Context: In vivo embryo production, also called multiple ovulation and embryo transfer, can accelerate genetic gain, and thus improve animal production. However, there are issues limiting a wider use of this biotechnology in sheep livestock. Aims: This study aimed to determine (1) whether a previous response to superovulation (SOV) can be used as a criterion to select ewes for in vivo embryo production, (2) whether the intensity of the SOV response (number of corpora lutea, CL) can affect the embryo recovery rate, and (3) whether the number of CL quantified by colour Doppler ultrasonography can be used to calculate the recovery rate. Methods: Twenty-five Santa Inês ewes underwent SOV three times (SOV1, SOV2 and SOV3), with 200 mg FSH and natural mating. The number of CL after each SOV was determined by laparoscopy and by colour Doppler ultrasonography. Key results: The number of CL significantly decreased (P < 0.05) after SOV1 (7.5 ± 4.8) to 3.0 ± 5.0 at SOV 2 and 2.2 ± 3.5 at SOV3. Strong correlations were observed between SOV2 and SOV3 in terms of numbers of CL (r = 0.86, r2 = 0.74; P < 0.0001) and viable embryos (r = 0.79, r2 = 0.63; P < 00001). However, no correlations were observed between SOV1 and SOV2 or between SOV1 and SOV3. Recovery rate did not differ with the intensity of the SOV response (≤6, 7–10, >10 CL) or between the methods used to quantify CL. Conclusions: Ewes did not show the same pattern of response when submitted to successive FSH-based SOV. The intensity of the SOV response did not affect the recovery rate, and the number of CL estimated by colour Doppler ultrasonography can be used to calculate the recovery rate. Implications: Selecting sheep embryo donors by a previous SOV response is not always feasible. The recovery rate is homogeneous and it is not affected by the intensity of the SOV response. A nonsurgical technique can be used to assess the recovery rate, improving animal welfare in MOET programs.

(1) Background: Leptospirosis, mainly determined by strains belonging to serogroup Sejroe, has a direct impact on the reproductive efficiency of ruminants, such as sheep. In Brazil, Leptospira santarosai serovar Guaricura, known to be able to chronically colonize the uterine environment, is of special note. Although vaccination minimizes the effects of acute disease, whether or not it can protect from renal colonization remains controversial, and its effects on the genital tract are unknown. In this context, the present study aims to investigate the efficacy of vaccination in the prevention of experimental genital leptospirosis. (2) Methods: Eighteen sheep were divided into three groups: one vaccinated with a polyvalent commercial bacterin, one vaccinated with an autologous bacterin, and one unvaccinated. After 14 days, the sheep were experimentally challenged with 10⁸ leptospires (L. santarosai, serogroup Sejroe, serovar Guaricura, strain FV52) intraperitoneally. Serology and colonization of the urinary and genital tracts were carried out monthly by PCR for 210 days in all animals. (3) Results: Vaccination significantly elicited antibody titers with a predominance of agglutinins against serogroup Sejroe. Both urinary and genital infections were confirmed by PCR. Positivity in urine PCR was absent after D120, while genital infection persisted until the end of the study. Serological results and the finding that vaccination did not avoid renal colonization align with previous studies. Despite vaccination, Leptospira established chronic and asymptomatic colonization of the genital tract until D210, an outstanding finding that remains to be fully understood in its mechanisms. (4) Conclusions: This is the first study conducted to analyze the effects of vaccination in the prevention of genital leptospirosis.

There is still no consensus regarding the best protocol for in vivo embryo production in sheep despite increasing studies in this area. Moreover, there is variability in the response of ewes to superovulation (SOV). An approach to mitigate this inconsistency is to initiate gonadotropin administration under favorable ovarian conditions. The present study compared three treatments in a crossover design: a traditional SOV protocol (TRAD) and “Day 0” D0 SOV protocol with (D0+GnRH), or without Lecilerin (D0-GnRH). Fifteen Santa Inês ewes received 200 mg of FSH at six decreasing doses and PGF2α with the fifth dose of FSH. They were naturally mated with fertile rams and subjected to surgical embryo collection. The number of viable embryos was similar among the different treatments (TRAD = 6.0 ± 4.7; D0-GnRH = 3.8 ± 6.4; D0+GnRH = 7.5 ± 6.5). Regardless of the treatment method, ewes with follicles ≤ 4 mm, at the first FSH dose, produced more viable embryos (9.6 ± 6.0, P < 0.05) compared to ewes that had follicles > 4 mm at the beginning of the SOV (2.9 ± 3.1, viable embryos). Both the TRAD and D0+GnRH groups had fewer animals with large follicles (> 4 mm) at the first FSH dose than the D0-GnRH group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, both the TRAD and D0+GnRH treatments induced a more favorable ovarian condition (follicles ≤ 4 mm) for adequate SOV; although, all three treatments exhibited similar efficacies in Santa Inês sheep.