Navid J. Ayon

Dr. Navid J. Ayon

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 May 2023 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Navid J. AyonNavid J. Ayon
Navid J. Ayon
Due to the continued emergence of resistance and a lack of new and promising antibiotics, bacterial infection has become a major public threat. High-throughput screening (HTS) allows rapid screening of a large collection of molecules for bioactivity testing and holds promise in antibacterial drug discovery. More than 50% of the antibiotics that are currently available on the market are derived from natural products. However, with the easily discoverable antibiotics being found, finding new antibiotics from natural sources has seen limited success. Finding new natural sources for antibacterial activity testing has also proven to be challenging. In addition to exploring new sources of natural products and synthetic biology, omics technology helped to study the biosynthetic machinery of existing natural sources enabling the construction of unnatural synthesizers of bioactive molecules and the identification of molecular targets of antibacterial agents. On the other hand, newer and smarter strategies have been continuously pursued to screen synthetic molecule libraries for new antibiotics and new druggable targets. Biomimetic conditions are explored to mimic the real infection model to better study the ligand–target interaction to enable the designing of more effective antibacterial drugs. This narrative review describes various traditional and contemporaneous approaches of high-throughput screening of natural products and synthetic molecule libraries for antibacterial drug discovery. It further discusses critical factors for HTS assay design, makes a general recommendation, and discusses possible alternatives to traditional HTS of natural products and synthetic molecule libraries for antibacterial drug discovery.

12 November 2018 in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Navid J. AyonNavid J. Ayon
Navid J. Ayon
ASAmar Deep Sharma
Amar Deep Sharma
WGWilliam G. Gutheil
William G. Gutheil

6 March 2023 in Nature Chemical Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LCLindsay K. Caesar
Lindsay K. Caesar
FBFatma A. Butun
Fatma A. Butun
MRMatthew T. Robey
Matthew T. Robey
Navid J. AyonNavid J. Ayon
Navid J. Ayon
RGRaveena Gupta
Raveena Gupta
NKNeil Kelleher
Neil Kelleher

1 January 2020 in AIMS Molecular Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Navid J. AyonNavid J. Ayon
Navid J. Ayon
Amino acids (AAs) are important biomolecules responsible for plethora of functions in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. There are 22 naturally occurring amino acids, among which 20 common amino acids appear in the genetic code and known as proteinogenic amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. Proteinogenic amino acids exist in two isomeric forms (except glycine) and the biological activity is often attributed to a specific stereoisomer. Most of the amino acids found in protein is predominantly L-AAs. A few D-amino acids can be found in bacterial cell wall, some marine invertebrates and higher organisms including frog, snail, spider, rat, chicken and human. Besides their role in protein synthesis, different proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers have found to perform important biological roles either by functioning as precursors of a myriad of other bioactive molecules or by indicating several biological phenomena i.e. acting as markers for different physiological conditions. Given the biological importance of L- and D-amino acids (AAs), improved analytical methods for their resolution and accurate quantification remain of keen interest. Chiral analysis of amino acids in complex biological matrices poses numerous analytical challenges that are exacerbated by broad differences in polarity and ionization efficiencies of the proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers. To date, various analytical methods are reported for chiral amino acid analysis including chromatographic, spectrometric, enzymatic, fluidic, electrophoretic and microbiological techniques. Advances in stationary phase, derivatization chemistry and instrumentation contributed to achieving baseline separation and accurate detection of trace levels of proteinogenic amino acids stereoisomers in different matrices. However, liquid and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry based analytical methods remain the most popular platform in chiral amino acid analysis in terms of feasibility and performance. This review discusses different physicochemical and biological features and functions of proteinogenic amino acid stereoisomers and lists a variety of established chromatography and mass spectrometry based analytical methods for their analysis reported to date.

1 January 2017 in Analytical Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HVHarika Vemula
Harika Vemula
YKYukiko Kitase
Yukiko Kitase
Navid J. AyonNavid J. Ayon
Navid J. Ayon
LBLynda Bonewald
Lynda Bonewald
WGWilliam G. Gutheil
William G. Gutheil

1 February 2016 in Biochimie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HVHarika Vemula
Harika Vemula
Navid J. AyonNavid J. Ayon
Navid J. Ayon
WGWilliam G. Gutheil
William G. Gutheil