The ocular surface is susceptible to a wide spectrum of inflammatory, degenerative, and neurotrophic diseases that can impair vision. The complex pathophysiology and limited therapeutic options associated with these conditions continue to pose significant clinical challenges. Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), a neurotrophin initially recognized for its role in neuronal survival and differentiation, has emerged as a key regulator of ocular surface homeostasis and repair. Beyond its neurotrophic functions, NGF is suggested to influence epithelial proliferation, immune responses, tear secretion, and angiogenesis. Experimental and clinical studies have implicated NGF in both the pathogenesis and potential treatment of various ocular surface diseases, including allergic conjunctivitis, neurotrophic keratopathy (NK), immune-mediated and herpetic keratitis, and dry eye disease (DED), as well as post-surgical corneal wound healing. Notably, recombinant human NGF (rhNGF, cenegermin) has been approved as the first topical biologic therapy for NK. Despite encouraging clinical outcomes, challenges such as high treatment costs, limited long-term data, and potential proangiogenic effects remain. This review consolidates current evidence on the role of NGF in ocular surface health and disease, highlighting its biological mechanisms, clinical applications, and future therapeutic potential.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a slow-growing, locally invasive tumor of epithelial origin. The common sites of origin are the minor and major salivary glands and also the lacrimal glands. ACC accounts for 4.8% of primary orbital neoplasms and commonly arises superolaterally from the main lacrimal gland. Primary ACC of the orbit from an extra lacrimal region is quite rare. We present a case of ACC that occurred in ectopic lacrimal gland tissue involving the medial region of both orbits. A 74-year-old woman was admitted with a 4-week history of progressive painful proptosis in her left eye. Examination revealed a medium-size bilateral nasal canthal mass. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a nasal mass in both orbits with bone erosion. The patient underwent bilateral anterior orbitotomy and incisional biopsy was performed. Histopathology exam revealed an ACC with perineural and bone invasion. She refused orbital exenteration and radiation therapy was initiated.

Purpose The purpose of this double-masked, parallel randomised controlled trial was to compare the recurrence rate and other outcomes between conjunctival–limbal autograft (CLAu) and mini-simple limbal epithelial transplantation (mini-SLET) after excision of pterygium. Methods Eligibility criteria for participants was the presence of a primary nasal pterygium extending equally to or greater than two millimetres on the cornea on its horizontal axis from the nasal limbus. The participants were allocated into two groups (CLAu and mini-SLET) using simple randomisation with a table of random numbers. Participants and the outcome assessor were masked to the intervention. The study protocol is listed and available on https://clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03363282). Results A total of 61 eyes were enrolled in the study, 33 underwent CLAu (group 1) and 28 mini-SLET (group 2), all eyes were analysed in each group. At 2, 3, 6 and 12 months the CLAu group exhibited a recurrence of 0%, 6.1%, 8.1% and 8.1%, while the mini-SLET exhibited a recurrence of 0%, 17.9%, 50% and 53.5% (p<0.05). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in either of the two groups. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that mini-SLET has a higher recurrence rate and provides no advantage over CLAu in the treatment of primary pterygium.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a prevalent and disabling condition. Artificial tears are commonly used but often inadequate for moderate-to-severe cases. Secretagogues such as pilocarpine, cevimeline, and diquafosol offer potential alternatives, though their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of these secretagogues versus artificial tears in adults with DED, we searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing secretagogues to artificial tears were eligible. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted using Covidence and the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and 19 RCTs (n = 2697) were included. Fifteen were analyzed quantitatively; however, only eight trials evaluating diquafosol were suitable for meta-analysis, as data for pilocarpine and cevimeline were insufficient for quantitative synthesis. GRADE was used to assess evidence certainty. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020218407. Diquafosol significantly improved rose bengal staining at 4 weeks and OSDI scores and TBUT in post-cataract patients at 4 and 12 weeks. However, it increased mild adverse events (RR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.15–2.84). Evidence for pilocarpine and cevimeline was limited. Diquafosol 3% shows greater efficacy than artificial tears in post-cataract DED but with more side effects. Further research is needed for other secretagogues.

Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a condition that compromises the ocular surface and affects millions of people around the world. In recent years, a scheme has been proposed for the treatment of DED, with the use of artificial tear being the mainstay of treatment. In this scheme, the use of secretagogues is suggested as part of the treatment for patients with moderate to severe affectation. With this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of secretagogues for DED. Methods: Electronic databases will be searched; we will include randomized controlled trials that compare secretagogues and artificial tears. Study inclusion will not be restricted on the basis of language or publication status. We will use Google Translate to assess studies written in languages other than English and Spanish. Identification, evaluation, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias will be conducted by two authors of the review, a third review author will resolve any disagreement. The outcomes will be the ocular surface disease index score, tear film break-up time, Schirmer test score, VRQoL Score, and tear film osmolarity. We will use the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for assessing the risk of bias of the included studies. Based on the heterogeneity of the included studies, we will combine the findings in a meta-analysis using a fixed effect model if heterogeneity ≤ 50% or a random effect model if heterogeneity > 50%. If we deem meta-analysis as inappropriate, we will document the reasons and report findings from the individual studies narratively. Discussion: Based on the evidence obtained, we will evaluate the effect of pilocarpine, cevimeline, and diquafosol and compare it to artificial tears on multiple outcome measures. This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy and safety of the secretagogues pilocarpine, cevimeline, and diquafosol to help clinicians in the decision-making process. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42020218407.