Omar E. Benites-Alfaro

Omar E. Benites-Alfaro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 March 2019 in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPeter Selby
Peter Selby
RARafael Abbeloos
Rafael Abbeloos
JBJan Erik Backlund
Jan Erik Backlund
MSMartin Basterrechea Salido
Martin Basterrechea Salido
GBGuillaume Bauchet
Guillaume Bauchet
TCThe BrAPI consortium
The BrAPI consortium
Motivation: Modern genomic breeding methods rely heavily on very large amounts of phenotyping and genotyping data, presenting new challenges in effective data management and integration. Recently, the size and complexity of datasets have increased significantly, with the result that data are often stored on multiple systems. As analyses of interest increasingly require aggregation of datasets from diverse sources, data exchange between disparate systems becomes a challenge. Results: To facilitate interoperability among breeding applications, we present the public plant Breeding Application Programming Interface (BrAPI). BrAPI is a standardized web service API specification. The development of BrAPI is a collaborative, community-based initiative involving a growing global community of over a hundred participants representing several dozen institutions and companies. Development of such a standard is recognized as critical to a number of important large breeding system initiatives as a foundational technology. The focus of the first version of the API is on providing services for connecting systems and retrieving basic breeding data including germplasm, study, observation, and marker data. A number of BrAPI-enabled applications, termed BrAPPs, have been written, that take advantage of the emerging support of BrAPI by many databases. Availability and implementation: More information on BrAPI, including links to the specification, test suites, BrAPPs, and sample implementations is available at https://brapi.org/. The BrAPI specification and the developer tools are provided as free and open source.

20 March 2019 in Ecological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FLFlavio Lozano-Isla
Flavio Lozano-Isla
OBOmar E. Benites-Alfaro
Omar E. Benites-Alfaro
Marcelo Francisco PompelliMarcelo Francisco Pompelli
Marcelo Francisco Pompelli

24 December 2016
Verified
Dataset
Closed access
FLFlavio Lozano-Isla
Flavio Lozano-Isla
OBOmar E. Benites-Alfaro
Omar E. Benites-Alfaro
Marcelo Francisco PompelliMarcelo Francisco Pompelli
Marcelo Francisco Pompelli
DSDenise Garcia de Santana
Denise Garcia de Santana
MRMarli A. Ranal
Marli A. Ranal

13 November 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CVCristhian J. Ventura-Neyra
Cristhian J. Ventura-Neyra
SVSergio W. Copa Vizcarra
Sergio W. Copa Vizcarra
ECEyner M. Aguilar Chuquitarqui
Eyner M. Aguilar Chuquitarqui
BGBetty K. Guzman
Betty K. Guzman
OBOmar E. Benites-Alfaro
Omar E. Benites-Alfaro
JLJuancarlos Alejandro Cruz Luis
Juancarlos Alejandro Cruz Luis
The production and use of organic fertilizers and bioinputs can improve soil management and support more sustainable agricultural systems; however, evidence on their adoption following training programs among smallholder avocado farmers remains limited. This study evaluated whether participation in a training program on the production and use of organic fertilizers and bioinputs was associated with technical knowledge, adoption of promoted practices, and perceived barriers among avocado farmers in Moquegua, Peru. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 97 farmers. Propensity score matching yielded 34 matched pairs of participants and controls, followed by Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis and multivariable regression. Participants showed greater technical knowledge (17.50 vs. 6.67; p < 0.001) and a higher composite adoption index (2.59 vs. 1.73; p < 0.001). Although adoption varied across practices, participants reported higher frequencies across practices than controls. These differences were robust to hypothetical hidden bias (Γ > 6). Training participation remained associated with both outcomes after adjustment for observed sociodemographic and farm-related characteristics. Two of eight barriers were less frequent among participants, whereas barriers related to knowledge, time, and financial resources remained common in both groups. Overall, training participation was associated with greater knowledge and adoption, although barriers to practice implementation remained.