Nattapol Tangsuphoom

Prof. Dr. Nattapol Tangsuphoom

Food and Nutrition Academic and Research Cluster, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2005 in Journal of Food Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NTNattapol Tangsuphoom
Nattapol Tangsuphoom
JCJohn N. Coupland
John N. Coupland

9 January 2017 in Journal of Food Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNitjaree Maneerat
Nitjaree Maneerat
NTNattapol Tangsuphoom
Nattapol Tangsuphoom
ANAnadi Nitithamyong
Anadi Nitithamyong

1 October 2008 in Food Hydrocolloids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNattapol Tangsuphoom
Nattapol Tangsuphoom
JCJohn N. Coupland
John N. Coupland

1 October 2009 in Food Hydrocolloids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNattapol Tangsuphoom
Nattapol Tangsuphoom
JCJohn N. Coupland
John N. Coupland

1 August 2008 in Journal of Food Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NTNattapol Tangsuphoom
Nattapol Tangsuphoom
JCJ.N. Coupland
J.N. Coupland

27 June 2014 in BMC Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TATahmeed Ahmed
Tahmeed Ahmed
NCNuzhat Choudhury
Nuzhat Choudhury
MHMd Iqbal Hossain
Md Iqbal Hossain
NTNattapol Tangsuphoom
Nattapol Tangsuphoom
MIM Munirul Islam
M Munirul Islam
PCParul Christian
Parul Christian
Inadequate energy and micronutrient intake during childhood is a major public health problem in developing countries. Ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) made of locally available food ingredients can improve micronutrient status and growth of children. The objective of this study was to develop RUSF using locally available food ingredients and test their acceptability. A checklist was prepared of food ingredients available and commonly consumed in Bangladesh that have the potential of being used for preparing RUSF. Linear programming was used to determine possible combinations of ingredients and micronutrient premix. To test the acceptability of the RUSF compared to Pushti packet (a cereal based food-supplement) in terms of amount taken by children, a clinical trial was conducted among 90 children aged 6–18 months in a slum of Dhaka city. The mothers were also asked to rate the color, flavor, mouth-feel, and overall liking of the RUSF by using a 7-point Hedonic Scale (1 = dislike extremely, 7 = like extremely). Two RUSFs were developed, one based on rice-lentil and the other on chickpea. The total energy obtained from 50 g of rice-lentil, chickpea-based RUSF and Pushti packet were 264, 267 and 188 kcal respectively. Children were offered 50 g of RUSF and they consumed (mean ± SD) 23.8 ± 14 g rice-lentil RUSF, 28.4 ± 15 g chickpea based RUSF. Pushti packet was also offered 50 g but mothers were allowed to add water, and children consumed 17.1 ± 14 g. Mean feeding time for two RUSFs and Pushti packet was 20.9 minutes. Although the two RUSFs did not differ in the amount consumed, there was a significant difference in consumption between chickpea-based RUSF and Pushti packet (p = 0.012). Using the Hedonic Scale the two RUSFs were more liked by mothers compared to Pushti packet. Recipes of RUSF were developed using locally available food ingredients. The study results suggest that rice-lentil and chickpea-based RUSF are well accepted by children. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01553877 . Registered 24 January 2012.