Purpose: Previous studies have reported that blood-based inflammatory markers are associated with prognosis in patients with various solid tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) is a novel prognostic biomarker based on blood count. Here, we aimed to study the association between PIV and survival following transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (CLM). Methods: A total of 49 patients with CLM who underwent TARE at the Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between clinical and laboratory parameters with post-TARE overall survival (OS) was analyzed by multivariate analyses. Results: The median age was 60 years and 71.4% of patients had received at least two lines of chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 59.1% following TARE. Patients with hepatic response after TARE treatment demonstrated significantly longer survival compared to non-responders (p: 0.033). The optimal PIV threshold value was calculated as 629 in ROC analyses. This PIV value had 81% sensitivity and 80% specificity for OS prediction (AUC 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75–0.98, p = 0.008). Patients with elevated PIV > 629 had significantly shorter OS (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, adjusted for ECOG PS, TARE response, presence of extrahepatic disease, number of chemotherapy lines, CEA levels and post-TARE NLR and PIV, only low PIV level was associated with longer OS (>629 vs. ≤629; HR: 4.87; 95% CI: 1.32–17.92; p = 0.017). Conclusions: PIV, a blood-based inflammatory score, may reflect the host’s immune response following TARE and serve as a novel predictor of survival.

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been established as a first-line maintenance therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following platinum-based chemotherapy. While phase III trials have demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefits with olaparib and niraparib, real-world data remain limited. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter real-world study included 179 patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian treated with first-line maintenance olaparib or niraparib across 33 centers in Türkiye between January 2014 and March 2025. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data—including BRCA (Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene) mutation status, origin, and variant classification—was collected. The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: Of 179 patients, 110 received olaparib and 69 received niraparib. BRCA mutations were present in 88.3% of patients, while 11.7% had unknown HRD status. Median follow-up was 16.5 months, and median PFS was not reached. Estimated PFS rates for the overall cohort were 91.0% at 6 months, 83.0% at 12 months, and 64.0% at 24 months. In the olaparib cohort, BRCA-mutant patients demonstrated PFS rates of 89%, 78%, 73%, and 64% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. In the niraparib cohort, corresponding PFS rates among BRCA-mutant patients were 87% at 6 months and 75% at 12 months. Patients harboring pathogenic BRCA variants experienced longer PFS compared with those with likely pathogenic variants. Any-grade adverse events occurred in 73.7% of patients, and grade 3–4 events in 29.6%, with hematologic toxicities predominating. Dose interruptions were more frequent with niraparib, while treatment discontinuation rates were low in both groups. No cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia were observed. Conclusions: In this large multicenter real-world cohort, first-line maintenance therapy with olaparib and niraparib provided durable PFS benefit in patients with advanced EOC, particularly among those with pathogenic BRCA mutations, confirming their effectiveness and manageable safety profiles in routine clinical practice.