Mikel Urroz-Elizalde

Dr. Mikel Urroz-Elizalde

Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlberto M Borobia
Alberto M Borobia
ACAntonio J Carcas
Antonio J Carcas
MPMayte Pérez-Olmeda
Mayte Pérez-Olmeda
LCLuis Castaño
Luis Castaño
MBMaría Jesús Bertran
María Jesús Bertran
JTJosé María Torvisco
José María Torvisco

13 September 2022 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKarin Hardt
Karin Hardt
AVAn Vandebosch
An Vandebosch
JSJerald Sadoff
Jerald Sadoff
MGMathieu Le Gars
Mathieu Le Gars
CTCarla Truyers
Carla Truyers
MZMarcus Zervos
Marcus Zervos

10 March 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEnrique Seco Meseguer
Enrique Seco Meseguer
MUMikel Urroz-Elizalde
Mikel Urroz-Elizalde
Alberto M BorobiaAlberto M Borobia
Alberto M Borobia
Elena RamírezElena Ramírez
Elena Ramírez
Introduction: Valproic acid (VPA) is an antiepileptic drug extensively used for treating partial and generalised seizures, acute mania and as prophylaxis for bipolar disorder. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) persists as a significant issue related to fatal outcomes by VPA. The aim of this study was to increase our knowledge about this condition and to better identify patients affected. Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective case-control study that identified cases of DILI by VPA from the Pharmacovigilance Programme from our Laboratory Signals at La Paz University Hospital from January 2007 to December 2019. From the Therapeutic VPA Monitoring program, two control groups were assigned, VPA-tolerant patients and the other with patients who developed mild VPA-related liver injury but who did not meet the DILI criteria, matched for date, age and sex. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study: 15 cases of DILI, 30 VPA-tolerant controls and 15 controls with mild liver injury. Mean age for the cases was 45.7 years, 4 (26.7%) were women and 5 (33.34%) were children under 18 years, of them 3 (20%) were fatal. Polytherapy with other antiepileptic drugs (p = 0.047) and alcohol consumption (p < 0.001) were associated with a greater risk of developing DILI by VPA. A diagnosis of epileptic seizure was more frequently related to DILI when compared with the VPA-tolerant controls (p < 0.001). The cases developed hepatocellular liver injury (p < 0.001), while the mild hepatic damage controls had a higher rate of cholestatic liver injury (p < 0.001). The laboratory lactate dehydrogenase values were statistically higher (even at baseline) in patients with DILI than in both control groups (p = 0.033 and p = 0.039). Conclusions: VPA hepatotoxicity remains a considerable problem. This study offers interesting findings for characterising VPA-induced liver injury and at-risk patients.

27 September 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAna Delgado
Ana Delgado
SBStefan STEWART BALBAS
Stefan STEWART BALBAS
MUMikel Urroz-Elizalde
Mikel Urroz-Elizalde
ARAmelia Rodríguez
Amelia Rodríguez
Alberto M BorobiaAlberto M Borobia
Alberto M Borobia
Elena RamírezElena Ramírez
Elena Ramírez
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. An elevation of liver damage markers has been observed in numerous cases, which could be related to the empirical use of potentially hepatotoxic drugs. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and analytical characteristics and perform a causality analysis from laboratory signals available of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) detected by a proactive pharmacovigilance program in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 at La Paz University Hospital in Madrid (Spain) from 1 March 2020 to 31 December 2020. The updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) was employed to assess DILI causality. A lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was performed on 10 patients. Ultimately, 160 patients were included. The incidence of DILI (alanine aminotransferase >5, upper limit of normal) was 4.9%; of these, 60% had previous COVID-19 hepatitis, the stay was 8.1 days longer and 98.1% were being treated with more than 5 drugs. The most frequent mechanism was hepatocellular (57.5%), with mild severity (87.5%) and subsequent recovery (88.1%). The most commonly associated drugs were hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, tocilizumab and ceftriaxone. The highest incidence rate of DILI per 10,000 defined daily doses (DDD) was with remdesivir (992.7/10,000 DDD). Some 80% of the LTTs performed were positive, with a RUCAM score of ≥4. The presence of DILI after COVID-19 was associated with longer hospital stays. An immune mechanism has been demonstrated in a small subset of DILI cases.

27 August 2022 in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFSalvador Fudio
Salvador Fudio
ASAlvaro Sellers
Alvaro Sellers
LRLaura Pérez Ramos
Laura Pérez Ramos
BGBeatriz Gil-Alberdi
Beatriz Gil-Alberdi
AZAli Zeaiter
Ali Zeaiter
RLRubin Lubomirov
Rubin Lubomirov

3 December 2020 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elena RamírezElena Ramírez
Elena Ramírez
MUMikel Urroz-Elizalde
Mikel Urroz-Elizalde
ARAmelia Rodríguez
Amelia Rodríguez
MGMiguel González-Muñoz
Miguel González-Muñoz
AMAlberto Martín-Vega
Alberto Martín-Vega
Alberto M BorobiaAlberto M Borobia
Alberto M Borobia
BACKGROUND: From March to April 2020, Spain was the center of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, particularly Madrid with approximately 30% of the cases in Spain. The aim of this study is to report the suspected serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) in COVID-19 patients vs. non-COVID-19 patients detected by the prospective pharmacovigilance program based on automatic laboratory signals (ALSs) in the hospital (PPLSH) during that period. We also compared the results with the suspected SADRs detected during the same period for 2019.METHODS: All ALSs that reflected potential SADRs including neutropenia, pancytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, eosinophilia, leukocytes in cerebrospinal fluid, hepatitis, pancreatitis, acute kidney injury, rhabdomyolysis, and hyponatremia were prospectively monitored in hospitalized patients during the study periods. We analyzed the incidence and the distribution of causative drugs for the COVID-19 patients.RESULTS: The incidence rate of SADRs detected in the COVID-19 patients was 760.63 (95% CI 707.89–816.01) per 10,000 patients, 4.75-fold higher than the SADR rate for non-COVID-19 patients (160.15 per 10,000 patients, 95% CI 137.09–186.80), and 5.84-fold higher than the SADR rate detected for the same period in 2019 (130.19 per 10,000 patients, 95% CI 109.53–154.36). The most frequently related drugs were tocilizumab (59.84%), dexketoprofen (13.93%), azithromycin (8.43%), lopinavir-ritonavir (7.35%), dexamethasone (7.62%), and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (6.91%).CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of SADRs detected by the PPSLH in patients with COVID-19 was 4.75-fold higher than that of the non-COVID-19 patients. Caution is recommended when using medications for COVID-19 patients, especially drugs that are hepatotoxic, myotoxic, and those that induce thromboembolic events.