Modern tympanoplasty is successful in radical eradication of pathologic processes owing to microscopic and endoscopic control, preoperative computed tomography, and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. However, inadequate aeration is unresolved in tympanoplasty. Negative tympanic cavity pressure can lead to ossicular osteolysis, extrusion of the prosthesis, or recurrent perforation and retraction of the graft. Attention has been directed to the choice of grafting material, which should be mechanically stable and have necessary acoustic performance for good sound transmission. Autologous materials such as temporalis fascia, cartilage, and perichondrium provide these characteristics, and each has specific advantages and disadvantages. Studies
1-3 have shown that cartilage and temporalis fascia are associated with minimal tissue reaction and absorption; temporalis fascia shows particularly poorer dimensional stability and significant shrinkage after rehydrating. In contrast, some investigations have demonstrated loss of acoustic energy using thick-shield cartilage grafting, while others have shown the opposite.
4 The choice of temporalis fascia or cartilage should not be one of surgeon preference but should be derived based on knowledge of different prognostic aspects such as demographic factors, disease-associated issues, and technical reasons (perioperative bleeding, the use of a graft that is too small, etc).
5,6