Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is diagnosed based on the presence of clinical symptoms such as rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal itching using negative skin prick testing and serum IgE assessment. Several novel studies have shown that it is possible to use the assessment of nasal sIgE (specific immunoglobulin E) secretion as an additional diagnostic criterion for local allergic rhinitis. Additionally, allergen immunotherapy is a promising—albeit still not fully assessed and evaluated—future method of managing patients with LAR. In this review, the historical background, epidemiology, and main pathophysiological mechanisms of LAR shall be presented. Additionally, we address the current state of knowledge based on selected articles regarding the assessment of the local mucosal IgE presence in response to exposure to such allergens as mites, pollen, molds, and others. The impact of LAR on quality of life as well as the possible options of management (including allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which showed promising results) will then be presented.

Vasculitis of the central nervous system can be a localized process, such as primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS), or systemic vasculitis, such as ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Since both conditions share neurological manifestations, the following review will discuss the neurological aspects of both. This review aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation and assessment, diagnostic workup, and treatment protocol for both PACNS and AAV with central nervous system involvement. To provide a comprehensive comparison and update, a literature review was conducted using PubMed and Ovid databases (Embase and Medline). Then, the references were retrieved, screened, and selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. PACNS and AAV share similarities in clinical presentation and neurological symptoms, especially in terms of headache, focal deficits, and cognitive impairment. Additionally, both conditions may exhibit similarities in laboratory and radiological findings, making brain biopsy the gold standard for differentiation between the two conditions. Moreover, the treatment protocols for PACNS and AAV are nearly identical. Comparing PACNS and AAV with CNS involvement highlights the similarities in clinical presentation, radiological findings, and treatment protocols between the two conditions. Further research should focus on establishing a practical diagnostic protocol.

The interplay between Psoriatic arthritis and Gout is a current diagnostic challenge faced by many physicians and researchers. We aimed at reviewing the coexistence of gout and its features such as hyperuricemia and deposition of monosodium urate crystals in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We also focused on a brief presentation of the pathophysiology underneath the interplay between PsA and gout, and ultimately on recommendation of approaches for the differential diagnosis. The literature search for this narrative review was conducted using PubMed and Medline and after retrieving and screening the references, articles were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Part of the assessed studies reported the coexistence of PsA and gout (Psout) and its association with several clinical outcomes among affected patients. Other studies stressed incidences of misdiagnosis of gout with PsA and vice versa. Additionally, the presence of hyperuricemia in PsA patients could interfere with the patient’s characteristics and outcomes of their treatment. Further research on the assessment and clinical course of Psout is required to develop an official protocol for its diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction: Apart from the typical AR phenotype and its standard clinical manifestations—rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal itching, and congestion—the so-called local allergic rhinitis (LAR) can be observed in a subset of subjects presenting rhinitis symptoms, a negative skin prick test (SPT), and serum-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) for the relevant allergens and confirmed with a positive nasal provocation test (NPT), which is the gold standard in LAR diagnosis. Our study aims to assess the clinical symptoms and local mucosal sIgE presence induced by NPT and natural exposure to HDM allergens in subjects with suspected LAR. Methods: In total, 25 suspected LAR subjects were included in the study. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used for the subjective assessment. A nasal provocation test (NPT) was performed with house dust mite allergens. The nasal lavage technique was used for nasal secretion acquisition, in which the levels of sIgE were measured. Results: During the period of increased exposure vs. the off-exposure period, the TNSS and VAS were significantly higher (p = 0.0361 and p = 0.0031, respectively). Levels of IgE specific to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in nasal lavage were high (p = 0.0502). Similarly, high levels of sIgE to Dermatophagoides farinae were noted (p = 0.0164). Comparing pre-NPT and post-NPT results, LAR diagnosis was confirmed in 8 subjects. Only the VAS score was higher after a positive NPT. Both sIgE to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae in nasal lavage were higher after a positive NPT; however, the change was not statistically significant. A higher fold change in the median relative value (sIgE/Total IgE) for both allergens was noted in the positive-NPT group compared to the negative-NPT group. Conclusions: Assessing the local nasal production of sIgE and other inflammatory mediators may contribute to expanding our knowledge of LAR pathogenesis. Further studies including a larger number of subjects are needed for a better understanding of the LAR entity in terms of diagnosis and treatment options.

The benefits of regular physical exercise, primarily moderate-intensity exercise, are widely known, recognized, and acclaimed. As an important lifestyle modification, regular training activities are gaining increasing popularity in the general population. Apart from the obvious benefits, physical exercise may carry the risk of trauma, cardiovascular events, and exercise-induced asthma and bronchoconstriction, to name just a few well-known clinical situations reported in athletes, both recreational and competitive. In susceptible individuals, acute bouts of exercise may lead to the appearance of urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis. Among these three clinical phenomena, angioedema is the least addressed and recognized, often being considered an accompanying clinical feature of urticaria or a hallmark of imminent anaphylactic reaction. To fill this knowledge gap, in this review, we focus on exercise-associated angioedema symptoms and highlight their most important features, both as isolated phenomena and in association with urticaria or anaphylaxis.

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a destructive inflammatory disease which was reported to have the longest diagnostic delay among the inflammatory rheumatic disease. This lag period have a great impact on the clinical outcome and socioeconomic state of the patients. With the advent of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, early diagnosis in AS has become important(1). Objectives: to evaluate the period from symptom onset to diagnosis of AS in Egyptian patients and to examine possible reasons for delayed diagnosis and its impact on the economic and social life of the patients. Methods: The study included 87 AS patients diagnosed according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria (2). A face-to-face interview was applied to take medical history, and a questionnaire that contains some clinical aspects of disease was used. Diagnosis delay was described as the gap between first AS symptom and correct diagnosis of AS. Clinical and functional assessment of axial SpA measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI). The direct medical cost during years of delay (including costs of medical consultations, medications, investigations, physiotherapy and surgical treatment) had been estimated by Egyptian pound. Results: The study included 87 AS patients with mean age (30.03±8.3), 70 male (80.5%) and 17 female (19.5%). Mean delay in diagnosis was(5.7 ±4.9) years. Mean of diagnostic delay for patient diagnosed before 2010 is (14±4.4) and that of patients diagnosed after 2010 is (3.5±1.8) with significant difference between both (p value<0.0001). The main cause of delay was incorrect diagnosis as follow degenerative disc disease (43/87, 49.4%), non-specific back pain (31/87, 35.6%), rheumatoid arthritis (10/87,11.5%), rheumatic fever (2/87, 2.3%) and tuberculosis of spine (1/87, 1.1%). The mean of the medical visits was (6±5.4). Most incorrect initial diagnoses were made by orthopedicians (57.9%), followed by neurologists (22.2%) followed by rheumatologist (10%) and general phyisicians (9.9%). Absence of extra-articular manifestations, negative family history and juvenile age are significantly associated with diagnostic delay. Delay in diagnosis is significantly associated with higher disease activity index(BASDAI), functional index (BASFI), and damage index(BASMI). The mean of the costs during years of delay is (15671.3±546.1) with the mean of cost per each year delay (660.9±6.6) with high significant association between the cost and longer delay in diagnosis (<0.0001). Regarding work ability, we found that(32.2%) are fit for work, unfit (29.9%), partially fit (37.9%) with high significant difference between ability of work and shorter delay. Regarding social effect, 40.2 % of patients developed negative effect on social life with significant association to diagnostic delay (0.004). Conclusion: Our study confirmed the importance of early diagnosis of AS due to its impact on patient’s health outcome and socioeconomic state.We recommend to increase the awareness about the disease among healthcare professionals in our region. References: [1]Sykes M. et al: Diagnostic delay in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis; Ann Rheum Dis.2015;74:e44. [2]Rudwaleit M. et al: The development of Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis; Ann Rheum Dis, 68 (2009), pp.777-783. Disclosure of Interests: None declared