Nasir Farsad Layegh

Mr. Nasir Farsad Layegh

Capgemini (Netherlands), Utrecht, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2021 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Meisam AmaniMeisam Amani
Meisam Amani
Arsalan GhorbanianArsalan Ghorbanian
Arsalan Ghorbanian
MAMilad Asgarimehr
Milad Asgarimehr
BYBahareh Yekkehkhany
Bahareh Yekkehkhany
AMArmin Moghimi
Armin Moghimi
NLNasir Farsad Layegh
Nasir Farsad Layegh
Reliable, accurate, and timely information about oceans is important for many applications, including water resource management, hydrological cycle monitoring, environmental studies, agricultural and ecosystem health applications, economy, and the overall health of the environment. In this regard, remote sensing (RS) systems offer exceptional advantages for mapping and monitoring various oceanographic parameters with acceptable temporal and spatial resolutions over the oceans and coastal areas. So far, different methods have been developed to study oceans using various RS systems. This urges the necessity of having review studies that comprehensively discuss various RS systems, including passive and active sensors, and their advantages and limitations for ocean applications. In this article, the goal is to review most RS systems and approaches that have been worked on marine applications. This review paper is divided into two parts. Part 1 is dedicated to the passive RS systems for ocean studies. As such, four primary passive systems, including optical, thermal infrared radiometers, microwave radiometers, and Global Navigation Satellite Systems, are comprehensively discussed. Additionally, this article summarizes the main passive RS sensors and satellites, which have been utilized for different oceanographic applications. Finally, various oceanographic parameters, which can be retrieved from the data acquired by passive RS systems, along with the corresponding methods, are discussed.

11 January 2022 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Meisam AmaniMeisam Amani
Meisam Amani
Farzane MohseniFarzane Mohseni
Farzane Mohseni
NLNasir Farsad Layegh
Nasir Farsad Layegh
MNMohsen Eslami Nazari
Mohsen Eslami Nazari
Farzam FatolazadehFarzam Fatolazadeh
Farzam Fatolazadeh
AMArmin Moghimi
Armin Moghimi
As discussed in the previous part of this review paper, Remote Sensing (RS) creates unprecedented opportunities by providing a variety of systems with different characteristics to study and monitor oceans. Part 1 of this review paper was dedicated to reviewing passive RS systems and their main applications in the ocean. Here, in part 2, seven active RS systems, including scatterometers, altimeters, gravimeters, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Sound Navigation and Ranging (SONAR), High-Frequency (HF) radars are comprehensively reviewed. For consistency, this part is structured similarly to part 1. The aforementioned systems, along with their characteristics and primary applications, are introduced in separate sections. This review paper provides useful information to all students and researchers who are interested in the oceanographic applications of active RS systems.

1 February 2021 in Measurement
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HWHaoyu Wang
Haoyu Wang
JBJos Berkers
Jos Berkers
NHNick van Den Hurk
Nick van Den Hurk
NLNasir Farsad Layegh
Nasir Farsad Layegh


27 July 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLNasir Farsad Layegh
Nasir Farsad Layegh
Roshanak DarvishzadehRoshanak Darvishzadeh
Roshanak Darvishzadeh
ASAndrew Skidmore
Andrew Skidmore
Claudio PerselloClaudio Persello
Claudio Persello
NKNina Krüger
Nina Krüger
In complex classification tasks, such as the classification of heterogeneous vegetation covers, the high similarity between classes can confuse the classification algorithm when assigning the correct class labels to unlabelled samples. To overcome this problem, this study aimed to develop a classification method by integrating graph-based semi-supervised learning (SSL) and an expert system (ES). The proposed method was applied to vegetation cover classification in a wetland in the Netherlands using Sentinel-2 and RapidEye imagery. Our method consisted of three main steps: object-based image analysis (OBIA), integration of SSL and an ES (SSLES), and finally, random forest classification. The generated image objects and the related features were used to construct the graph in SSL. Then, an independently developed and trained ES was used in the labelling stage of SSL to reduce the uncertainty of the process, before the final classification. Different spectral band combinations of Sentinel-2 were then considered to improve the vegetation classification. Our results show that integrating SSL and an ES can result in significantly higher classification accuracy (83.6%) compared to a supervised classifier (64.9%), SSL alone (71.8%), and ES alone (69.5%). Moreover, utilisation of all Sentinel-2 red-edge spectral band combinations yielded the highest classification accuracy (overall accuracy of 83.6% with SSLES) compared to the inclusion of other band combinations. The results of this study indicate that the utilisation of an ES in the labelling process of SSL improves the reliability of the process and provides robust performance for the classification of vegetation cover.