Nani Oliveira-Carvalho

Ms. Nani Oliveira-Carvalho

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 April 2023 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBarbara Salgado
Barbara Salgado
MJMaele Ferreira Jordão
Maele Ferreira Jordão
TMThiago Barros Do Nascimento de Morais
Thiago Barros Do Nascimento de Morais
DSDanielle Sena Severino
Danielle Sena Severino
IFIvanildo Vieira Pereira Filho
Ivanildo Vieira Pereira Filho
PLPritesh Lalwani
Pritesh Lalwani
Numerous studies have focused on inflammation-related markers to understand COVID-19. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) protein-specific IgA, total IgG and IgG subclass response in COVID-19 patients and compared this to their disease outcome. We observed that the SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits a robust IgA and IgG response against the N-terminal (N1) and C-terminal (N3) region of the N protein, whereas we failed to detect IgA antibodies and observed a weak IgG response against the disordered linker region (N2) in COVID-19 patients. N and S protein-specific IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3 response was significantly elevated in hospitalized patients with severe disease compared to outpatients with non-severe disease. IgA and total IgG antibody reactivity gradually increased after the first week of symptoms. Magnitude of RBD-ACE2 blocking antibodies identified in a competitive assay and neutralizing antibodies detected by PRNT assay correlated with disease severity. Generally, the IgA and total IgG response between the discharged and deceased COVID-19 patients was similar. However, significant differences in the ratio of IgG subclass antibodies were observed between discharged and deceased patients, especially towards the disordered linker region of the N protein. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 infection is linked to an elevated blood antibody response in severe patients compared to non-severe patients. Monitoring of antigen-specific serological response could be an important tool to accompany disease progression and improve outcomes.

1 January 2022 in Molecular Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LOLucilla Silva Oliveira-Mendonça
Lucilla Silva Oliveira-Mendonça
DLDanielle de Sousa Lopes
Danielle de Sousa Lopes
ABAdriana Bozzi
Adriana Bozzi
Nani Oliveira-CarvalhoNani Oliveira-Carvalho
Nani Oliveira-Carvalho
TQThamires Queiroz-Oliveira
Thamires Queiroz-Oliveira
JSJane Santos
Jane Santos

30 October 2025 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNésio Fernandes de Medeiros-Junior
Nésio Fernandes de Medeiros-Junior
MGMaria da Penha Gomes Gouvea
Maria da Penha Gomes Gouvea
LCLuiz Antônio Bastos Camacho
Luiz Antônio Bastos Camacho
DVDaniel A. M. Villela
Daniel A. M. Villela
SLSheila Barbosa Lima
Sheila Barbosa Lima
VVValeria Valim
Valeria Valim
Background: Dose-sparing approaches can be effective in maintaining immunogenicity and safety while expanding vaccine coverage. We previously demonstrated that a half dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is as effective and immunogenic for primary vaccination. Methods: This non-inferiority, non-randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, humoral, and cellular immune responses of a third booster dose—comparing half-dose and full-dose regimens—in individuals aged 18–49 years, with a 1-year follow-up. Results: A total of 2801 participants were enrolled: 2352 received half doses and 449 received full doses. The incidence rate of COVID-19 was 225.0 per 1000 person-years in the half-dose group and 173.8 in the full-dose group, with no significant difference in effectiveness (β = −0.05; 95% CrI: −0.24 to 0.15). No deaths occurred, and hospitalization rates were similar. In a subsample (n = 558), anti-S IgG levels peaked 28 days post-dose and declined by day 180 after the primary series [175 (121–252) vs. 121 (71–208) GMT, p < 0.001], but remained elevated after the booster [192.1 (124–297) vs. 550 (380–797) GMT, p < 0.001]. Booster antibody levels were similar between groups [592.4 (318–1140) vs. 550 (380–797) GMT]. The half-dose group showed high titers against Omicron and robust T/B-cell responses (e.g., EMCD4, EMCD8, IFN+CD4+, CD19+TNF+). Conclusions: Fractional half dose of ChAdOx nCov-19 was effective and non-inferior to a full booster dose. Homologous regimen with 3 half doses or 3 full doses induced a similar increase in antibody titers and robust cellular response. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05059106).

9 November 2024 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GOGabriela Oliveira
Gabriela Oliveira
ICIsmael Artur Costa-Rocha
Ismael Artur Costa-Rocha
Nani Oliveira-CarvalhoNani Oliveira-Carvalho
Nani Oliveira-Carvalho
TSTâmilla Santos
Tâmilla Santos
ACAna Carolina Campi-Azevedo
Ana Carolina Campi-Azevedo
OMOlindo Martins-filho
Olindo Martins-filho
The present study aimed to evaluate the kinetics of the phenotypic profile and integrative networks of T/B-cells in severe COVID-19 patients, categorized according to disease outcome, during the circulation of the B.1.1.28 and B.1.1.33 SARS-CoV-2 strains in Brazil. Peripheral blood obtained at distinct time points (baseline/D0; D7; D14-28) was used for ex vivo flow cytometry immunophenotyping. The data demonstrated a decrease at D0 in the frequency of CD3+ T-cells and CD4+ T-cells and an increase in B-cells with mixed activation/exhaustion profiles. Higher changes in B-cell and CD4+ T-cells at D7 were associated with discharge/death outcomes, respectively. Regardless of the lower T/B-cell connectivity at D0, distinct profiles from D7/D14-28 revealed that, while discharge was associated with increasing connectivity for B-cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells death was related to increased connectivity involving B-cells, but with lower connections mediated by CD4+ T-cells. The CD4+CD38+ and CD8+CD69+ subsets accurately classified COVID-19 vs. healthy controls throughout the kinetic analysis. Binary logistic regression identified CD4+CD107a+, CD4+T-bet+, CD8+CD69+, and CD8+T-bet+ at D0 and CD4+CD45RO+CD27+ at D7 as subsets associated with disease outcomes. Results showed that distinct phenotypic timeline kinetics and integrative networks of T/B-cells are associated with COVID-19 outcomes that may subsidize the establishment of applicable biomarkers for clinical/therapeutic monitoring.