Background: Wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) enables the investigation of neuromuscular control in realistic sports settings; however, ensuring reliable signal acquisition during sprinting remains challenging. This study examined the feasibility of continuous wireless EMG recording in sprinting athletes and evaluated their agonist–antagonist coordination patterns. Methods: Ten trained sprinters performed four maximal 50-m sprints on a force plate–equipped track. sEMG was recorded from the biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), soleus (Sol), and tibialis anterior (TA) under two receiver configurations: fixed-receiver condition (FRC) and mobile-receiver condition (MRC). Integrated EMG, kinematics, and cross-correlation analyses were performed on a stride-by-stride basis. Results: Continuous high-quality EMG was feasible under MRC, highlighting the practical importance of maintaining receiver proximity in sprint experiments. BF activity during the late swing phase correlated positively with sprint velocity, supporting the performance relevance of pawing. BF/RF interactions varied substantially across individuals, whereas Sol/TA were consistently coactivated, indicating ankle stabilization. Conclusions: Wireless EMG enables reliable in-field monitoring of sprinting athletes, revealing both individualized and shared coordination strategies relevant to performance and injury prevention in athletes.

Background: Age-related differences in neuromuscular coordination during multi-joint tasks are reported, but phase-specific evidence during maximal sprinting is limited. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate phase-specific age differences in agonist–antagonist coordination of the biarticular thigh muscles during 50 m sprinting. Methods: Thirty-eight healthy trained track athletes (Adults: n = 21, age = 23.32 ± 2.98 years; Adolescents: n = 17, age = 13.65 ± 0.76 years) performed maximal 50 m sprints over force plates. Bilateral rectus femoris (RF) and biceps femoris (BF) sEMG and ground reaction forces were recorded; each stride was segmented into seven phases, and an RF–BF co-contraction index (CCI) was calculated per phase. Between-group differences in phase mean CCI were tested (α = 0.05) and quantified with Hedges’ g. Speed- and frequency-dependent modulation of CCI was evaluated using linear mixed-effects models (LME; random intercepts for participant) with Frequency × Group and Speed × Group interaction terms; ordinary least squares (OLS) fits on stride cycle-level group means were descriptive. Linear and single-breakpoint segmented models were compared using the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) and Akaike weights. Results: Adolescents showed higher CCI in contact (right: Adults 0.09 ± 0.05 vs. Adolescents 0.13 ± 0.07, g = 0.68; left: Adults 0.08 ± 0.04 vs. Adolescents 0.12 ± 0.06, g = 0.84) and propulsive phases (right: Adults 0.08 ± 0.05 vs. Adolescents 0.13 ± 0.08, g = 0.68; left: Adults 0.07 ± 0.04 vs. Adolescents 0.12 ± 0.07, g = 0.84; p < 0.05 for both legs in both phases). LME identified Frequency × Group interactions in the stride cycle (ΔSlope = 0.10, p < 0.001) and late swing (ΔSlope = 0.12, p < 0.05) and a Speed × Group interaction in mid swing (ΔSlope = 0.01, p < 0.05). Mid swing showed a positive CCI–speed/frequency relationship in both groups, whereas across most other phases Adults downregulated CCI as speed/frequency increased while Adolescents tended to increase CCI. Model selection supported phase-dependent single-breakpoint patterns, with breakpoints around 2.19–2.21 Hz and 6.11–9.51 m·s⁻¹ in Adults and around 2.11 Hz and 7.13–7.59 m·s⁻¹ in Adolescents. Conclusions: Maximal sprinting revealed phase-specific age differences in BF–RF co-contraction and its scaling with speed/frequency, which may help guide age-informed monitoring and training considerations in developing athletes.