IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently recognized fibro-inflammatory disorder that can affect almost any organ. Common presentations include major salivary and lacrimal gland enlargement, orbital disease, autoimmune pancreatitis, retroperitoneal fibrosis and tubulointerstitial nephritis. The main histopathological features are a dense, polyclonal, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate rich in IgG4+ plasma cells, storiform fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis. The precise pathogenic mechanisms of IgG4-RD are still unclear. CD4+ T and B cells, including IgG4-expressing plasmablasts, constitute the major inflammatory cell populations and are believed to cause organ damage and tissue fibrosis. The diagnosis of the disease may be challenging and should be based on specific histopathological findings, typical laboratory and radiological aspects and an appropriate clinical context. The first-line treatment of IgG4-RD is based on glucocorticoids, which are usually efficacious. However, B cell depletion induced by rituximab has also been found to induce remission in steroid-resistant disease or has been used as steroid-sparing agent for relapsing disease. This review provides an update on clinical and therapeutic aspects of IgG4-RD.

Objective: Chronic periaortitis (CP) is a rare fibro-inflammatory disorder that incorporates idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms, and perianeurysmal retroperitoneal fibrosis. CP is included in the spectrum of IgG4-related disease. Since CP patients rarely undergo diagnostic biopsies, serum IgG4 levels are often used to classify CP as IgG4-related. However, the clinical and prognostic significance of serum IgG4 in CP is unknown. Methods: We measured serum IgG4 in active CP patients and compared the clinical characteristics, response to therapy and outcome of patients with high and normal levels. We also tested the diagnostic significance of IgG4 by comparing its levels in CP patients, healthy and disease controls (malignancies, Erdheim-Chester disease, large-, and small-vessel vasculitis). Results: We studied 113 consecutive patients with active CP. Twenty-four (21.2%) had high serum IgG4 (>135 mg/dL). The demographic, laboratory, and clinical characteristics of patients with high and normal IgG4 were similar, and so were the rates of ureteral obstruction and the disease characteristics on CT, MRI, and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET. Patients with high IgG4 only had a higher frequency of extra-retroperitoneal fibro-inflammatory lesions (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in response to therapy and relapses between the two groups. Serum IgG4 levels did not discriminate CP from controls. Conclusions: Serum IgG4 levels are high in a minority of CP patients and do not identify specific clinical or prognostic subgroups; only a higher frequency of extra-retroperitoneal lesions is found in high-IgG4 patients. Serum IgG4 levels do not help in the differential diagnosis between CP and its mimics.

Two articles this week focus on Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), a rare histiocytosis that mainly affects adults. Clonal somatic mutations primarily involving proteins in the BRAF and MPAK pathways have established ECD as a myeloid neoplasm, with targeted therapies now available for patients. In the first paper, an international panel presents new consensus recommendations for evaluation and treatment of ECD. In the second paper, Pegoraro and colleagues present long-term outcomes of patients with ECD treated with sirolimus, with responses in patients both with and without BRAF mutations.

In recent years, our understanding of the physiology of the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron (ASDN) has greatly advanced thanks to the discovery of the complex with-no-lysine kinase (WNK) signaling and the molecular characterization of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). A series of studies, initially focused on rare tubulopathies such as Gordon and Liddle syndromes, eventually led to a partial elucidation of the so-called “aldosterone paradox”, the traditional explanation of the physiology of such disparate conditions such as hyperkalemia and low effective arterial blood volume. The physiology of the ASDN is herein illustrated in light of the novel acquisitions in an easy-to-understand fashion, with the aim of giving the practicing nephrologist a solid “first glance” into this exciting but challenging field. Focus is on ion channels and transporters, their regulation by key hormones such as aldosterone and angiotensin II, and dietary implications.

Background Accelerated muscle wasting still represents a major issue in critically ill patients. However, a key problem in the intensive care unit is the lack of adequate tools for bedside evaluation of muscle mass. Moreover, when acute kidney injury (AKI) coexists, fluid overload and/or rapid fluid shifts due to renal replacement therapies that frequently occur and may interfere with muscle mass assessment. The purpose of this study is to validate muscle ultrasound (US) by a gold standard (muscle CT scan) for the assessment of quadriceps muscle thickness in critically ill patients with AKI. Methods Quadriceps rectus femoris thickness and quadriceps vastus intermedius thickness of critically ill patients with AKI were blindly assessed at the same leg sites by both US and computed tomography (CT) scan. Using bivariate mixed-model linear regression analysis, we estimated, average difference in thickness between measurement sites, agreement (differential and proportional bias) of US compared to CT, and precision of the two methods, and eventually performed Bland–Altman analysis for repeated measurements on pooled results. Results We analyzed 233 couples of measurements (30 patients). Average muscle thickness ranged between 1.0 and 1.6, depending on the measurement site. When comparing US to CT, both the observed differential bias (between + 0.04 and + 0.26 cm depending on the muscle site) and the proportional bias (between 82 and 98% of the reference values, depending on the muscle site) were not statistically significant. However, precision analysis showed that US scan tended to be slightly less precise in comparison to CT. Bland–Altman analysis on pooled results showed that the 95% limits of agreement between the US and CT were narrow, ranging from − 0.34 to + 0.36 cm. Conclusion In critically ill patients with AKI, quadriceps muscle thickness assessment based on US is unbiased, although it occurs with a minor loss of precision compared to CT.