Background and Objective: Transformers, which have been widely recognized as state-of-the-art tools in natural language processing (NLP), have also come to be recognized for their value in computer vision tasks. With this increasing popularity, they have also been extensively researched in the more complex medical imaging domain. The associated developments have resulted in transformers being on par with sought-after convolution neural networks, particularly for medical image segmentation. Methods combining both types of networks have proven to be especially successful in capturing local and global contexts, thereby significantly boosting their performances in various segmentation problems. Motivated by this success, we have attempted to survey the consequential research focused on innovative transformer networks, specifically those designed to cater to medical image segmentation in an efficient manner. Methods: Databases like Google Scholar, arxiv, ResearchGate, Microsoft Academic, and Semantic Scholar have been utilized to find recent developments in this field. Specifically, research in the English language from 2021 to 2023 was considered. Key Content and Findings: In this survey, we look into the different types of architectures and attention mechanisms that uniquely improve performance and the structures that are in place to handle complex medical data. Through this survey, we summarize the popular and unconventional transformer-based research as seen through different key angles and analyze quantitatively the strategies that have proven more advanced. Conclusions: We have also attempted to discern existing gaps and challenges within current research, notably highlighting the deficiency of annotated medical data for precise deep learning model training. Furthermore, potential future directions for enhancing transformers’ utility in healthcare are outlined, encompassing strategies such as transfer learning and exploiting foundation models for specialized medical image segmentation.
The Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grading system is a scoring system for classifying the severity of knee osteoarthritis using X-ray images, and it is the standard X-ray-based grading system for diagnosing knee osteoarthritis. However, KL grading depends on the clinician’s subjective assessment. Moreover, the accuracy varies significantly depending on the clinician’s experience and can be particularly low. Therefore, in this study, we developed an ensemble network that can predict a consistent and accurate KL grade for knee osteoarthritis severity using a deep learning approach. We trained individual models on knee X-ray datasets using the most suitable image size for each model in an ensemble network rather than using datasets with a single image size. We then built the ensemble network using these models to overcome the instability of single models and further improve accuracy. We conducted various experiments using a dataset of 8260 images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative open dataset. The proposed ensemble network exhibited the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 76.93% and an F1-score of 0.7665. The Grad-CAM visualization technique was used to further evaluate the focus of the model. The results demonstrated that the proposed ensemble network outperforms existing techniques that have performed well in KL grade classification. Moreover, the proposed model focuses on the joint space around the knee to extract the imaging features required for KL grade classification, revealing its high potential for diagnosing knee osteoarthritis.
We examined the feasibility of explainable computer-aided detection of cardiomegaly in routine clinical practice using segmentation-based methods. Overall, 793 retrospectively acquired posterior–anterior (PA) chest X-ray images (CXRs) of 793 patients were used to train deep learning (DL) models for lung and heart segmentation. The training dataset included PA CXRs from two public datasets and in-house PA CXRs. Two fully automated segmentation-based methods using state-of-the-art DL models for lung and heart segmentation were developed. The diagnostic performance was assessed and the reliability of the automatic cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) calculation was determined using the mean absolute error and paired t-test. The effects of thoracic pathological conditions on performance were assessed using subgroup analysis. One thousand PA CXRs of 1000 patients (480 men, 520 women; mean age 63 ± 23 years) were included. The CTR values derived from the DL models and diagnostic performance exhibited excellent agreement with reference standards for the whole test dataset. Performance of segmentation-based methods differed based on thoracic conditions. When tested using CXRs with lesions obscuring heart borders, the performance was lower than that for other thoracic pathological findings. Thus, segmentation-based methods using DL could detect cardiomegaly; however, the feasibility of computer-aided detection of cardiomegaly without human intervention was limited.
During clinical evaluation of patients and planning orthopedic treatments, the periodic assessment of lower limb alignment is critical. Currently, physicians use physical tools and radiographs to directly observe limb alignment. However, this process is manual, time consuming, and prone to human error. To this end, a deep-learning (DL)-based system was developed to automatically, rapidly, and accurately detect lower limb alignment by using anteroposterior standing X-ray medical imaging data of lower limbs. For this study, leg radiographs of non-overlapping 770 patients were collected from January 2016 to August 2020. To precisely detect necessary landmarks, a DL model was implemented stepwise. A radiologist compared the final calculated measurements with the observations in terms of the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Based on the results and 250 frontal lower limb radiographs obtained from 250 patients, the system measurements for 16 indicators revealed superior reliability (CCC, PCC, and ICC ≤ 0.9; mean absolute error, mean square error, and root mean square error ≥ 0.9) for clinical observations. Furthermore, the average measurement speed was approximately 12 s. In conclusion, the analysis of anteroposterior standing X-ray medical imaging data by the DL-based lower limb alignment diagnostic support system produces measurement results similar to those obtained by radiologists.
1 January 2020 in Journal of Korean Medical Science