI parameters to reveal topographical variations and to predict mechanical properties of cartilage at two different field strengths. T2 and dGEMRIC measurements at 1.5 T and 9.4 T were correlated with the static and dynamic compressive moduli at six anatomical locations of the patellar surface. Statistically significant linear correlations were observed between MRI and mechanical parameters at both field strengths, especially between T2 and Young's modulus. No significant difference was found between the T2 measurements at different field strengths in predicting mechanical properties of the tissue. Topographical variation of T2 values at both field strengths was similar to that of Young's moduli. The current results demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative MRI, particularly T2 mapping, to reflect the mechanical properties of human patellar cartilage at both field strengths. © 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 24:366–374, 2006

1 December 2006 in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mikko J NissiMikko J Nissi
Mikko J Nissi
JRJ. Rieppo
J. Rieppo
JTJ. Töyräs
J. Töyräs
MLM.S. Laasanen
M.S. Laasanen
IKI. Kiviranta
I. Kiviranta
MNM.T. Nieminen
M.T. Nieminen

1 October 2007 in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mikko J NissiMikko J Nissi
Mikko J Nissi
JRJ. Rieppo
J. Rieppo
JTJ. Töyräs
J. Töyräs
MLM.S. Laasanen
M.S. Laasanen
IKI. Kiviranta
I. Kiviranta
JJJ.S. Jurvelin
J.S. Jurvelin

29 August 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNina Hänninen
Nina Hänninen
JRJari Rautiainen
Jari Rautiainen
LRLassi Rieppo
Lassi Rieppo
SSSimo Saarakkala
Simo Saarakkala
Mikko J NissiMikko J Nissi
Mikko J Nissi
In highly organized tissues, such as cartilage, tendons and white matter, several quantitative MRI parameters exhibit dependence on the orientation of the tissue constituents with respect to the main imaging magnetic field (B0). In this study, we investigated the dependence of multiple relaxation parameters on the orientation of articular cartilage specimens in the B0. Bovine patellar cartilage-bone samples (n = 4) were investigated ex vivo at 9.4 Tesla at seven different orientations, and the MRI results were compared with polarized light microscopy findings on specimen structure. Dependences of T2 and continuous wave (CW)-T1ρ relaxation times on cartilage orientation were confirmed. T2 (and T2*) had the highest sensitivity to orientation, followed by TRAFF2 and adiabatic T2ρ. The highest dependence was seen in the highly organized deep cartilage and the smallest in the least organized transitional layer. Increasing spin-lock amplitude decreased the orientation dependence of CW-T1ρ. T1 was found practically orientation-independent and was closely followed by adiabatic T1ρ. The results suggest that T1 and adiabatic T1ρ should be preferred for orientation-independent quantitative assessment of organized tissues such as articular cartilage. On the other hand, based on the literature, parameters with higher orientation anisotropy appear to be more sensitive to degenerative changes in cartilage.

7 August 2014 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJari Rautiainen
Jari Rautiainen
Mikko J NissiMikko J Nissi
Mikko J Nissi
ESElli‐Noora Salo
Elli‐Noora Salo
VTVirpi Tiitu
Virpi Tiitu
MFMikko A.J. Finnilä
Mikko A.J. Finnilä
MNMiika T. Nieminen
Miika T. Nieminen