Pichaya In-na

Dr. Pichaya In-na

Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGary Caldwell
Gary Caldwell
Pichaya In-naPichaya In-na
Pichaya In-na
RHRachel Hart
Rachel Hart
ESElliot Sharp
Elliot Sharp
ASAssia Stefanova
Assia Stefanova
JLJonathan G. M. Lee
Jonathan G. M. Lee
There is a groundswell of interest in applying phototrophic microorganisms, specifically microalgae and cyanobacteria, for biotechnology and ecosystem service applications. However, there are inherent challenges associated with conventional routes to their deployment (using ponds, raceways and photobioreactors) which are synonymous with suspension cultivation techniques. Cultivation as biofilms partly ameliorates these issues; however, based on the principles of process intensification, by taking a step beyond biofilms and exploiting nature inspired artificial cell immobilisation, new opportunities become available, particularly for applications requiring extensive deployment periods (e.g., carbon capture and wastewater bioremediation). We explore the rationale for, and approaches to immobilised cultivation, in particular the application of latex-based polymer immobilisation as living biocomposites. We discuss how biocomposites can be optimised at the design stage based on mass transfer limitations. Finally, we predict that biocomposites will have a defining role in realising the deployment of metabolically engineered organisms for real world applications that may tip the balance of risk towards their environmental deployment.

7 July 2022 in Biomaterials Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPSwati Panda
Swati Panda
SHSugato Hajra
Sugato Hajra
Krystian MistewiczKrystian Mistewicz
Krystian Mistewicz
BNBartłomiej Nowacki
Bartłomiej Nowacki
Pichaya In-naPichaya In-na
Pichaya In-na
HKHoe Joon Kim
Hoe Joon Kim
This review focuses on the use of 3D bioprinting as an effective tool for artificial organ development and cancer research. Various 3D printing technologies and their advantages are also highlighted.

1 December 2020 in Journal of CO2 Utilization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pichaya In-naPichaya In-na
Pichaya In-na
AUAbbas A. Umar
Abbas A. Umar
AWAdam D. Wallace
Adam D. Wallace
MFMichael Flickinger
Michael Flickinger
GCGary Caldwell
Gary Caldwell
JLJonathan G.M. Lee
Jonathan G.M. Lee

19 November 2022 in Journal of Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CJChalampol Janpum
Chalampol Janpum
NPNuttapon Pombubpa
Nuttapon Pombubpa
TMTanakarn Monshupanee
Tanakarn Monshupanee
AIAran Incharoensakdi
Aran Incharoensakdi
Pichaya In-naPichaya In-na
Pichaya In-na

5 March 2024 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAugustine Odibo
Augustine Odibo
CJChalampol Janpum
Chalampol Janpum
NPNuttapon Pombubpa
Nuttapon Pombubpa
TMTanakarn Monshupanee
Tanakarn Monshupanee
AIAran Incharoensakdi
Aran Incharoensakdi
Pichaya In-naPichaya In-na
Pichaya In-na

2 July 2021 in Journal of Industrial Textiles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pichaya In-naPichaya In-na
Pichaya In-na
JLJonathan Lee
Jonathan Lee
GCGary Caldwell
Gary Caldwell
Over 110 million tonnes of textile fibres and apparel are produced annually, ultimately ending with significant quantities of waste textiles. One route for upcycling end-of-life textiles is to repurpose the materials for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) removal by integrating microalgae (single celled photosynthetic organisms) to form ‘living’ biocomposites. In this study we demonstrate the CO2 capture performance of prototype living algae biocomposites that use textiles as a solid substrate. Chlorella vulgaris was attached to 100% cotton and 100% polyester sheets, of which half were coated with kappa-carrageenan (a natural polymer derived from seaweed) as a gel topcoat to enhance microalgae retention. The biocomposites were investigated in 28 days semi-batch CO2 absorption tests using a 5% v/v CO2/air gas mixture. They absorbed significantly more CO2 than suspension microalgae culture controls, with the highest CO2 absorption rate being 1.82 ± 0.10 g CO2 g−1biomass d−1 from the coated cotton biocomposites, followed by 1.55 ± 0.27 g CO2 g−1biomass d−1 from the uncoated cotton biocomposites. The coated and uncoated polyester biocomposites had comparatively lower CO2 absorption rates (0.49 ± 0.04 and 0.42 ± 0.03 g CO2 g−1biomass d−1 respectively), likely due to the surface charges of the materials affecting microalgae adhesion and retention. A two weeks attachment test on cotton/polyester blends revealed some deterioration of the cotton which could limit the longevity of the biocomposites. Despite these issues, the CO2 abatement values compare favourably with other Chlorella CO2 capture studies with the added benefit of much reduced water usage and a reduced land requirement.